§1. Corrosion under insulation [01:03]
Student: [Question about lagging on these systems, particularly the stainless steel one.]
There's something called corrosion under insulation. If you take a corrosion course, they cover it under crevice corrosion. Anytime you put insulation around something, if that insulation gets wet and moisture gets in there, you have a perfect little environment to create a concentration corrosion cell. In carbon steel it's not so bad — some of those go for twenty-five years before something bad might start happening. But in stainless steel it can really be bad.
I had a situation with the company that makes Manwich — the supplements with the ground beef. They were making Manwich, and it turns out you have to keep the product above 200 degrees Fahrenheit or you have to scrap it, throw out all the food. So they had a jacket — basically a hundred-gallon hot water tank — and people design these things to operate at 200 degrees Fahrenheit, but it had to be operating between 200 and 210 because you had to keep the product above 200. Every day this was a food plant and they had to disinfect. So what do they use? Bleach. You spray it on. It kills bugs. It also corrodes stainless steel like gangbusters.
My mother lived with us for seventeen years until she passed away. One night she didn't have many things to wash, so she decided to put the stainless steel dinnerware in a little bit of water and some bleach to sanitize it rather than running the dishwasher. Well, overnight, an oxygenated chloride environment will pit stainless steel in twenty-four hours. So we had this big pit in the dinnerware. It's amazing how fast it happens.
So at the Manwich plant they had insulation, lagging, around this hot water tank, and they'd been washing it down with a dilute bleach foam on a regular basis. The controller wasn't really maintaining temperature properly, and eventually the tank failed — you've got hot water under some pressure and it expands, and it can hurt anybody in the area. So: corrosion under lagging.
§2. Navy ship life extension and seawater piping [04:30]
When you talk about the in-ring designs of stainless steel, stress corrosion cracking is a serious problem. Carbon steel, you don't get stress corrosion cracking, you get general corrosion. One of the problems the Navy has is, originally back in the 1950s they built the ships to last 30 years. By the 1980s they were starting to push them out to 40 years, and now they're going for 50 years on a ship.
They decided to extend the life of the ships, and as they've done that, there was a transition region in the 1990s where they hadn't really replaced all the piping with more corrosion-resistant piping. For carbon steel piping, you could let it go for 30 years and have enough original thickness from the general corrosion. Well, after 30 years you just scrap it. But people taking care of these ships in the 1990s and 2000s — ships built for 30 years of life — they were replacing carbon steel all over the place. That's why they've gone to copper-nickel seawater piping on the new ships. You're not going to get 50 years out of carbon steel; you've got to be down replacing the piping system, otherwise the ship is going to have problems.
§3. Hydrogen diffusion and the diffusion equation [07:13]
What I want to do now is talk about hydrogen embrittlement. I'm taking this out of Jud Olson's old book on welding metallurgy — it's on your syllabus. He's got a very good chapter on hydrogen embrittlement. What basically happens is, hydrogen goes to the crack tip — I discussed this in the joining picture — you have a triaxial stress region, and that's why it's delayed cracking: it takes hydrogen time to diffuse to the tip of the crack. It concentrates there and it embrittles the steel. People have taken videos — they polish a crack tip, look through the microscope, charge it with hydrogen in a corrosion process, and then stretch it in the microscope, and you can see the cracks come around.
It's a very rapid process on an atomic scale. The diffusivity — at room temperature the diffusivity of hydrogen is about 5 × 10⁻⁵ centimeters squared per second.
It turns out a guy named Albert Einstein looked at all the diffusion equations. You've got the diffusion equation for viscosity — that's the Navier-Stokes equation. You've got it for mass, which is Fick's laws of diffusion, mass diffusivity. You've got it for heat diffusion, which is Fourier's law. Those are all from the 19th century. Einstein comes along and says, well, these are all just diffusion processes. And if you look at the math — I actually took a full course in graduate school out of the math department dealing with one equation — Einstein showed you can have a dimensionless number describing mass diffusivity. It's x-squared over Dt. If you're talking about Fourier's law it's x-squared over alpha-t, where alpha is the thermal diffusivity.
Navier-Stokes is a little messier with viscosity and convection, but still, you can talk about the diffusion of shear stress. If you don't have any convection you'll end up with a similar formula. All three of these things — momentum, mass, and heat — can be described by a diffusion equation. The argument of the diffusion equation is always going to be of the form x-squared over Dt or alpha-t, and that is dimensionless, because D is centimeters squared per second.
So if I have D equal to 5 × 10⁻⁵ centimeters squared per second, and I want to know how long it takes for hydrogen to go one millimeter — a tenth of a centimeter — I square that, I get 0.01, divided by 5 × 10⁻⁵, and the time comes out to about a thousand seconds. About twenty minutes. For hydrogen to diffuse one millimeter.
There are old books written by mathematicians. Crank, Mathematics of Diffusion — it's just solutions to the diffusion equation in different geometries: plates, thick plates, thin plates, infinite plates, cylinders, spheres. There's another one, Carslaw and Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, and it's the same math. Crank was for mass diffusion. These are 50- or 60-year-old books, but mathematicians can solve this. That's where you start learning what a Bessel function is — the solution of the diffusion equation in cylindrical coordinates gives you Bessel functions; thin plates give you an infinite series. I could be teaching you all that stuff, go back to my youth, okay.
The point is, it takes time for hydrogen to diffuse a millimeter, and a millimeter's not very deep. Let's say I have a piece of steel that is two inches thick. To get to the surface, the stuff in the middle has to diffuse one inch, which is 25 millimeters. Squared, that's 625. So now it's 625 times longer than the millimeter case — and at four inches thick, the distance squares again, and it's going to take a whole day for hydrogen to get out of a four-inch-thick plate.
§4. Preheating, thickness, and the Fore River Bridge [13:56]
When they were doing some of the foundation welds on GE turbines, they could put in half an inch of weld metal, then they had to stop and keep the preheat on for three or four hours just to allow the hydrogen out before you put more on top. If you're doing armor steel back in World War II — that's 17 inches thick — they had to go slow. They went slow anyway because of stick electrodes, but if you didn't allow time for the hydrogen to diffuse out, you had a problem.
There was the Fore River Bridge in Quincy — the state of Massachusetts is building a new drawbridge. They had eight inches thick of a high-strength alloyed steel, very difficult to weld. I told them, you've got to stop every half-inch for two hours to diffuse the hydrogen out. People had never heard of that — when you go to very thick steel you've got to stop to give time to the hydrogen to diffuse out, otherwise it's trapped forever. You start going through the diffusion equation, you're not going to get it out of there in any reasonable time. You'll get cracks before it all happens. So you have to worry about steel thickness as well.
Part of the problem, people would call me and say, well, we want to weld such-and-such, how do we do it? And I'd ask, what's the composition, what's the thickness — those are the two things I needed to know.
§5. The hydrogen-microstructure-stress Venn diagram [15:51]
Another thing we talked about is microstructure, tensile stress, and hydrogen. Here's a nice Venn diagram to tell you the situation. Each one of these circles — there's going to be an intersection where everything's on track for cracking.
This plot tells you how much hydrogen you can expect from different welding processes. Go to some of the books on welding steel without hydrogen cracking and you'll find this. Hydrogen level is in milliliters per 100 grams of weld deposit — within ten percent, that's the same number as parts per million hydrogen in the deposit. Here's shielded metal arc, the stick electrodes, way up here. Even with two-tenths of a percent moisture — which is the lowest level you can get — you're going to be up over 100 parts per million. Basic welds, baked electrodes at 350 to 450 °C — titanium dioxide electrodes or lime electrodes, different types of coatings — you can still be much higher, 10 or 20 parts per million hydrogen, and you're going to get cracking. This will crack HY-80 steel; some of this will crack HY-100. If you really want to weld HY-100, you should be down in this lowest range.
We have flux-core welding — that's what built bridges. Electric Boat brought me in 25 years ago — they'd built a new administration building where the cafeteria is right down the road. They took me to lunch, a couple of welding engineers, and the building was welded with flux-core. Flux-core is a hike up from gas metal arc — gas metal arc is a solid wire process, and flux-core, the wire is hollow with flux inside. Much more productive process, also can be fairly high in hydrogen. The lowest hydrogen is gas metal arc — this is what they're using on the hulls of ships now. That wasn't true 30 years ago, but today gas metal arc, you can get fairly little hydrogen because it only comes from grease and moisture or oil on the wire. So we keep pushing for better controls on gas metal arc cored wire.
Student: [Question about where the water's coming from.]
You have a little nozzle — a copper tip that has a hole in it — and you have a wire feeder, a little spool of wire, with rollers pushing it through this little nozzle, and the arc is struck to that wire. It's a continuous wire process. With gas tungsten arc, that's the tungsten one — they use a hundred-pound drum of wire. Gas tungsten arc is even lower in hydrogen than gas metal arc, because you weld much slower. The deposition rates overlap a little with gas-metal-arc-welding in some cases.
§6. Carbon equivalent [20:06]
We haven't gotten into it yet, but there are lots of formulas for what we call carbon equivalent. It's a measure of the hardenability. You take all these alloying elements — carbon gives you hardness and alloying elements give you hardenability. For welding, people talk about carbon equivalent, and over the last 80 years there are lots of different formulas. There's not just one right one to use. This one was developed for high-strength low-alloy steels — it's got niobium in it, because that's how they get the strength in the low alloy. Everybody wants to come up with their own carbon equivalent formula. We're going to go through the American Welding Society code and show you the version they use.
What the fractions represent is, for example, silicon at one-thirtieth: silicon is one-thirtieth as effective at hardening steel as carbon. Silicon hardens steel similar to carbon, but at one-thirtieth percent as effective. So you can get great depth of hardening, which is hardenability. But you also get hardness when you have these other alloying elements — they don't just get depth, they also get increased hardness. So these are all empirical formulas; everybody wants to own their own.
§7. Notch tensile strength and hydrogen at room temperature [21:46]
This is what I really wanted to get to. This is hydrogen-free samples — notch tensile strength, so it's like ripping a piece of paper, as a function of temperature. Right here at room temperature is where you get the greatest embrittlement from hydrogen.
I mentioned before that if you wanted to measure the hydrogen in steel in the laboratory, you'd quench it, put it in liquid nitrogen, because in liquid nitrogen the diffusivity slows way down, and you can run a sample for three or four days before you do your chemical analysis and still measure the hydrogen. You've got three or four orders of magnitude slower diffusion. At higher temperatures the stuff diffuses out more quickly. At 250 degrees with a preheat, it might be 10⁻⁴. So the hydrogen's diffusing out more rapidly. Nature has it that room temperature is absolutely the worst case. That's just the way it is and we have to live with it.
Student: Why in this graph at higher temperature does it look like it's increasing the strength?
Well, this is a brittleness test, and these are hydrogen-free samples — otherwise increasing the temperature should weaken it. I don't know if there's really good data for that. He may have actually had a little bit of hydrogen in the hydrogen-free samples. There's scatter around this curve, and I bet the scatter is as great as the slope. But there is definitely a difference here — you can lose 75 percent of your strength to hydrogen at room temperature. So all of a sudden your design, which was good for a fifty-percent-of-strength safety factor, is two times overloaded in terms of embrittlement. So we do have to worry about it.
§8. Boston Navy Yard chrome-moly to stainless transition joint [24:09]
So let me give you an example of this Venn diagram — this is one of my earliest cases. Microstructure, stress, hydrogen. I was 28 or 29 years old, a young faculty member trying to feed my family on the salary of an assistant professor.
I got a phone call from what used to be the Boss Navy [Boston Navy Yard] — they had the Constitution there, but this wasn't the Constitution, it was at Charlestown somewhere. They had a destroyer that was supposed to go out in one week, and for six weeks they'd been trying to weld chrome-moly tubing in the steam system to stainless steel. The Navy spec said you must use an Incanel [Inconel] base filler. They had been trying that — they'd had people come up from Philadelphia Navy Yard, some Navy welders had tried — and they kept getting cracks.
This is just a little one-inch tube of stainless steel and they had to join it like this. [Tom draws the joint geometry on the board.] They had to make it in the vertical position, because that's the way the tubes were oriented in the destroyer. They had to put in a root pass, and whenever they tried, they got a crack. This was stainless steel to chrome-moly steel — chrome-moly is a high-chromium steel for pressure systems; the stainless steel is even higher in chromium — and this is just a transition joint. Every time they tried, it cracked. They tried preheating, they tried all kinds of things, and they couldn't get it to work. So they called MIT, and I was the only one available, and I needed the money. They said, we want you to come down and tell the Navy why we should be able to do this without using Inconel. I had no idea if I could.
So I stay a little late. I try to get home at five o'clock for the little kids until they go to bed, and then I stay late and go to the library. I find an article in the Welding Journal from ten years earlier: if you weld this transition with stainless steel filler, it's going to crack on you, because the carbon will diffuse and form carbides with some of the things in the stainless steel. It's a long-term problem — at temperature, over time the carbon diffuses and you'll get cracking. So I knew I couldn't come and tell the Navy, hey, just disregard the spec, use stainless steel filler.
So I come down and I have a copy of the paper with me, and I meet with someone in a conference room. I said, well, you can't just disregard what the spec says. But let's talk about why you're having a problem. So they showed me, and I asked questions about all these things — hydrogen, the composition, moisture in the shielding gas. They couldn't do much about the microstructure — this was chrome-moly steel and stainless steel with the filler metal in between, and that's what the Navy spec required.
The only thing I could think of in this half-hour-to-forty-five-minute discussion, as I was quizzing them and they were quizzing me — they weren't real happy because I wasn't just saying, oh, no problem — I said, well, I'll tell you what. Why don't you try, instead of the joint groove that looks like that, why don't you machine one that looks like this, so that when you weld it you can put your root pass in here rather than in there, and you won't get such a big restraint stress. That will reduce your stress because you have some flexibility. Let me know how it works out. They said, no, we'll do it while you're here.
So we go out and they take a couple pieces of pipe, put them on the lathe, machine them, do the TIG weld — TIG is what you typically use for a root pass, slow but high quality. Then they wrap it in insulation to let it slow-cool, to let the hydrogen come out, per spec. We're standing around for 45 minutes while it's cooling, and the whole time the foreman who did the machining and welding is saying, this is not going to work, this is not going to work. This guy's got 40 years of experience, I've got four years of experience, who do you think's going to be right? I was just looking at my watch thinking, I have somewhere to be.
Then he takes the insulation off, and he goes to do the dye penetrant test. He cleans it with solvent, sprays the penetrant on, waits five minutes, sprays the developer — the white stuff — turning it around. [Tom mimes walking off.] I walked out of there. I don't know if they ever got the final inspection report, I had to get back. But I'd had no idea whether it would work. I'd quizzed them about getting rid of the hydrogen, the moisture in the shielding gas, and they'd checked all those things. The microstructure was going to be whatever it was — that was set by the spec. The only thing I could think of was how to lower the stress. It was sort of a shot in the dark, and it worked.
That's stress, in the Venn diagram. Once you got the root pass in, I think the spec allows you to use something else for the fill afterwards — they knew that — but in their final test it was just the root pass they couldn't get crack-free. By just changing the joint geometry — this gets to the point that if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. The people that came up from Philadelphia, they thought of it as a welding metallurgy problem. Well, the diagnosis was welding metallurgy, but the solution was a welding residual stress problem. So that's one of my early successes. Sometimes you have no idea how it'll work out.