WM_Su2015_08

Welding Metallurgy Summer 2015 Session · 8 sections 8 cases · Watch on YouTube ↗ all files
Layer 3 — readable edition

§1. Corrosion under insulation [01:03]

§1.p1

Student: [Question about lagging on these systems, particularly the stainless steel one.]

§1.p2

There's something called corrosion under insulation. If you take a corrosion course, they cover it under crevice corrosion. Anytime you put insulation around something, if that insulation gets wet and moisture gets in there, you have a perfect little environment to create a concentration corrosion cell. In carbon steel it's not so bad — some of those go for twenty-five years before something bad might start happening. But in stainless steel it can really be bad.

§1.p3

I had a situation with the company that makes Manwich — the supplements with the ground beef. They were making Manwich, and it turns out you have to keep the product above 200 degrees Fahrenheit or you have to scrap it, throw out all the food. So they had a jacket — basically a hundred-gallon hot water tank — and people design these things to operate at 200 degrees Fahrenheit, but it had to be operating between 200 and 210 because you had to keep the product above 200. Every day this was a food plant and they had to disinfect. So what do they use? Bleach. You spray it on. It kills bugs. It also corrodes stainless steel like gangbusters.

§1.p4

My mother lived with us for seventeen years until she passed away. One night she didn't have many things to wash, so she decided to put the stainless steel dinnerware in a little bit of water and some bleach to sanitize it rather than running the dishwasher. Well, overnight, an oxygenated chloride environment will pit stainless steel in twenty-four hours. So we had this big pit in the dinnerware. It's amazing how fast it happens.

§1.p5

So at the Manwich plant they had insulation, lagging, around this hot water tank, and they'd been washing it down with a dilute bleach foam on a regular basis. The controller wasn't really maintaining temperature properly, and eventually the tank failed — you've got hot water under some pressure and it expands, and it can hurt anybody in the area. So: corrosion under lagging.

§2. Navy ship life extension and seawater piping [04:30]

§2.p1

When you talk about the in-ring designs of stainless steel, stress corrosion cracking is a serious problem. Carbon steel, you don't get stress corrosion cracking, you get general corrosion. One of the problems the Navy has is, originally back in the 1950s they built the ships to last 30 years. By the 1980s they were starting to push them out to 40 years, and now they're going for 50 years on a ship.

§2.p2

They decided to extend the life of the ships, and as they've done that, there was a transition region in the 1990s where they hadn't really replaced all the piping with more corrosion-resistant piping. For carbon steel piping, you could let it go for 30 years and have enough original thickness from the general corrosion. Well, after 30 years you just scrap it. But people taking care of these ships in the 1990s and 2000s — ships built for 30 years of life — they were replacing carbon steel all over the place. That's why they've gone to copper-nickel seawater piping on the new ships. You're not going to get 50 years out of carbon steel; you've got to be down replacing the piping system, otherwise the ship is going to have problems.

§3. Hydrogen diffusion and the diffusion equation [07:13]

§3.p1

What I want to do now is talk about hydrogen embrittlement. I'm taking this out of Jud Olson's old book on welding metallurgy — it's on your syllabus. He's got a very good chapter on hydrogen embrittlement. What basically happens is, hydrogen goes to the crack tip — I discussed this in the joining picture — you have a triaxial stress region, and that's why it's delayed cracking: it takes hydrogen time to diffuse to the tip of the crack. It concentrates there and it embrittles the steel. People have taken videos — they polish a crack tip, look through the microscope, charge it with hydrogen in a corrosion process, and then stretch it in the microscope, and you can see the cracks come around.

§3.p2

It's a very rapid process on an atomic scale. The diffusivity — at room temperature the diffusivity of hydrogen is about 5 × 10⁻⁵ centimeters squared per second.

§3.p3

It turns out a guy named Albert Einstein looked at all the diffusion equations. You've got the diffusion equation for viscosity — that's the Navier-Stokes equation. You've got it for mass, which is Fick's laws of diffusion, mass diffusivity. You've got it for heat diffusion, which is Fourier's law. Those are all from the 19th century. Einstein comes along and says, well, these are all just diffusion processes. And if you look at the math — I actually took a full course in graduate school out of the math department dealing with one equation — Einstein showed you can have a dimensionless number describing mass diffusivity. It's x-squared over Dt. If you're talking about Fourier's law it's x-squared over alpha-t, where alpha is the thermal diffusivity.

§3.p4

Navier-Stokes is a little messier with viscosity and convection, but still, you can talk about the diffusion of shear stress. If you don't have any convection you'll end up with a similar formula. All three of these things — momentum, mass, and heat — can be described by a diffusion equation. The argument of the diffusion equation is always going to be of the form x-squared over Dt or alpha-t, and that is dimensionless, because D is centimeters squared per second.

§3.p5

So if I have D equal to 5 × 10⁻⁵ centimeters squared per second, and I want to know how long it takes for hydrogen to go one millimeter — a tenth of a centimeter — I square that, I get 0.01, divided by 5 × 10⁻⁵, and the time comes out to about a thousand seconds. About twenty minutes. For hydrogen to diffuse one millimeter.

§3.p6

There are old books written by mathematicians. Crank, Mathematics of Diffusion — it's just solutions to the diffusion equation in different geometries: plates, thick plates, thin plates, infinite plates, cylinders, spheres. There's another one, Carslaw and Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, and it's the same math. Crank was for mass diffusion. These are 50- or 60-year-old books, but mathematicians can solve this. That's where you start learning what a Bessel function is — the solution of the diffusion equation in cylindrical coordinates gives you Bessel functions; thin plates give you an infinite series. I could be teaching you all that stuff, go back to my youth, okay.

§3.p7

The point is, it takes time for hydrogen to diffuse a millimeter, and a millimeter's not very deep. Let's say I have a piece of steel that is two inches thick. To get to the surface, the stuff in the middle has to diffuse one inch, which is 25 millimeters. Squared, that's 625. So now it's 625 times longer than the millimeter case — and at four inches thick, the distance squares again, and it's going to take a whole day for hydrogen to get out of a four-inch-thick plate.

§4. Preheating, thickness, and the Fore River Bridge [13:56]

§4.p1

When they were doing some of the foundation welds on GE turbines, they could put in half an inch of weld metal, then they had to stop and keep the preheat on for three or four hours just to allow the hydrogen out before you put more on top. If you're doing armor steel back in World War II — that's 17 inches thick — they had to go slow. They went slow anyway because of stick electrodes, but if you didn't allow time for the hydrogen to diffuse out, you had a problem.

§4.p2

There was the Fore River Bridge in Quincy — the state of Massachusetts is building a new drawbridge. They had eight inches thick of a high-strength alloyed steel, very difficult to weld. I told them, you've got to stop every half-inch for two hours to diffuse the hydrogen out. People had never heard of that — when you go to very thick steel you've got to stop to give time to the hydrogen to diffuse out, otherwise it's trapped forever. You start going through the diffusion equation, you're not going to get it out of there in any reasonable time. You'll get cracks before it all happens. So you have to worry about steel thickness as well.

§4.p3

Part of the problem, people would call me and say, well, we want to weld such-and-such, how do we do it? And I'd ask, what's the composition, what's the thickness — those are the two things I needed to know.

§5. The hydrogen-microstructure-stress Venn diagram [15:51]

§5.p1

Another thing we talked about is microstructure, tensile stress, and hydrogen. Here's a nice Venn diagram to tell you the situation. Each one of these circles — there's going to be an intersection where everything's on track for cracking.

§5.p2

This plot tells you how much hydrogen you can expect from different welding processes. Go to some of the books on welding steel without hydrogen cracking and you'll find this. Hydrogen level is in milliliters per 100 grams of weld deposit — within ten percent, that's the same number as parts per million hydrogen in the deposit. Here's shielded metal arc, the stick electrodes, way up here. Even with two-tenths of a percent moisture — which is the lowest level you can get — you're going to be up over 100 parts per million. Basic welds, baked electrodes at 350 to 450 °C — titanium dioxide electrodes or lime electrodes, different types of coatings — you can still be much higher, 10 or 20 parts per million hydrogen, and you're going to get cracking. This will crack HY-80 steel; some of this will crack HY-100. If you really want to weld HY-100, you should be down in this lowest range.

§5.p3

We have flux-core welding — that's what built bridges. Electric Boat brought me in 25 years ago — they'd built a new administration building where the cafeteria is right down the road. They took me to lunch, a couple of welding engineers, and the building was welded with flux-core. Flux-core is a hike up from gas metal arc — gas metal arc is a solid wire process, and flux-core, the wire is hollow with flux inside. Much more productive process, also can be fairly high in hydrogen. The lowest hydrogen is gas metal arc — this is what they're using on the hulls of ships now. That wasn't true 30 years ago, but today gas metal arc, you can get fairly little hydrogen because it only comes from grease and moisture or oil on the wire. So we keep pushing for better controls on gas metal arc cored wire.

§5.p4

Student: [Question about where the water's coming from.]

§5.p5

You have a little nozzle — a copper tip that has a hole in it — and you have a wire feeder, a little spool of wire, with rollers pushing it through this little nozzle, and the arc is struck to that wire. It's a continuous wire process. With gas tungsten arc, that's the tungsten one — they use a hundred-pound drum of wire. Gas tungsten arc is even lower in hydrogen than gas metal arc, because you weld much slower. The deposition rates overlap a little with gas-metal-arc-welding in some cases.

§6. Carbon equivalent [20:06]

§6.p1

We haven't gotten into it yet, but there are lots of formulas for what we call carbon equivalent. It's a measure of the hardenability. You take all these alloying elements — carbon gives you hardness and alloying elements give you hardenability. For welding, people talk about carbon equivalent, and over the last 80 years there are lots of different formulas. There's not just one right one to use. This one was developed for high-strength low-alloy steels — it's got niobium in it, because that's how they get the strength in the low alloy. Everybody wants to come up with their own carbon equivalent formula. We're going to go through the American Welding Society code and show you the version they use.

§6.p2

What the fractions represent is, for example, silicon at one-thirtieth: silicon is one-thirtieth as effective at hardening steel as carbon. Silicon hardens steel similar to carbon, but at one-thirtieth percent as effective. So you can get great depth of hardening, which is hardenability. But you also get hardness when you have these other alloying elements — they don't just get depth, they also get increased hardness. So these are all empirical formulas; everybody wants to own their own.

§7. Notch tensile strength and hydrogen at room temperature [21:46]

§7.p1

This is what I really wanted to get to. This is hydrogen-free samples — notch tensile strength, so it's like ripping a piece of paper, as a function of temperature. Right here at room temperature is where you get the greatest embrittlement from hydrogen.

§7.p2

I mentioned before that if you wanted to measure the hydrogen in steel in the laboratory, you'd quench it, put it in liquid nitrogen, because in liquid nitrogen the diffusivity slows way down, and you can run a sample for three or four days before you do your chemical analysis and still measure the hydrogen. You've got three or four orders of magnitude slower diffusion. At higher temperatures the stuff diffuses out more quickly. At 250 degrees with a preheat, it might be 10⁻⁴. So the hydrogen's diffusing out more rapidly. Nature has it that room temperature is absolutely the worst case. That's just the way it is and we have to live with it.

§7.p3

Student: Why in this graph at higher temperature does it look like it's increasing the strength?

§7.p4

Well, this is a brittleness test, and these are hydrogen-free samples — otherwise increasing the temperature should weaken it. I don't know if there's really good data for that. He may have actually had a little bit of hydrogen in the hydrogen-free samples. There's scatter around this curve, and I bet the scatter is as great as the slope. But there is definitely a difference here — you can lose 75 percent of your strength to hydrogen at room temperature. So all of a sudden your design, which was good for a fifty-percent-of-strength safety factor, is two times overloaded in terms of embrittlement. So we do have to worry about it.

§8. Boston Navy Yard chrome-moly to stainless transition joint [24:09]

§8.p1

So let me give you an example of this Venn diagram — this is one of my earliest cases. Microstructure, stress, hydrogen. I was 28 or 29 years old, a young faculty member trying to feed my family on the salary of an assistant professor.

§8.p2

I got a phone call from what used to be the Boss Navy [Boston Navy Yard] — they had the Constitution there, but this wasn't the Constitution, it was at Charlestown somewhere. They had a destroyer that was supposed to go out in one week, and for six weeks they'd been trying to weld chrome-moly tubing in the steam system to stainless steel. The Navy spec said you must use an Incanel [Inconel] base filler. They had been trying that — they'd had people come up from Philadelphia Navy Yard, some Navy welders had tried — and they kept getting cracks.

§8.p3

This is just a little one-inch tube of stainless steel and they had to join it like this. [Tom draws the joint geometry on the board.] They had to make it in the vertical position, because that's the way the tubes were oriented in the destroyer. They had to put in a root pass, and whenever they tried, they got a crack. This was stainless steel to chrome-moly steel — chrome-moly is a high-chromium steel for pressure systems; the stainless steel is even higher in chromium — and this is just a transition joint. Every time they tried, it cracked. They tried preheating, they tried all kinds of things, and they couldn't get it to work. So they called MIT, and I was the only one available, and I needed the money. They said, we want you to come down and tell the Navy why we should be able to do this without using Inconel. I had no idea if I could.

§8.p4

So I stay a little late. I try to get home at five o'clock for the little kids until they go to bed, and then I stay late and go to the library. I find an article in the Welding Journal from ten years earlier: if you weld this transition with stainless steel filler, it's going to crack on you, because the carbon will diffuse and form carbides with some of the things in the stainless steel. It's a long-term problem — at temperature, over time the carbon diffuses and you'll get cracking. So I knew I couldn't come and tell the Navy, hey, just disregard the spec, use stainless steel filler.

§8.p5

So I come down and I have a copy of the paper with me, and I meet with someone in a conference room. I said, well, you can't just disregard what the spec says. But let's talk about why you're having a problem. So they showed me, and I asked questions about all these things — hydrogen, the composition, moisture in the shielding gas. They couldn't do much about the microstructure — this was chrome-moly steel and stainless steel with the filler metal in between, and that's what the Navy spec required.

§8.p6

The only thing I could think of in this half-hour-to-forty-five-minute discussion, as I was quizzing them and they were quizzing me — they weren't real happy because I wasn't just saying, oh, no problem — I said, well, I'll tell you what. Why don't you try, instead of the joint groove that looks like that, why don't you machine one that looks like this, so that when you weld it you can put your root pass in here rather than in there, and you won't get such a big restraint stress. That will reduce your stress because you have some flexibility. Let me know how it works out. They said, no, we'll do it while you're here.

§8.p7

So we go out and they take a couple pieces of pipe, put them on the lathe, machine them, do the TIG weld — TIG is what you typically use for a root pass, slow but high quality. Then they wrap it in insulation to let it slow-cool, to let the hydrogen come out, per spec. We're standing around for 45 minutes while it's cooling, and the whole time the foreman who did the machining and welding is saying, this is not going to work, this is not going to work. This guy's got 40 years of experience, I've got four years of experience, who do you think's going to be right? I was just looking at my watch thinking, I have somewhere to be.

§8.p8

Then he takes the insulation off, and he goes to do the dye penetrant test. He cleans it with solvent, sprays the penetrant on, waits five minutes, sprays the developer — the white stuff — turning it around. [Tom mimes walking off.] I walked out of there. I don't know if they ever got the final inspection report, I had to get back. But I'd had no idea whether it would work. I'd quizzed them about getting rid of the hydrogen, the moisture in the shielding gas, and they'd checked all those things. The microstructure was going to be whatever it was — that was set by the spec. The only thing I could think of was how to lower the stress. It was sort of a shot in the dark, and it worked.

§8.p9

That's stress, in the Venn diagram. Once you got the root pass in, I think the spec allows you to use something else for the fill afterwards — they knew that — but in their final test it was just the root pass they couldn't get crack-free. By just changing the joint geometry — this gets to the point that if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. The people that came up from Philadelphia, they thought of it as a welding metallurgy problem. Well, the diagnosis was welding metallurgy, but the solution was a welding residual stress problem. So that's one of my early successes. Sometimes you have no idea how it'll work out.

Cases referenced

  • Manwich hot water tank stress corrosion cracking §1.p3

    Food plant disinfection regimen (bleach spray over stainless steel insulated tank) produced corrosion under lagging at the 200–210 °F operating window. Used to illustrate the corrosion-under-insulation mechanism.

  • Stainless steel dinnerware bleach pitting (personal anecdote) §1.p4

    Tom's mother soaked dinnerware in dilute bleach overnight; oxygenated chloride pitted the stainless in 24 hours. Used as a domestic-scale demonstration of the Manwich mechanism.

  • US Navy nuclear submarine steel pipe corrosion (30-year ship life) §2.p1

    Ships originally designed for 30-year service life have been extended to 40, then 50 years. The 1990s–2000s transition period saw extensive carbon-steel piping replacement before the move to copper-nickel seawater piping on new ships.

  • Fore River Bridge (Quincy) §4.p2

    Massachusetts drawbridge replacement, 8-inch-thick high-strength alloyed steel. Tom advised stopping every half-inch of weld for two hours to allow hydrogen diffusion. Used to illustrate that thickness-squared scaling makes hydrogen removal an engineering constraint, not just a metallurgical one.

  • WWII armor plate stress-relief welding §4.p1

    Brief reference — 17-inch-thick WWII armor steel required slow welding partly because stick electrodes were slow anyway, but also because hydrogen had to be allowed to diffuse out. Used as the historical precedent for the Fore River advice.

  • GE turbine heavy-section preheats §4.p1

    Half-inch weld layers required 3–4 hour preheat holds to allow hydrogen to diffuse out before the next pass. Used as a contemporary parallel to the WWII armor case.

  • Electric Boat administration building (flux-core welding) §5.p3

    Brief aside — 25 years ago Tom was brought in by Electric Boat, taken to lunch in their new cafeteria building, which was welded with flux-core. Used to illustrate that flux-core is structurally adequate despite being higher in hydrogen than gas metal arc.

  • Boston Navy Yard chrome-moly to stainless transition joint §8.p1

    Tom's earliest major consulting success. Destroyer steam-system weld between chrome-moly tube and stainless steel; six weeks of failed attempts using the Inconel filler the Navy spec required. Tom's intervention was a joint-geometry change (machine a different groove profile to put the root pass in a lower-restraint position), which reduced residual stress and let the weld pass dye penetrant inspection. Used as the structural worked example of the microstructure/stress/hydrogen Venn diagram — diagnosis was welding metallurgy, solution was residual stress.

Layer 2 — cleanup edit
p1 00:02

...or nearly, you think, we've been piping to insulate it, use the earth to your advantage, not on the military base, okay, because expected — not today, nowadays they hit you with a warhead, don't wipe out the whole basement. Let's give the old age, they didn't have really high explosives like that. So the other thing, I sort of, well, why do they do these things, and it wasn't, I came to apologize and know whatever you told me, I just, one day I was thinking, oh, okay. And I've had a number of failures over the years where people forgot what an internal expansion joint is, okay. So what questions about Nate's [presentation]? Yeah, so that's what you're getting, your regular questions. One of these were good presentations for you to hear about what other people have gone through.

p2 01:03

Student: [inaudible question about lagging on both of these, particularly the stainless steel one]

p3 01:06

There's something called corrosion under insulation, which if you take a corrosion course they fought under the positive tags, or crevice corrosion or something. But what you got, lagging, but anytime you put insulation around something, if that insulation gets wet and moisture gets in there, you have a perfect little environment, if the moisture gets deep in there, to create a nice concentration of corrosion cell. And in carbon steel it's not so bad — some of those for twenty-five years and before something bad might start happening. But in stainless steel it can really be bad.

p4 01:49

I had a situation, the company that makes Manwich, you know, the supplements with the ground beef, okay. They were making Manwich, and it turns out you have to — if you shut the system down you have to keep your product above 200 degrees Fahrenheit or you have to scrap it, just throw out all the food. And now people need it, but they don't like to do that. So they have a jacket that had this hot water tank basically, and they, people design these things such, it was a hundred gallon hot water tank, and it was not to operate above 204 degrees, effectively supposed to operate at 200 degrees Fahrenheit, but it had to be operating between 200 and 210 because you had to keep the product above 200 or you're going to have to scrap it, okay. Are you doing maintenance? Well every day this was a plant food and they had to disinfect. So what do they use? Bleach. So do you spray it on? Right. It kills bugs. It also corrodes stainless steel like gangbusters, okay.

p5 03:00

My mother, when she lived with us for seventeen years until she passed away, but she, one night decided she wanted, she used to always want to do the dishes, okay, so I let her do it. You're taking, oh man, see her turn the hot water on, let her go on to the next hour and a half. But nonetheless, she for the remaining I guess, but anyway, one night she didn't have many things, so she decided to put the stainless steel dinnerware in a little bit of water and some bleach to sanitize it rather than running the dishwasher. Well overnight, an oxygenated chloride environment will pit stainless steel in twenty-four hours. So we had this big pit in that part of the same, so that's why that time that device a new things dinnerware. But it's amazing how well.

p6 03:55

So they had insulation, lagging, around this hot water tank, and they'd been washing it down with a dilute bleach foam on a regular basis until one day — and part of the problem was the controller, it was really quite clear if it was really maintaining things, balances would go to 12, but it has gotten a little bit of love, but in case it would open, it kills, and you got off much hot water under some pressure and it expands, of any body area. Same thing that happens to people, behooves you, okay. So, corrosion under lagging.

p7 04:30

So when you talk about in the in-ring designs of the stainless steel, I mentioned something about the pre-real shearing system of CARE-34 [CRA-3/4?], for three or four smokers, who will get bloody. Stainless steel is a serious problem because it's stress corrosion cracking. Carbon steel, you don't get stress corrosion cracking, you get general corrosion. And one of the problems the Navy has is originally back in the 1950s they built the ships to last 30 years. By the 1980s they were starting to push them out to 40 years, and now what have you actually even said, it's 45, you said, going for another 25, I think. Is that right? People are looking at 50 years for a ship. Do they actually have, is the port that evolved to the places of minutes? Then someone finally after 15 years to the bulletin spend 50 minutes also, they don't ship other was another program, one floating now from that, that get in the water but cosmic. So they have those, you go to 64, okay. So they finally did, from they just couldn't afford our skating later.

p8 05:47

In any case, the show is the Florida heavier displacement Rabinowitz, whenever it was, was getting up over 95,000, I think over 100, 110. Yeah, no, it's definitely, okay. In any case, we're going — oh, so anyway, they decided, they decided to extend the life of the ships, and as they've done that, there was sort of a transition region there in the 1990s where they hadn't really replaced all the piping with more corrosion-resistant piping. For carbon steel piping, you could let it go for 30 years and you can have enough original thickness from the general corrosion you'd get. Well after 30 years you just scrap it. But people who are taking care of these ships in the 90s and 2000s, these ships that have been built for 30 years of life, they were just replacing carbon steel all over the place. And that's why they've gone to that pain seawater piping on the new ships. So they still, carbon steel, it's probably not, but you're not going to get 50 years of harvesting, you've got to be down and replace the level piping system, which other ship. Hey, so there's some thoughts there.

p9 07:13

Okay, let's, you want to start the deal, take me, okay. So what I'm doing right now is I want to just talk enough about hydrogen [embrittlement]. There were a couple points that, basically I'm taking things out of, and this is on your syllabus, but this is out of Jud Olds's [Jud Olson's?] old book of welding metallurgy. And actually he's got a very good chapter on hydrogen embrittlement, okay. And there's, what basically happens is, the hydrogen goes to the crack tip — I think I've discussed this in the joining picture — but you have a triaxial stress region, and that's why it's delayed cracking, it takes hydrogen time to diffuse to the tip of the crack. It concentrates at the tip of the crack and it embrittles it. And I told you, people have taken videos — it polishes a crack tip, look out of the microscope, charge it with hydrogen in a corrosion process, and then they just stretch it in the microscope and you can see the height of the bubbles come around.

p10 08:14

This is photo session last week, we have the video really putting Lucille hide my gal, we talked about, you know, it's a very rapid process. There was a really tail-base cracking, so this is a slower, so where the hydrogen coming from, the slow process is crack introducing — like, no, this is all occurring within a couple of days. Oh, this was so loud this event. It's so rapid on an atomic scale, the diffusivity, go through the numbers sometimes if I watch eats it right here. But I put up some things that show, at room temperature the diffusivity of hydrogen, it's about 20 × 10⁻⁵ centimeter squared per second.

p11 09:09

It turns out a guy named Albert Einstein looked at all the diffusion equations. You got the diffusion equation for viscosity, okay, and that's called the Navier-Stokes equation, okay. You've got it for mass, which is Fick's laws of diffusion, mass diffusivity. You've got it for heat diffusion, which is Fourier's law. Those are all the 19th century. So Einstein comes along and he says, well, these are all just diffusion processes. And if you look at the math — and I actually took in graduate school a full course out of the math department all dealing with one equation — and Einstein showed, sometimes called the Einstein number, that you can have a dimensionless number talking about mass diffusivity. It's d-squared over — or no, it's x-squared over Dt, diffusivity. If you're talking about Fourier's law it's x-squared over alpha t, where alpha is the thermal diffusivity, okay.

p12 10:18

Now Navier-Stokes, this little messier with viscosity convection and things like that, but still, you can talk about the diffusion of shear stress, okay. And if you don't have any convection you'll end up with a similar formula, that all three of these things — momentum, which is Navier-Stokes, mass, or heat — can all be described by a diffusion equation. But the argument of the diffusion equation is always going to be of the form x-squared over Dt or alpha t or whatever, and that is dimensionless because D is centimeter squared per second times — centimeter squared divided by, divided into centimeter squared, dimensionless, okay.

p13 11:03

So if I have D minus, 5 × 10⁻⁵ centimeter squared per second, and I want to know how long it takes for hydrogen to go one millimeter, which is the tenth of a centimeter, and I square that, I get point oh one, as the distance, over Dt, so by 5 times time, and time times — wait, so time is equal to 10 to the third, right. A thousand seconds. Three hours — no, twenty minutes. For hydrogen to diffuse one millimeter, this was equal to one. Yeah, if it was conventional, as long as you say yeah set it equal to one. Actually, in a lot of the forms of the equation that went, MIA for here might be a buy here, there's different depending on the job you're, what you're looking at.

p14 12:03

There are old books written by mathematicians. One's Crank, Mathematics of Diffusion — it's just solutions to the diffusion equation in different geometries, plates, thick plates, thin plates, infinite plates, cylinders, spheres, okay. There's another one, Carslaw and Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, and it's just the same math. Crank was for mass diffusion. And these are about 50- or 60-year-old books, but mathematicians can solve this. And that's where you get into starting learning what a Bessel function is, okay. The solution of the diffusion equation in cylindrical coordinates are sort of, are for this, you've got Bessel functions, thin plates give you an infinite series, sum types of, thank you, guys ordered without now. So you, I could be teaching you all that stuff, go back to my youth, okay.

p15 13:02

But in any case, if I, × 4, so it's an hour and a half rather than 20 minutes, who cares, okay. The point is it takes time for hydrogen to diffuse a millimeter, okay. Well, millimeters not very deep. Let's say I have a piece of steel that is two inches thick. That means to get to the surface the stuff in the middle has to diffuse one inch, which is 25 millimeters, squared, 25, this is 625, okay. 25 × 25, 625. And now this becomes 6.25 times an hour and a half, okay. Now × 4 (h thick), latex going, has the square of the distance, and now it's going to take a whole day for something inside a 4-inch-thick plate.

p16 13:56

And so it turns out, when they were doing some of the foundations and G.E. Wilson things, they could put in half an inch of weld metal, they had to stop and make sure they keep the preheat on for like three or four hours just to allow the hydrogen out before you put more on top, okay. If you're doing armor steel back in the World War II, that's 17 inches thick, they had to go slow. Actually they had to go, so they went slow anyway because then stick electrodes and where clause and will die quickly, but if you didn't allow time for the hydrogen to diffuse out you had a problem.

p17 14:30

I can't remember — oh, it was the Fore River Bridge where Quincy Shipping are — you still being state of Massachusetts is building a new — we don't, rich — drawbridge. And they got some things, ships at heart, from 8 inches thick of a high-strength steel, highly alloyed, very difficult to weld. And I told them, you've got to stop every half-inch for two hours and diffuse the hydrogen atoms. At what the, think people never heard of, going to very thick steel you've got to stop to give time to the hydrogen to diffuse out, otherwise you just, traffic will be trapped forever. You start going through the diffusion equation, you're not going to get it out of there. We're going to get cracks before it all happens. So you have to worry about steel thickness as well.

p18 15:25

Part of the problem, and I think I pose this, is, people would call me and say, well, we want to weld type-of-touch [type of such-and-such], how do we do it? And I'd ask, what's the composition, what's the thickness — those are the two things I needed to know.

p19 15:51

Another thing that we talked about, then we're going to go over again, is this microstructure, tensile strength of stress, and hydrogen. Here's a nice Venn diagram to tell you what the situation is, in terms of, you want — each one of these circles, so it's going to be an intersection where everything's on track. Now we have this one. This is actually a plot that tells you how much hydrogen you can expect from different welding processes. You go to some of the books on welding steel without hydrogen cracking, this is well, hydrogen level, in either milliliters per 100 grams weld deposit, essentially within ten percent. This is the same number as parts per million hydrogen in the steel deposit. Here's your shielded metal arc, these stick electrodes, way up here. Even with two-tenths of a percent moisture here — even with two-tenths of a percent moisture, which is the lowest level you can get, you're going to be up around the potential, well over 100 parts per million. But in fact, if you have your freaking everything, you can still get things now, long before, okay. Typical basic welds, these are baked electrodes, at 350 to 450 °C. Titanium dioxide electrodes or lime electrodes, different types of coatings, you can be much higher, and you'll get much higher, like 10 parts per million, 20 parts per million hydrogen, and you're going to get cracking. This will crack HY-80 [steel], some of this will crack HY-100 [steel]. If you really want to do a 100, you should be down to this range.

p20 17:46

We have flux core welding that built bridges. I remember the electric boat brought in down here 25 years ago, and they built a new kind of administration building where the cafeteria is right down the road there. And they took me to lunch in a couple of welding engineers, this pretty nice building, this is, dad was welded with what score. So don't jump up and down, okay. Flux work is a hike, it's a solid wire process, sumby gas metal arc, accepted this number one, song work, the wire is hollow, and inside it has some net flux. So here are the Flex is on the outside, here in flexes on the inside, much more productive process, also can be fairly high in hydrogen. The lowest hydrogen is gas metal arc, this is what you typically use, picking on the hole of the ships now. It's not true 30 years ago, but today closely guess how r, and you can get fairly little hydrogen because it only thought you from grease and moisture or looking on the water to places like that. So we keep pushing for better controls, which some air gasping our code wire and speeding through that.

p21 19:01

Student: [question about where the water's coming from]

p22 19:05

Yeah, I actually, you have a little nozzle, the copper tip that has a hole in it, and you have a wire feeder, a little spool of wire, you have some rollers pushing it through this little nozzle, and the arc is struck to that wire just like this is a non-continuous wire. With gas tungsten arc, they could have a hundred-pound drum of wire. See, where it's like the tungsten Bednar in that, that's gas tungsten arc, is that in the same part. That's even lower than this part, okay, because you weld much slower. I've got something in here that the deposition rates, I'm just wearing the same spot on that, charges you can think of it as the same spot as gas-metal-arc-welding is sort of, sir overlaps in terms of central high ovation.

p23 20:06

You know, we haven't gotten into it yet, but there's lots of formulas for what we call carbon equivalent. It's a measure of the hardenability. So you take all these alloying elements and you know carbon will give you hardness and alloy elements give you hardenability. Well for welding, people talk about carbon equivalent, and over the last 80 years there are lots of different formulas. This is not all, okay, which is the right one to use. When this was developed for high-strength low-alloy steels, it's got niobium, because that's how they get the strength is in the low alloy. Everybody wants to come up with their own thing in terms of carbon equivalent. We're going to go through the American Welding Society code and show you the [formula] department.

p24 21:00

But what they are, the fractions is representing, like one of our carbon, 1/30, part silicon, or without of attraction. Silicon's 1/30th is effective at hardening steel as carbon, in person ison. Silicon will add, hardens steel similar to carbon, but at one-and-one-thirtieth percent is effective, okay. So you can get great depth of hardening, which is hardenability. But this is a measure of carbon equivalent, how much hardness and you get. But you also get hardness when you have these other alloying elements, they don't just get depth, they also get an increasing, okay. But it so they're all careful formulas, everybody wants to own their own empirical formula.

p25 21:46

This is what I really wanted to get to, as we haven't really talked about it: this is hydrogen-free samples. This is the notch tensile strength, so it's like ripping the piece of paper, that will not, you put your steel as a function of temperature. Turns out right here at room temperature is the greatest embrittlement of hydrogen. I mentioned before that if you wanted to measure the hydrogen in the steel in the laboratory, you'd quench it, put it in liquid nitrogen, because it takes forever, you're slowing this D is now down to, finalized at minus, in liquid nitrogen, and you can run one for three or four days before you do your chemical analysis and still measure your hydrogen, okay. Because you've got three or four orders of magnitude slower diffusion. At higher temperatures you're going to find the stuff diffuses out more quickly, okay. At 250 degrees, I got the data here somewhere, I showed that, you simply that before, but it might be 10⁻⁴ at 250 degrees with a preheat. And so the hydrogen's diffusing out more rapidly. Turns out, nature has it that room temperature is absolutely the worst, okay. You're losing — that one — okay, so that's just the way it is and we have to live with it.

p26 23:09

Student: Why in this graph at higher temperature, it looks like increasing the strength?

p27 23:22

Yeah, well the strength — this is a brittleness test, and so hydrogen-free samples are not, otherwise increasing the temperature, that's a weak Petro of it. I don't know if there's a really good data for that, okay. He may have had that, but he may have actually had a little bit of hydrogen. Here, free samples or whatever, there's scatter around this thing, and I bet the scatter is great as the slope, okay. But there is definitely a difference here, I mean there's the order banking dues, you can lose 75 percent of your strength through the hydrogen room, okay. So all of a sudden your design which was good for fifty percent of strength is two times overloaded in terms of embrittlement. So we do have to worry about it.

p28 24:09

So now let me give you an example, this, the last elements we have, of this Venn diagram. This is one of my earliest. This is microstructure. [Tom draws or points to the Venn diagram.] This is stress. This is how you cope with that. So I was like 28 or 29 years old, I was a young faculty member, could the firm feed my family, remember what it's like. And you know remember, I would an innocent but I can't afford to feed my family, was born he ate, okay, now the salary of an assistant professor.

p29 24:59

And so I got a phone call from what used to be the boss Navy [Boston Navy Yard] — or honor to have such a thing, but is, that I guess the Constitution of it. And it wasn't there, the Constitution, of Charleston exactly, downtown somewhere else. And they had a destroyer that was supposed to go out in one week, and for six weeks they had been trying to weld chromoly tubing in the steam system to stainless steel. And the Navy spec said you must use an Incanel [Inconel] base color mode. And they had been trying that, had people come up, Philadelphia Navy Yard, some Navy welders, they tried, and they kept on getting cracks, okay.

p30 25:48

This is just a little one-inch tube of stainless steel and they had to join — [Tom draws the joint geometry] — like this, machine below my back, and they had to make it in the vertical position because that's the way the boots were in the destroyer. And they had to put in a root pass, and whenever they tried to do it, you know, they got a crack. They found they could do it with stainless steel — this was stainless steel to chromoly steel going, for a problem, mate, legalism, a high carbon — high chromoly steel for pressure systems, stainless steel is even higher than that too — but this is just an transition joint. Every time they tried to make it crack, they tried preheating, they tried all kinds of things, and they couldn't get it to work. So they call MIT and I was the only one, and I needed the money, so they said, we want you to come down and tell the Navy why we should be able to do this with stainless steel. And I, nicolau away, and I didn't know if this would work.

p31 27:01

So I say a little bit lately, try to get home at five o'clock, the little kids, until they went to bed, and I stay late, I go to the library, and I find an article in journal ten years later [earlier], if you weld it with stainless steel it's going to crack on you, because the carbon will diffuse around and form some carbides with some of the things that are in the stainless steel, and you'll get something that would hold them — new name for that — but it's basically a long-term, when you're at temperature, shift over time the carbon diffuses, and you'll get cracking. So I knew I couldn't come and tell the Navy, hey just get respect, it's okay to do you stainless steel and they'll get, we did it out of the yard.

p32 27:56

So I come down and I have a copy of the paper with me, and I meet with someone in a conference room, and they didn't tell me you all to be over, but I said, well, you can't, you're gonna have to think about, just like the spec says. But let's talk about why you're having a problem. So they showed me, and I asked some questions about all these things, hydrogen, check the composition of moisture in the shielding gas, they had, couldn't do much about the microstructure. This, you know, this was the chromoly steel, the stainless, with the filler metal in between, and that's what the Navy had.

p33 28:37

The only thing I could think of in this half-hour, 45-minute discussion, as I was quizzing them and they were quizzing me — they weren't real happy because I wasn't just wonder like, letter, maybe say oh it's okay problem, porque estoy — I said, well I'll tell you what. Why don't you try, instead of the joint groove that looks like that, why don't you machine one that looks like this, so that when you weld it you can put your root pass in here rather than putting a root pass in here and getting a big deal right here. And that will reduce your stress because you have some flexibility, buh-buh-bah, and we'll try to mess it. Goodbye, let me know how it works out. They said, no, we'll do it while you're here.

p34 29:47

And so we go out and they take a couple pieces of pipe, they put them on the lathe, achete it, guys we don't got enough of a length here, ethics just a little more. So then they go, they do it, TIG weld, that's what you do, fight typically particular group past, may be slow, it's great that, my body. Well, they do the TIG weld and then they have to let it slow cool, they wrap it in insulation to let it slow cool, little, do about hydrogen to come out, so maybe spec. And so we're standing around for 45 minutes while it's cooling down, and the whole time the foreman did the machining and welding, and saying, this is not going to work, it's not going to work. And this guy's got 40 years experience, I got four years experience, who do you think's going to be right? I was just thinking, look at my watch, singing, and there's somewhere I have to be.

p35 30:42

So then he takes the insulation off and cools down, and he takes the first of all, I guess clean it with the dye penetrant, solvent, sprays that on, and then a bit calm and steady sprays on the penetrant, you got to let that penetrant for five minutes, okay. So I'm not going to work. And then he finally holds it up and sprays the white dog [developer], developer turning it around. I walked out of there. [Tom mimes walking off.] Oh, okay. I don't know if they got the chip out of that, I've, I just got my for the doctor's aware, but I could have walked out, and I had no idea except no, that's on the bells, and I knew, I could, they do it as good a job, I quizzed him about the whole getting rid of the hydrogen, no breeze so there'll moisture, you're shielding, and they checked all those things. About when the microstructure was going to be whatever it was, and this is how we had used, the only thing I could think of is how to lower the stress. It was sort of a shot in the dark, and it works.

p36 31:56

That's been it, stress, of a structure, of mother, right. And then actually once you got the root pass, I think the spec allows you to use something else afterwards or whatever, but they knew that, they put in final test it was just that root pass they couldn't get crack-free, okay. And by just changing the joint job, so this actually gets to the point of, is the only tool you have as a hammer, you see every problem is a nail. The people that came up from Philadelphia, hydrogen down and, but then everybody thought of it as the welding metallurgy problem. Well it gets solved as welding metallurgy, while the solution is a welding residual stress problem, okay. So anyway, so one of my early successes that no idea how, sometimes, okay, thanks.