§1. ASTM, AWS, and the business of codes and standards [00:03]
Commercial standards bodies write their own technology and run their own standards. You won't find an ASTM standard outside of books like this. [Tom holds up a thick bound volume.] This is the book on ships and marine technology. I have the 1998 version in my office. I actually have a shelf like this of ASTM standards. The steel standards are about that thick — there are seven or eight volumes. The first set of ASTM standards, a hundred years ago, were basically steel standards. Now they have them for insulation, anything you can think of. The entire shelf, if you had a full set, would take twenty feet along the wall and cost you fifty or a hundred thousand dollars.
However, if you Google an ASTM standard and you're a registered MIT user with the libraries, it will pop up. My computer now, over the last six months, when I'm looking for an ASTM standard, gives me a pop-up that says, would you like to download this for free from the MIT computer? MIT libraries owns them. That's what your tuition goes for — maintaining the libraries. So we have these books of standards. I have some of them because I use them fairly often.
[Tom holds up another standard.] Human engineering design for marine systems, equipment, and facilities. There's a standard for human engineering on Navy ships. There's a structural welding code for steel — every bridge and building in the United States is built to this code, because virtually every state has incorporated it into their building codes. You cannot get your building certified otherwise. It's made by the American Welding Society by a committee, but once it's adopted by the states into their building codes, it has the force of law. Your OSHA standards and things like that usually call out standards like this. I actually have a module in this course on codes and standards, whether good or bad for innovation.
I just got this one for free because I grade their welding engineer exams. What I get for grading is a $1200 book, free books which cost them next to nothing. All sixty standards referenced by AWS in the structural welding code are compiled in here. This is the second edition. Just the structural welding code itself takes up about this much space, because it's for steel. There's one for aluminum, one for titanium, one for stainless steels, one for repair welding. They make money. Thirty years ago you could buy one of these for seventy-five bucks; now it's four hundred. I remember Gaskell's cost twenty-five back in the late fifties.
I can show you some x-ray radiographs that I buy from ASTM with cracking — radiographic film. I bought those fifteen years ago for three hundred dollars. Today it's fifteen hundred. Over the last twenty years the professional societies that sell the standards have determined this is a great money-making tool. About twenty years ago, the American Welding Society started collecting money for certifying welders. A welder has to be certified — not for Navy welding, but for commercial welding — and there are certification fees. American Welding's total assets, back in the mid-nineties, were about two or three million dollars. They published it last month: they're worth a hundred million dollars today, twenty years later. They're making money certifying welders, and now internet-based certified welding engineers.
You can't build anything without standards. You have to go to all the Navy standards. You can't even turn a valve on the ships without looking it up in the book. Turn the wrong valve, you could kill a few people, okay.
§2. Stainless steel composition and the Schaeffler diagram [06:25]
I'm going to catch up on a few things from the stainless steel lectures. This is molybdenum content. I told you to put molybdenum in stainless steel for corrosion resistance. This is the critical pitting temperature — at what temperature can you avoid pitting problems? Here's 316 stainless steel. 317 is kind of medical grade; the L versions help, because they form fewer carbides. AL-6 — this is what the Navy wants to make submarines out of. You can see why: the ocean can get pretty corrosive, and if you made it out of some other stainless you'd end up pitting your submarine. Most of them, they looked at it and they've given up. That was something of ten or fifteen years ago — the all stainless steel submarine. They've given up on the technology before that. They've been worrying about that for a while.
If you're welding, this is a Schaeffler diagram. The Schaeffler diagram basically tells you that when you have low chrome, low nickel alloying — for example down here — you've just got a carbon steel, martensite. Over here, a lot of chrome, you'll be very ferritic; a lot of nickel, you'll be austenitic up here — face-centered cubic, body-centered cubic. Here's where 304 sits — garden-variety, a little more richly alloyed — and 310 is very heavily alloyed up here. If you're trying to weld dissimilar materials — I talked about welding the chromoly steel boiler tube to the stainless steel boiler tube for that destroyer back in 1978 or 1979 — when you mix those metals, you're going to hit something in the weld metal that's some combination of the weld electrode and base material in solution. If you're diluted very little, your weld metal composition will be mostly the electrode. If a lot, you'll be down here near the base material. Obviously you can get martensite if you don't do this properly.
§3. Egyptian Abrams tanks: dissimilar-metal welding and dilution [09:23]
My example of that: thirty years ago I had a student working at Army Research Labs over here in Watertown, working on hydrogen cracking of armor steels for the Army. He called me up. The State Department was all over the US Army because they'd agreed to sell the Egyptians these tanks. They were being built in Lima, Ohio. Anybody from Ohio? This is why I like Lima beans. Lima, Ohio is where the US Army's tank plants were — building Abrams for the Egyptian army. They were building some older model, but they were having a problem. As I told you, when the Navy started welding HY-80, this was one of the first cases too. They basically couldn't solve a hydrogen cracking problem, so they used austenitic stainless steel filler metal. The austenitic stainless steel will dissolve ten times the hydrogen, and it's ten times more resistant than a carbon ferritic steel weld. So they decided to weld the Egyptian tanks with austenitic stainless steel — only they didn't worry about how much dilution. Depending on the weld metal they were using, they were getting cracking.
Here's the martensite boundary. If you compare it — this is martensite, this is austenite, martensite, austenite. So somewhere here are some martensite boundaries. All these guys are showing is that if you mix, if you're welding dissimilar metals like armor steel with a stainless steel, and you don't have the right ratio of base metal melted to weld metal melted, you'll end up with martensite streaming. Martensite is very susceptible — essentially impossible not to get hydrogen cracking, even with just the residual hydrogen that's in here. You're screwed.
So he calls me up at six o'clock. The State Department is complaining because we're welding Egyptian tanks and we're shipping them full of cracks. The Egyptians were unhappy, the State Department was embarrassed.
§4. Farberware pot cracking on the boat to Japan [12:17]
Another story on stainless steel. [Tom produces a Farberware pot.] This is probably twenty years old. Farberware came to me through the MIT Industrial Liaison Program. They're members and they can get free consulting. They paid back then about an hour of the faculty member's time. In the 1980s I got more ILP consulting than any other faculty member at MIT. I did a lot of failure analysis — I used to have three or four companies a week coming in. They tell me their problem and I shoot them an answer just like that.
Farberware brought this pot in and said: we're making these stainless steel pots, 304 stainless steel, garden-variety. It's got aluminum on the bottom — that's an interesting story too. We ship them, some of them to Japan, and when they show up in Japan they've got cracks. They didn't have cracks when they left. Well, if you know anything about 304 stainless steel — they were making stainless steel pots, why didn't they know about this?
It turns out that with 304, when you stretch it you can get martensite. You can get martensite by quenching and changing the temperature, but you can also get martensite from austenite in 304, which is actually metastable. When you stretch it and deform it, it will transform by strain-induced martensite. When you take a flat disc of stainless steel and punch it into a forming die to make a pot, you get more deformation at the top than at the bottom. The very bottom has no deformation — it starts out as a circle and ends up as a circle. This stuff up here gets bent, gets compressed and stretched. The magnetism is a function of how much deformation is in the stainless. The deformed material is partially body-centered tetragonal martensite. This stuff down here is not susceptible to hydrogen cracking; this stuff up here is.
So I explained: this is why it's cracking. It was delayed cracking. How did I know? When they put it on the boat in New York — the manufacturing site is in Brooklyn — and got it to Tokyo, it didn't have cracks; then a week and a half or two weeks later, it did have cracks. So it was cracking on the boat — delayed cracking. The only thing that causes really crappy delayed cracking in steels that I know of is hydrogen. So then I had to figure out where they were getting the hydrogen. I knew that's strain martensite in 304. But where's the hydrogen coming from? You start out with a sheet of 304 — where does the hydrogen come from? They said, well, do you think it has anything to do with the fact that, to get good bonding of the polymer coating on the inside, we take stainless steel powder and plasma spray it on the inside to make a very rough surface that we can then impregnate the plastic into, so it sticks really well? And we're using argon with five percent nitrogen as the gas for plasma spray. I said: yeah, that'll do it. Problem solved.
Plasma spraying: they take stainless steel powders, they have a plasma torch — an arc welding torch — and they inject the powders into the plume of the plasma, which is at five percent nitrogen, absolute super hot, ten thousand degrees Kelvin. It's pretty hot. If you go fast you can run your finger through a candle; I've done it through a welding arc. If you go quickly, it's just hot. When it cools down quickly, it traps the hydrogen.
They make the pot, put it in a box — it might have even cracked before they knew, before the guy left the dock. But it was inside the box, packaged up. The cracking occurs within a week. These cracks have gotten longer over time, because you've got the residual stress. You can put susceptible material — the original material wasn't even susceptible — but once they formed it, then you have the residual stress from the forming operation. I got an all-expenses-paid trip to the Farberware plant to look at other problems. They paid me a couple thousand dollars besides, twenty years ago. My rate now is probably $150.
§5. The trip to Brooklyn and the New York City building beam [18:27]
So you show up in Brooklyn. This is not the nicest area of Brooklyn, it's sort of industrial. The cabdriver dropped me off and said, "I'm going, okay, let's go." It was just after Christmas, as I remember, and there was snow all over the ground, on the sidewalks. I didn't know which side of the building was the entrance. The cabdriver dropped me off, I went to the door and it was bolted. Really well bolted. There are no real windows in this building either, and it's a city block in size. So I started trudging through about three feet of snow on the sidewalks. Snow in New York is very clean. I went more than three-quarters of the way around the building before I found a door that wasn't completely bolted shut. Not necessarily a great neighborhood. Finally I found a door I could get in, and I went in and saw the plant.
I had another example in New York City once. Everybody knows the George Washington Bridge into New York City. You come over the bridge and then it goes underneath the highway, the other highway. One time there was this thirty- or forty-story apartment building. They said, we've got a crack in one of the structural beams — ten-foot-tall web, holding up this twenty-story building. This is the beam that, if you were driving through the tunnel, you'd look up and that would be the beam holding up the building. And there's a crack in it. I said, give me an address. The taxi speeds off out of that neighborhood. I look around — everything's bolted up — and I go and knock —