§1. Closing on fracture mechanics [00:02]
Particularly suddenly, near the speed of sound, it creates two new surfaces. Griffith balanced that. He did an energy balance and said, is my elastic strain energy greater than the energy of forming two new surfaces? And if it is, then I'll get a crack that runs catastrophically. If the strain energy is less than the energy to form some new surface, then I won't get a fast-running crack. That's what it is. When you're doing the energy balance, you get these funny units, but the easiest thing is to just think of it as a bending moment opening up on this thing. So it's a stress times the crack length, except the crack length is to the three-halves power in metric units, and to the one-half power in U.S. units. The easiest thing is just think of it as a simple bending moment on a cantilever beam on the crack. The only thing that's convenient is mega-Pascal meters to the three-halves is equal to 1.1 ksi square root of inch. So they're almost the same — within ten percent — and I don't have to do a lot of conversion.
Student: [Question about units, inaudible.]
If you think about it, mega-Pascals is a force per unit area times the length would be a bending moment, right. This is not quite times just the length, it's times the length to the one-half power, but that's because of this energy balance that Griffith did. It's basically a thermodynamic analysis of energies being equal.
§2. Presentation logistics [02:07]
So let me start. We've only got two more days of lecture. Today I'm going to do steel — the history and where it's come and why it's gotten to be a relatively low cost, high volume material. And tomorrow I'm going to go through glass, because it's sort of the antithesis: a very brittle material that we use as a structural material, and all the things we do to glass to give it toughness, and some of the history of how glass has changed over time. I always kind of liked the history part of things. Maybe I should have been a historian.
The presentation schedule is posted on Stellar — rev 2, last Thursday afternoon, and I think I've accommodated the mistakes I made. If you make a switch, just let me know. There are only about five names that change position. And if you can't make the presentation for some reason, you can videotape it and Dr. Belmar and I will watch. We won't start presentations till a week from today. Dr. Belmar will be here the first two days because I'll be in South Carolina, but then I'll be doing all the rest of the days. We're not going to just put them on YouTube for the world to see. Does that make some students even more nervous? Does anyone know what the greatest human fear is? It's not public speaking — I think it's acrophobia, or agoraphobia. Fear of public speaking is worse than spiders or rats — for Indiana Jones, right.
§3. Steel's place on the Ashby plot, and the "silicon age" myth [04:21]
Okay, so let's talk a little bit about steels. I've pointed out a number of times that steels have this sort of not unique but nearly unique position on a fracture toughness versus strength Ashby plot. They're way out here to the upper left, which is where you want to be: high toughness at reasonable strength. The way Ashby draws the big envelope for metals, steels kind of lead the pack. There are some specialty steels that are better — they don't even have that much iron in them — that have more toughness, but they're also extremely expensive and we don't use them in the same ways.
We talked about the ages of man — the Stone Age, because that's what people used for tools, then the Bronze Age and the Iron Age. Today they say we're in the silicon age, but in terms of structural material, silicon's not a structural material. In terms of structural materials we're still in the Iron Age. People like to think that in terms of economics we're in the silicon age, that information technology is a bigger business than structural materials. Is that true? How would you measure it?
First of all, it's not true, in terms of volume of material. Steel's a trillion-ton industry — at a thousand dollars a ton, roughly, that's a trillion-dollar industry. What's the value of the world gross domestic product? Somewhere 50, 60 trillion dollars a year. So two percent of the world economy is just making steel. People would say, well, semiconductors go into computers and they have higher value, and that's absolutely true, but semiconductors are not a trillion-dollar industry, they're about a three hundred billion dollar industry. About one-third the size of steel. Semiconductors go into things like computers and cell phones, but steel goes into things like railroads and bridges and buildings and cars, and those are pretty large businesses too. In the long run, structural materials is still a larger business than silicon. But silicon is a little more dramatic because you can get all these fancy things that we use all the time, and people really don't think about driving over a bridge unless it collapses while they're driving over it. Then they get all hot and bothered about it, but otherwise it's sort of taken for granted.
I wrote an article about that about twenty-five years ago, that the structural materials industry doesn't get a lot of credit because what we've done essentially is a revolution, not in the number of transistors on a chip, but in productivity — tons per hour of production. And in fact, we have come a long way in terms of tons per hour of production.
§4. The first energy crisis: Britain, charcoal, and the Weald [08:22]
There's this book from Penn State University — there's a twelve-hour PBS series done back in the 1990s called The Impact of Metals on the History of Mankind. Pennsylvania is a state that has lots of steel companies, so they're interested in the history of metals. About halfway through, they start talking about the first energy crisis, which I've mentioned briefly before.
In Britain in the 16th century, the 1500s, the Weald today is a broad expanse of gently rolling hills and vales, but it was once dense forest with mature oaks, beech, and chestnut. Chestnuts were huge trees — we don't have many anymore because of the chestnut blight that occurred about a hundred years ago that wiped out the chestnuts in North America. But they were 200-foot-tall majestic beautiful trees, and they had them in England. By the 16th century the Weald was dotted with blast furnaces and forges, each surrounded by an expanding patch of cleared land. Why? Because in order to make iron — which some people would say was a military necessity, you had to make cannon so you could defeat those French or those Spanish — you had to make cast iron.
To make cast iron, you take iron ore and carbon as charcoal, because they didn't have coal mines in the 16th century. You'd take trees and burn them — a big pile of trees, cover it with dirt, blow some air in the one end. In a rarefied atmosphere they would burn off all the organics in the wood and leave behind charcoal. Build a huge pile of trees, pack the top with earth, with a little chamber where you blow air in the bottom, so it burns slowly. When you're done, you starve it of oxygen, close off the inlet, let it cool down, take the dirt off, and you have a big pile of charcoal. That charcoal can be used to reduce the iron ore — iron oxide — into carbon monoxide and iron metal. But it also has lots of carbon, so it ends up being an iron-four-percent-carbon alloy, which we know is cast iron. They had blast furnaces reducing the iron ore with the charcoal, making iron for cannons.
To build one of these huge ships, the Victory, Nelson's flagship at Trafalgar, contained two thousand one hundred tons of oak. They were wooden ships. So you had two competing sources for the trees in England. And then all of a sudden in the 16th century came along a third, which was to make glass. To make glass you also needed a very clean fire which was made with charcoal. You might start with sand and other things, but you still ended up needing charcoal.
So in 1558 a law was passed forbidding the felling of trees to make coal for the burning of iron, but the Weald of Kent and Sussex was excepted — just like politicians haven't changed. They pass a law and say you can't do something, but all the lobbyists come in. The lobbying of the iron industry got them to exempt the region where it was critical. So they're still tearing down the trees in the Weald, which was the middle of Britain. Then by 1581, just 23 years later, the shortage of wood was so great — first of all, the price had risen from a penny to two shillings. How much increase is that? What's two shillings in pence? 24 pence — 12 pence to a shilling. So a 24-fold increase in the price of wood. Just like the energy crisis we had with the Arab oil embargo.
By 1581 the shortage was so great that a further act was passed: you couldn't cut down trees anywhere within 22 miles of the Thames River, because that's where all the shipyards were for building ships, within 4 miles of the Great Forest of the Weald, or within three miles of the coastline anywhere. So England was facing an energy crisis.
§5. Saugus Ironworks and colonial iron [13:24]
What did they do? Well, someone had discovered North America, so they came over, and the first iron mill was Saugus Ironworks, right up here in Saugus, Massachusetts. It's a national historical site. They have it rebuilt and you can go up there and see the iron master's house, which is a 17th century home. You can see the blast furnace they built, and they basically got the iron ore out of the bogs and neighboring swamps. They used oyster shells for their flux — they needed calcium carbonate. Oyster shells are calcium carbonate. You don't have to dig a mine to get your limestone, just go to the original oysters that created the limestone. They could make eight tons of iron per week up here at Saugus. That started in 1642. It failed by 1688 as a result of litigation, nuisance suits, and the reduction of timber resources. They were tearing down all the trees around here too.
But other iron mills grew up in other locations. There's all kinds of forges all up and down the Chesapeake Bay in the early 18th century. There was also Colonial Williamsburg and Jamestown. Anyone been to Jamestown or Colonial Williamsburg? I went to high school in Virginia Beach, and whenever someone came to visit, my mother would take them up to see Williamsburg, which is this old colonial town. The Roosevelts — some wealthy family — decided to give lots of money to Colonial Williamsburg and they rebuilt a lot of it. It was the capital of Virginia in the 1600s, early 1700s. It's right there at the College of William and Mary. About 20, 25 miles away is Jamestown, which was the first settlement in Virginia.
It was both bar stock and some finished goods. They developed up here in Saugus a way to cast iron cooking utensils in the dirt. A guy figured out a way to make a mold in the dirt. If you go up to Saugus, they have the blast furnace, and the casting floor is just an earthen floor. The thing is basically dirt — this is the top of the furnace and this is the bottom of the furnace. This is about two stories high, and they would take their wheelbarrows of charcoal and oyster shells and iron ore, and dump them in the top. At the bottom they actually had certain types of refractory stone that wouldn't melt.
With your carbon from your wood and your iron oxide — Fe₂O₃ mostly, maybe some Fe₃O₄ — this stuff would get hot because the blast furnace had a blast of air. They had a waterwheel going over this that had a bellows blowing air in, to keep it up to about a thousand, twelve hundred degrees Fahrenheit. You get molten iron on the bottom, and you have a little clay stop at the bottom. About twice a day you'd go in there with an iron tool and break open that stop and it would run out on the dirt floor. Blast furnaces today at a big steel mill are not much different. They have a big floor about 10 feet deep with dirt. It would run down, and they would just dig a trough in the dirt, and then off that they would have other smaller little things — molds for the pig iron.
Anybody know what this was called? This is a great big heavy thing, weighs about a thousand pounds. It's called the sow bar. What's a sow? It's a female pig. These are piglets. That's the pig iron. This is a sow bar. The sow bar may later be forged into a cannon barrel. But this would be a big heavy thing that would take horses and men to lift into the forge shop. The pig iron would be made into things that would go to some blacksmith. There's a blacksmith shop up there at Saugus, and they would beat them into wrought iron and other things. So they were making cast objects. Simple little kitchen utensils — the bigger ones they used to do their laundry, and to cook their soup in.
§6. From hand forging to Bessemer [20:25]
It all came out of this one shop, and it was limited by how many trees were around. If you cut down everything for 10 miles around, you had to move your blast furnace somewhere else. I estimated one time — this actually is a lecture on productivity — if they were doing eight tons a week, that would probably be something like, at hand forging, if people worked 60-hour weeks — you didn't get a lot of vacation time back then — that would be about one person-year per ton, 3,000 hours per ton.
And that stayed the same. From making cast iron — I'm sure there was some improvement, and I did this on a log scale, and probably got a factor of three productivity over the next couple of hundred years. Then Henry Bessemer in Sheffield, England came along in the 1850s. Bessemer came up with the Bessemer converter. We needed a Bessemer converter because we did not know how to melt steel. What's the melting temperature of steel? It's about 1500 Celsius. In Fahrenheit it's about 2,500 Fahrenheit.
[Tom applies a torch flame to a piece of steel.] If I take a flame here — this is something similar, but don't tell the Safety Office — I take a piece of steel, I can hold it there all day long and it will not melt. Gets soft, but it won't melt. The temperature of that flame is around 2,100, 2,200 Fahrenheit. This melts at 2,500 to 2,600. So it doesn't melt, just gets hot. This is hotter than the blacksmith's forge. Not a lot hotter — if he's got the bellows going and charcoal in his forge, he can get to 2,000, 2,100. This is more like 2,300 as the flame. But you could hold it there all day with no stress on it and it will not melt. It might oxidize away back to the iron oxide, but it won't melt.
So we needed some way to melt steel, because there was no carbon flame — which was our source of fuel — that would melt steel. Along came the Bessemer converter. It was just a big vessel that you pour the cast iron — which is high in carbon — into, and you blow air in. The shape of the vessel was such that when you blew the cold air in, the exiting hot gases — basically carbon monoxide — would preheat the air coming in. It wasn't a very efficient system, because you've got to get oxygen in there to get the process going. But Bessemer showed you could get higher temperatures if you preheated your air. You get a higher temperature flame by preheating the air. So Bessemer taught people in the 1850s that if you preheated the air, you could end up making steel.
Before that, the only steel we had were steel swords, and they had all been made by solid-state diffusion. The Japanese would take iron ore and charcoal, bury it in the sand on a beach and ignite it, blow some air into it, and make sponge iron — called sponge iron because it's a hollow metal that looked like a sponge. A blacksmith would take that, heat it up, and pound it into something solid, and it would make swords. Those swords were very valuable. Took thousands and thousands of person-hours per ton. It was an important part of their economy.
§7. Carnegie, and a story about my grandfather [25:11]
Along comes Bessemer, and we have this tremendous drop in person-hours per ton. We got to Andrew Carnegie and economies of scale, and about a factor of 30 increase in productivity. Andrew Carnegie becomes the richest man in the world, richer than Bill Gates today in constant dollars, by starting big steel companies where they were building railroads in the United States. Andrew Carnegie was a Scotsman.
I have a story about Andrew Carnegie and my grandfather. My grandfather grew up in the South in the Civil War — he never got much education. He was trying to start the University of Chattanooga, Tennessee — he'd been mayor of Chattanooga — and he needed $25,000 because one of the Rockefellers had given them a $250,000 challenge grant. They needed a half-million dollars to build this university. They'd raised all the money they could in Tennessee. My great-grandfather, who had been Secretary of the Treasury, was in New York, and he knew Andrew Carnegie. He got an appointment for my grandfather with Andrew Carnegie. My grandfather said, we'd like you to give us the last $25,000 which will, with Rockefeller's quarter-million-dollar challenge grant, allow us to build the University of Chattanooga. Andrew Carnegie said, well, I tend not to dabble in Mr. Rockefeller's charities. As he's showing him to the door, my grandfather said, well, people in the South really need some education. The South was a very poor disadvantaged area at the time after Reconstruction. Andrew Carnegie looked at him and said, sir, how much education do you have? My grandfather said, 13 months. Andrew Carnegie said, come back tomorrow, I'll give you my answer.
He came back the next day, and there was a check for twenty-five thousand dollars. Andrew Carnegie had left to go to Pittsburgh, but the secretary gave him the check. He said, Mr. Carnegie wanted you to know that he also had only thirteen months of education. Andrew Carnegie funded a lot of universities. He was very big as a philanthropist on education. My grandfather, in his autobiography, said he figured if he had 12 or 14 months and not 13, he probably wouldn't have gotten the money, because he and Andrew Carnegie both had 13 months of education. He got the money and started the university anyway.
§8. Open hearth, basic oxygen, and continuous casting [28:12]
There was this big drop from Bessemer to Carnegie, and then the next big drop, another factor of a hundred or so, came a little bit later. Andrew Carnegie had built huge things called basic open-hearth furnaces, where it would take you a day or two to melt two or three hundred tons of steel in a big furnace. To preheat the air, you'd have a bunch of brickwork — two of these on either side of the basic open hearth. This brickwork was a big latticework, sort of like a big sponge, about half the size of a football field and two or three stories tall. When you start up your furnace — these things would run for a couple of years at a time — all the exit gases would go out through cold brickwork, heating it up. About once or twice a day you'd switch the flow, so the cold air would come in through the hot brickwork and exit through the cold brickwork. You just keep oscillating between the two brickworks, which were the preheaters for your air. It took about 24 hours to melt a couple hundred tons of steel.
After World War II, some guys in Austria decided there was another way to do it if they used pure oxygen. So today we have what's called the basic oxygen furnace. The basic open hearth got as large as 400 tons — U.S. Steel built one in the early 1970s. Meanwhile, in the 1950s, this little firm in Austria decided to build a water-cooled copper lance and a vessel that looked not all that different from Bessemer's. You put 50 tons — today it's about 300 tons — of cast iron that comes out of the blast furnace, and you blow a supersonic jet of liquid oxygen. You're blowing liquid oxygen in, but by the time it heats up and comes out, it's a supersonic jet of pure oxygen. And you can burn all the carbon out of that cast iron.
In the open hearth it takes 24 hours, plus it's just a surface reaction. Here you're hitting it with a supersonic jet, and the steel and flux form a froth. This vessel has the volume about five times the volume of the liquid. When you hit it with that supersonic jet, you form this foam of molten steel and limestone, and you're burning the carbon out with the oxygen. You can refine everything in 20 or 30 minutes. So today we can make steel in 20 or 30 minutes in this froth of pure oxygen.
This is another example of co-location — I told you about the glass factories and the beer plants. They build the liquid oxygen plant right next to the blast furnace, because you're pumping in liquid oxygen. This consumes over ten percent of all the liquid oxygen produced in the world. They just liquefy air, distill it, so you have liquid argon, liquid nitrogen, liquid oxygen. The liquid oxygen is mostly used to make steel. The liquid argon is extremely valuable. The liquid nitrogen is a waste by-product, which we now use to freeze broccoli and green beans. You need a cheap source of refrigeration, and a lot of it — you have all the liquid nitrogen you want at about twenty cents a liter, because it's a by-product of making steel. Liquid argon is also a by-product, but it costs like 10 or 20 times as much because it's more useful.
So that's how we've tremendously increased the productivity of refining steel. But we also did several other things at the same time. The amount of work necessary to make a ton of steel today is about 20 minutes a ton. When I made this slide ten years ago it was about a half an hour a ton. When I worked for a steel company in the mid-70s, half the cost was labor, half was raw materials. Today it's almost all raw materials. Iron ore comes from Brazil and Australia, coal comes from all over the world, the limestone is all over the world. Back in the old days everything was labor-intensive. Today, because of the productivity gains, making steel is mostly a question of raw materials. As a result, the price of steel today is less in constant dollars than it was 25 years ago.
§9. AOD and MIT's basement [34:18]
If you want to make a really clean steel for aerospace engines and nickel-based alloys, we do something called argon oxygen decarburization. You can only get the carbon down to about 300 parts per million in the BOF. If you want to get it down to 30 parts per million, you can blow some argon through. I can remember in the early 70s when I took thermo in this department, Tom King had us calculating the argon oxygen decarburization process. Why? Well, it had been invented right here at MIT, in the basement of Building 8.
This is a picture of the basement of Building 8 about 1920. It was a two-story high bay. The Nano Lab on the Infinite Corridor was up here in space, right here on the first floor. It wasn't until 1962 that the Ford Foundation gave them the money to take this and make it not a two-bay area. They had little furnaces here. When you went to the lab, this is the lab you would go to a hundred years ago at MIT, and you learned how to make steel or cast iron, or you might learn to assay for gold.
This is — out of the same book — the mining engineering and metallurgy courses of study. I think this is 1888 at MIT. Take physics, take German. Why did you have to take German? Because that's where all the science was done until after World War II. The great science nation of the world was Germany. Where did all the quantum mechanics guys — Planck — not all of them were German, de Broglie was French, and there were Danish. But all the great science was done over in Europe, mostly in Germany.
Why did it all of a sudden switch after World War II over here? Because we imported all those scientists. We left them in Europe starving, and we said, come over here, Wernher von Braun, we'll give you a home in Huntsville, Alabama, and you can build rockets. We did that to hundreds of the top German scientists, and that helped cement the United States as one of the leaders in science today. The other things in the course of study were fairly similar, but somewhere in here it said fire assaying. If you were going to be a metallurgist graduate from MIT in 1888, you had to learn how to assay and measure the chemistry of metals.
So in any case, the steel industry grew, but several things happened. There was AOD, the argon oxygen decarburization process. The basic science was done under John Chipman back in the 1950s by a guy named Krivsky. But it was basic science of steelmaking, and he didn't really invent the process until he went to a small steel company and they invented the AOD process. Virtually 99 percent of all stainless steel made today is made by the AOD process, which was at its roots right here in the bottom of Building 8.
§10. Continuous casting and the yield revolution [38:34]
They do other things to de-gas the steel, and then they cast the steel into a ladle, and then into a holding pot called a tundish. You have this seven-story building with the ladle, the tundish, and you cast the steel into a water-cooled copper mold. You can pass it into an ingot mold — we still do that with about five percent of the steel — but ninety-five percent of steel is continuously cast in a water-cooled, vibrating copper mold. The tundish is up here, the steel drops down, water-cooled copper, it solidifies a skin of solid steel, and that skin is held by rollers, with water spraying on it for seven stories. Because it's solidifying hot steel, you can bend it with those rolls, turn it so it goes horizontal, and continuously cast. The Japanese have run continuous casters for three or four years continuously, never stop.
This changed things from getting about 65% yield. When I worked at Bethlehem Steel, most things were ingot cast — great big cast iron ingot, may weigh three or four hundred tons. You'd pour the steel in, and as it solidified, you would get a pipe. As everything solidifies, the grains grow in from the sides, and you get a pipe, and you'd have to cut off the top third, send it back to the melt shop, remelt it. With the continuous caster, you fill this up continually, and instead of sixty-five percent yield — you sell 65 pounds out of a hundred pounds you cast — you now sell 97 pounds out of a hundred.
There was a guy who was an MIT grad when I was at Bethlehem Steel — he was just under vice president, in charge of yield improvement. They would have killed for one percent improvement in yield from sixty-five percent to sixty-six percent. Tremendous amount of profit. You could get twenty or thirty percent increase in profitability of the company if you could just get a one percent improvement in yield. This guy was in charge of doing whatever he could across this multi-billion dollar company. But with continuous casting, perfected by the Japanese in the 1970s, you could go to ninety-seven percent yield — thirty percent increase. All of a sudden, all the old ingot casting shops were dinosaurs.
§11. The 1980s shakeout and the rise of POSCO [41:30]
The new steel mills were very productive, and what happened in the 1980s — employment in the steel industry dropped from a half million people to 250,000 people. Not because it was a dying industry, but because between the BOF process that really took over in the 60s and continuous casting that took over in the 70s, the steel industry doubled its productivity within a 20-year time frame. We have an excess of steel mills in the world. What did the steel companies in the United States do? U.S. Steel, Bethlehem Steel — they'd sell one of their old plants to some third-world country, and they wouldn't realize that ten years later that third-world country would have dismantled that plant weighing thousands of tons, shipped it to their country, and they would be shipping steel back into the United States with their little labor rates, killing the U.S. steel companies in the marketplace.
In the meantime the Japanese had enough profitability they were building brand new steel mills. The Koreans decided to build a steel mill — actually it was the premier of Korea who said, if we're going to be a major shipbuilding country — this is the early 1970s, I think 1972 — they needed to produce steel, they couldn't just always buy it from the Japanese. Koreans hate the Japanese — they were slaves to the Japanese all through the 1930s, so there's not exactly a lot of love lost there. The Koreans partnered with U.S. Steel. U.S. Steel gave them the engineering. They built a company with the government of Korea. The guy put in charge of it was Colonel Park, who worked for President Park, who was the premier of Korea. Colonel Park built POSCO Steel. I used to be the POSCO professor, because in the late 90s, 25 years later, POSCO Steel became the world's largest steel company, larger than Nippon Steel.
They built a brand new steel company in 1972. Building a brand new steel company is a 15 billion dollar venture. It's the same as Intel building a new ultra-fine-scale fab shop. It's the same as Boeing deciding to build a 787 Dreamliner. These 15 billion dollar investments will sink a company if they're not successful. Bethlehem Steel built the last large-scale steel mill in the world financed by a private company in 1968 to 1973. They built Burns Harbor in Indiana. Bethlehem was the second largest steel company in the world at the time. They almost went bankrupt until the steel company finally started producing higher productivity with the newer equipment. Burns Harbor in Indiana is still going — most efficient steel mill in the United States, because it's the newest one. There have been other steel mills built in other parts of the world, but every one of them, just like the Koreans and the Japanese, were funded by entire countries. It wasn't an individual company. When Intel wants to build a new fab, or Boeing wants to build a new airplane, they have to fund it themselves. But the steel industry — basically it's just a commodity product.
Everybody thought — all the investors thought — this is a dead product. The guy who just stepped down as department head in this department is now Dean at Rice University. He was saying 20 years ago that steel was dead. He was in polymers. He didn't understand the scale of it — steel wasn't dead. It wasn't profitable all through the 1980s, it was losing money. Why? It had a tremendous overcapacity in facilities. They doubled their productivity between the BOF and the continuous caster and a few other things, and the workforce employment was cut down by half because productivity had doubled. To people in Washington, that meant it's a dying industry, it wasn't employing as many people. Well, when you have increases in productivity of that magnitude over that short a period of time, there are tremendous disruptions. But the steel industry was actually doing wonderful things.
§12. Dick Simmons and Allegheny Ludlum [46:23]
There was one guy, a graduate of this department, named Dick Simmons. Anybody here live in Simmons Hall? It's an undergraduate dorm. Dick Simmons graduated from this department in 1952. He went to work for a steel company. Eventually he became president of Allegheny Ludlum Steel, and through two leveraged buyouts in the 1980s he became a half-billionaire. In the 1990s his son-in-law took that half billion dollars and through venture capital made him a billionaire. Dick Simmons is worth a lot of money. He's a very nice person, very humble guy. He dropped in my office once when the department head asked him how the department was doing. He had been here for an MIT Corporation meeting. I said, you need a ride to the airport? He said sure. So I went down, got my car. He very sheepishly said to me, Tom, we're not going to the main terminal — we're going to general aviation. So you've got your own plane, right. He was very embarrassed that he happened to own his own plane. He was a billionaire. But he was very modest in his manner — he said he never expected, his wife never expected, they would be so wealthy.
It turns out Allegheny Ludlum Steel never had an unprofitable quarter in the entire decade of the 1980s when all the rest of the steel companies in the United States were losing money hand over fist. The reason was Dick Simmons understood the technology. I had to deal with an AOD bearing failure at Allegheny Ludlum once, and I had to go to the plant. The hourly workers loved Dick Simmons. They hated most of the rest of management, but they revered Dick Simmons. He was the hourly workers' hero.
§13. Gordon Forward and the Chaparral split-rolling innovation [48:39]
There's another guy, a graduate of this department, who helped with some of these transformations in the steel industry — Gordon Forward. Gordon Forward worked for John Elliott, who had been one of John Chipman's students, and John Chipman was kind of the father of scientific steelmaking in the world. In the 1970s, a few people in the world — Gordon Forward was Canadian — realized the price of scrap steel on the world market was about a hundred dollars a ton. The price of pig iron was about two hundred dollars a ton. So scrap steel was cheaper than iron, and they said there's got to be some money to be made for a hundred dollars a ton.
They invented what's called a mini mill. The mini mill is an electric furnace steel mill. One of these mini mills was Chaparral Steel down in Texas. Gordon Forward became president of Chaparral Steel, very innovative manager. He won a Manager of the Year award from the American Management Association for the way he ran Chaparral. They used to send their mill workers one week a year — they had to go with the salesmen to talk to the customers. They found out that steel reinforcing bar that goes in concrete — the three-eighths inch diameter, the smallest diameter — got a premium price because it was so small. When you're hot rolling the steel, you could only roll it so fast. You're going at 60 miles an hour, and everybody in the world tried to go faster, and they couldn't do it.
The guys at Chaparral find out about this price increase in the market. They go back to the mill, they try to speed up just like everybody else, they fail. Then one of them says, well, instead of going faster, what if we went slower? This is a picture of Chaparral — one bar coming in and two bars coming out of the same mill. They split it in two in the rolling mill. They split the two into four at the next mill stand. So they were going half the speed, only 30 miles an hour, but they were getting four strands out at half the speed, which means double productivity. They took over that business, made lots of money.
There it is — one's on the board and one's here. There's the two strands at the bottom going in and four strands coming out at the top. So sometimes innovation means not trying to do the same thing that everyone else has failed to do and thinking the same way, but trying to do it differently and thinking the opposite. In this case, how to go slower rather than faster allowed you to achieve your real goal: get more product out the door faster, not how fast it traveled in a single strand, but how fast four strands traveled.
§14. Closing: Mittal and the steel comeback [52:24]
Those are some of the stories. Over the last 50 or 60 years, the steel industry in the world has undergone a tremendous transformation. It's not the stodgy industry everyone likes to think. I told you the story about this guy in India who was not stupid — he knew that U.S. Steel and Bethlehem Steel were selling their plants for ten cents on the dollar trying to modernize. He went out and bought the plants at ten cents on the dollar. Burns Harbor in Indiana is now an ArcelorMittal steel mill — Bethlehem went bankrupt. This Indian is a multi-billionaire, because he went out in the 1980s and 1990s when Wall Street said steel's a dog. He knew it wasn't a dog. It might not have been making money, but it had to come back when the overcapacity in production went away.
So tomorrow I'll talk about glass and some of the changes in the glass industry. That's it. Thanks.