WM_Su2014_18

Corrosion Cracking and More Summer 2014 Session · 8 sections 10 cases · Watch on YouTube ↗ all files
Layer 3 — readable edition

§1. Delayed cracking in the Brooklyn-to-Japan box [00:03]

§1.p1

The cracks weren't showing up until they got to Japan. They'd ship them out of Brooklyn, and by the time they got to Japan they had cracks. So they brought these to me — and some of the cracks actually extended over time, or they did for the first few months after they brought it to me. There are cracks in here; you can look on the inside and see them, see light through there. But I noticed that the cracks were on the top, which was another clue. So it was delayed cracking — hydrogen cracking is called delayed cracking. I noticed they were at the top, and I know that when you take a flat plate of this type of steel and form it, you get the maximum deformation as you roll it up like this, up here.

§1.p2

[Tom produces a neodymium iron boron magnet.] Very magnetic up here, hardly magnetic down here at all. In fact, the bottom is aluminum — I talk about the aluminum bottom in the adhesive bonding lectures. You can go up the side and feel the increase in magnetism, because that steel, as it deforms, it turns magnetic. It's actually called a transformation induced plasticity steel, a TRIP steel. Not stainless steels, but they've developed lower alloy steels that can give them like 150 ksi for sheet steel for automobiles. We've known about TRIP steels for eighty years, but they're now starting to use them for very high strength steel in automobiles, where when you deform it, it transforms to martensite and becomes very hard. Usually with martensite you have to quench it.

§2. Distortion and residual stress in welding [01:52]

§2.p1

Any other questions? Okay, I talked about distortion and there were a couple of things I wanted to show you. This is 5083 aluminum, electron beam welded, from a quarter inch — 6.4 millimeters — to 38 millimeters, which is about an inch and a half thick. If you look, this is nice and straight and flat, so are these. As you get up to about 3/8 — and I told you 3/8 is where you get the maximum distortion — you don't get distortion here because it's not a v-shaped weld. Once we start getting into the more v-shaped welds, and these up here are probably multi-pass welds, you get more and more distortion.

§2.p2

Now if the whole thing is restrained you don't get distortion, you just get huge residual stresses — tensile residual stresses right there, compressive residual stresses on the bottom. That was what General Electric was finding with their stainless steel welds in the reactor safe ends. These are two or two and a half foot diameter pipes where you'd flood the reactor with borated water if you had a problem. You quench the reactor by flooding it with borated water. The problem is, those pipes were one and a half to two inches thick, and they had tremendous tensile residual stresses on the inside. One of the things they did is they developed welding procedures that created compressive residual stresses on the inside, where it was in contact with the water.

§2.p3

If you remember, we've got three things — material, stress, and environment — that can lead to stress corrosion cracking. I've told you many times: seventy percent of the time, metallurgists just lump hydrogen embrittlement and stress corrosion cracking together. But they are different. I'll now tell you the secret of the difference. The secret is, one occurs at the anode and the other one occurs at the cathode. Stress corrosion cracking occurs at the anode, hydrogen embrittlement occurs at the cathode. Why? Because the corrosive species in corrosion are usually negative ions, and so they go to the anode, which is positive. And if you try to remember all this — just like high school chemistry, you can't keep reduction at the cathode straight — but nonetheless, with hydrogen embrittlement you've got a positive hydrogen ion that wants to go to the negative electrode, the cathode. So hydrogen cracking occurs at the cathode, stress corrosion cracking occurs at the anode. If you're not worried about which one's positive and which one's negative, sometimes metallurgists just lump them all together and call it stress corrosion cracking — because the susceptible microstructure (of which martensite is the worst because it's the hardest), the presence of stress (the higher the stress the easier it is to crack), and the environment (either a negative ion or a positive hydrogen) — that's what makes the difference.

§2.p4

So we have problems with distortion. You can lower the distortion — the amount of distortion varies with the amount of heat to the work piece. This is out of Sindo Kou's book on welding metallurgy, where he shows heat input to the work piece versus power density of the heat source, for gas welding, arc welding, and high-energy electron beam welding. The real difference is you get a very v-shaped weld in gas welding, less v-shaped in arc welding, and in high-energy electron beam you can get very parallel sides. So there's no preferential distortion — no greater shrinkage at the top of the v than the bottom of the v.

§2.p5

If you look at density of the heat source versus distortion, you'll find that it varies in that manner. Here's something else out of this book, looking at gas tungsten arc welding, which makes a very v-shaped weld, versus electron beam welding. The distortion angle alpha goes from near zero to very high values depending on the thickness of the material. This plot shows the heat intensity, power density in watts per square centimeter, as a function of productivity. When you go through the fusion welding lectures you'll get this in some detail — I wrote it, twenty-five years ago. Okay, so that's some more on distortion.

§3. Preheat: low, medium, and high regimes [07:27]

§3.p1

Now I want to go to preheat. We have preheat and post heat for welding, and we use them in lots of different materials, not just steel. In steel there are three levels of preheat that I talk about — I'm not sure I've ever read anyone else talking about it. If I'm preheating from 50 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit: the structural welding code says you shall not weld unless you're above 10 degrees Fahrenheit, which is sort of ridiculous because you could have frost on it. But the structural welding code is usually for lower strength steels, and the preheat requirement is not as great. I told you it's almost impossible to take an A36 steel — which is what your bridges and your buildings usually are, about 36 ksi yield — and crack it. Sometimes they use something that's 50 ksi, which is similar to the EH-32 that Tom talked about welding in the rudder stool.

§3.p2

There's DH-32, and the 32, I think, is 32 kilograms per square millimeter, which works out to 48 or 52 ksi as I remember. A36 is 36 ksi — thirty-six thousand pounds per square inch. EH32 and DH32 are 36 kilograms per square millimeter. It's been literally thirty-five years since I've worked on EH and DH steels. They are a marine type of steel; basically what the structural welding code would call a 50 ksi steel. The steel companies don't necessarily make a different steel for every designation.

§3.p3

You have different standards. You have the American Iron and Steel Institute, which is the four-digit — like 1021 steel, 4340, 4130, 8630. Then you have the ASTM specifications, which are also used by the ASME boiler and pressure vessel code. They're like A36, ASTM A36. I showed you out of Stout and Doty's book A27, which is a cast steel — that's an ASTM steel. The boiler and pressure vessel code calls it an SA27. Then the Navy has their steels, the HY steels; the Germans have their steels. A lot of these things have overlapping ranges. So if I buy an ASTM A106 pipe, it might meet a 1020 AISI designation, it might meet an ASME B31.3. It might meet five or six standards, and you can put on your purchase order which ones are going to hold. In more recent years people just put all of them on, and sometimes they conflict, because not every standard is exactly the same. That's another problem.

§3.p4

For preheat: if you have a simple low-carbon steel that doesn't harden very much, all you really need to do is get the moisture off. The ASME code says you shall not weld steels with less than 50 degree preheat, because even though you don't have frost above 32 degrees Fahrenheit, you have considerable absorbed water on the surface. Where do you think the frost on your windshield comes from? When it gets below 32, there was actually a little layer of dew on there, right? Below 50 degrees you actually have enough humidity in the air that every surface starts to absorb some moisture, and you shouldn't weld on a surface unless you bring it up to 50 degrees. In the 50 to 100 degree range — let's face it, when you preheat you're going to overshoot 50 degrees, and as you start welding it will start to cool down because you're no longer heating it. In that range you're not doing anything except driving off moisture.

§3.p5

Moisture, of course, is a source of hydrogen. You can tolerate 10 or 20 parts per million hydrogen in these types of steels that have very low preheat. When you go to medium preheat, which I call 100 to 300 degrees Fahrenheit, now you may have a thicker steel, or a higher carbon steel, or a little bit of alloy content — it might be an HSLA steel that's two inches thick. If it was HY80 and it's two or four inches thick you might need three or four hundred degree preheat. If it's HSLA you may only need a hundred to three hundred, or a hundred to two hundred degrees. That's why the Navy wanted to go to HSLA plate steels, and that's one of the reasons they sent me over to Japan in the mid 80s to see how the Japanese were making these steels. The Japanese were making commercial steels for shipbuilding at the time that required no preheat. They might have one-inch-thick plate that in the old days, with an alloy steel, you had to preheat to 200 degrees — now they didn't have to preheat it at all, at least during the summer in Japan. Maybe in the winter they had to get it up there, but they didn't have to preheat it. Saved them millions of dollars in shipbuilding.

§3.p6

What happens in this medium range: ordinarily if you heat something up, the temperature-time plot when you strike an arc will rise up rapidly because the arc is pretty hot, get up to the melting temperature, and then when you take the arc away it starts to cool down. If it cools down below 100 or 200 degrees, you run into a problem. This is where hydrogen cracking occurs. Remember I showed you hydrogen cracking is worst at room temperature, and if you're at two or three hundred degrees the hydrogen can diffuse out. Remember I poured the Sprite in — the Sprite goes flat. If you preheat, you're going to level off at a couple hundred degrees, and the hydrogen has time to escape, because this big heavy piece of steel is not going to cool off in less than an hour. So you're actually doing a one-hour post heat by preheating.

§4. The Idaho Falls preheat story [14:48]

§4.p1

One of my favorite stories: I was talking to a friend who was a welding engineer at Idaho National Engineering Lab out in Idaho Falls. He had gone through a shop where they were building some nuclear reactor components out of carbon steel. It was a Monday morning. I don't know if it was a pressure vessel or whatever, but he went up, and he knew the thing was supposed to be preheated to about 150 degrees, because he was a welding engineer. He didn't feel warm — if you stand next to something that weighs a few tons and it's 150 degrees, you can tell. He put his hand up to it, and he actually touched it. You can't — if you put your hand on 150 degrees you won't leave it there very long, you won't burn it immediately but you won't leave it there. And he realized it wasn't preheated. He went over and asked the welder, well, did you preheat this? He says, oh, we did that on Friday. Okay. It cooled down over the weekend, so there was no effect of preheat.

§4.p2

Preheat does nothing metallurgically — it just slows the cooling rate so you can get rid of the hydrogen. In the intermediate range, you're slowing the cooling to evolve the hydrogen, get rid of the hydrogen. High preheat, on the other hand, when you're getting above 300 degrees Fahrenheit — which you might have to do on a thick section of HY100 in a four-inch-thick highly restrained joint — when you're doing this you're actually tempering the steel. You're getting a microstructural change. It's cooling down just like this, but it's cooling down above 300 degrees, and above 300 degrees you're going to temper the steel. Remember I told you, you can take a medium carbon steel that has a high carbon equivalent — we haven't talked about carbon equivalent yet — something like this nail file: you can quench it, it'll be fairly brittle and very hard, and then you temper it, you bring it up to 300 to 1000 degrees, typically 300 to 1100 degrees Fahrenheit for a little bit of time, and you soften it.

§4.p3

If you go to a preheat above 300, you're going to temper and soften, hopefully to less than Rockwell C30, which is a hardness level. At Rockwell C30 — about the minimum strength of something like an HY130 — you usually don't get cracking unless you're very highly restrained. So at higher preheats, greater than 300, you're tempering. At 300 or 400 degrees you're tempering; at 500 you're tempering; at 600 you're tempering. We tend to avoid for metallurgical reasons 600 to a thousand, because you get something called temper embrittlement, which is another problem in carbon steels — not so much in alloy steels, but we try to avoid that. HY80 and HY100 have a lot of alloy addition, because they temper them above a thousand degrees. They don't want to temper them in the 800 degree range in the steel mill, to lower the hardness. You could use less alloying element, save hundreds of dollars a ton, but you're not going to get the same toughness. It's not that the toughness falls off a cliff, it's just not as good, and we always want the best.

§5. Extreme preheats: cast iron, turbine blades, Sea Wolf [18:41]

§5.p1

There are different levels of preheat. When you go to some very difficult-to-weld materials, like cast iron, you may have to preheat to 600 degrees Fahrenheit. Who wants to weld on something at 600 degrees Fahrenheit? If you brush up against that — you actually could probably start your cotton clothing on fire if you brushed up against it at 600 degrees. You're getting to the ignition point of a number of organic fibers and stuff. At 600 degrees, any piece of plastic — if you had a polyester shirt, it's not toast, it's melted, and it's liable to start burning. You're getting close to the ignition temperature.

§5.p2

Some materials are very susceptible to residual stresses and cracking, such as some nickel-based alloys. If I had a turbine blade — I've been to shops where they take turbine blades and they preheat them to a thousand degrees centigrade, which is almost 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, in order to be able to weld them, because just the residual stresses from cooling and shrinkage will crack that turbine blade alloy. It doesn't have very good ductility to begin with, and it has excellent high-temperature strength — that's why you're using it in the turbine. So it won't deform in the turbine, and with that high strength at high temperatures it just cracks. They actually put an induction heater on it; the thing is glowing red when you do the electron beam weld to repair it, and they do it in a vacuum. It's kind of pricey, but that little blade might be worth seven thousand dollars repaired, and it's worth — actually it's worth about fifty dollars scrap metal — but it's worth seven thousand if you can repair it. So it's worth doing some pretty unusual preheats in some alloys, but not steels.

§5.p3

The highest temperature I've ever seen in steel preheat is about 600, and that's for a very thick highly restrained steel. Most steels are not above about 400. But even though I told you about the Sea Wolf and the blue jelly suits, when they redid the Sea Wolf they didn't want to have it crack a second time, so that's why they went to the blue jelly suits. They actually, I think, shut down production at Electric Boat for about a year. Even that cost a few dollars, because you might be able to lay off the hourly workers but you can't lay off the salaried workers — they still got to come and eat their lunch in the cafeteria. Actually they had a lot to do trying to figure out how to solve the problem.

§6. The HY80 weld sample and welding codes [21:22]

§6.p1

Any questions on preheat? We're going to go through preheating now, because I just handed around part of the structural welding code, and we're talking about welding something like this. [Tom holds up a welded HY80 sample.] I got this from Electric Boat about thirty or thirty-five years ago. This is an actual weld in one-inch-thick HY80 made by Electric Boat. It has a backing bar because they welded from one side. If you measure it very carefully you actually see some distortion here — if I drew a straight line here it wouldn't be straight. The thing is V-shaped, because it's a V-shape weld. You can also see the size of the heat affected zone: this is weld metal in the slightly lighter gray, the darker blacker region is the heat affected zone of the weld. You've got a heat affected zone down here. This piece is probably not HY80 — HY80 is expensive steel; if you're just using a backing bar and you're going to cut it off later, use a piece of cheap old carbon steel. And this is not rusted — anybody want to know why it didn't rust? Because it's black iron. It's actually got a layer of other stuff on it, but the surface — we sprayed it with a clear coat, clear lacquer, so it wouldn't rust.

§6.p2

Let me also hand around — there are lots of books, this is a single-page sheet of carbon equivalents, and I'm going to talk about carbon equivalents. There are lots of books from the 1930s, and 1940s was the first edition of Stout and Doty I think, on how to weld steels without hydrogen cracking. In the mid 60s Frank Coe came out with his book from the British Welding Institute, sort of based on the research they did because of the Liberty ships at the British Welding Institute. There are a number of things, but finally, starting about ten or fifteen years ago, the American Welding Society, which publishes the structural welding code — that's been around since about 1920.

§6.p3

The two most widely used welding codes in the world are the ASME code, which some people call the granddaddy code — it had its 100th anniversary about five or six years ago. It was kind of the first welding code. Arc welding didn't start until the 1880s — actually it was invented in 1806 or so by Sir Humphry Davy, who was using Volta's piles, as they called them, but they were batteries. They were a research thing. Alessandro Volta had developed this electrochemical cell which he called a pile, P-I-L-E, because it was a pile of plates. Sir Humphry Davy had this and he was studying arcs. In fact, he called it an arc because he had two electrodes which he placed together and he pulled them apart, and it formed an arch. That's where the word welding arc comes from.

§6.p4

He found this was a pretty interesting heat source — it would melt the tips of the steels with the materials he had. One of the first things — you'll get this in my fusion welding lecture — one of the first things anyone does with a new heat source is they try to weld with it, whether it's a laser, whatever. The Navy developed particle beam weapons in the mid 80s to try to shoot down incoming missiles, and they couldn't do anything with it. In the early 90s they had a workshop at White Oak to figure out — with peace breaking out with the former Soviet Union — we spent a quarter billion dollars developing these high-energy electron beams that would go through the air, and they're supposed to shoot down an incoming missile. And we don't need it anymore. What are we going to do with this quarter-billion-dollar technology? They asked me to come down and talk about whether they could weld submarines. And I said, well, maybe you could melt a submarine, but you can't weld with that much energy. You only need about 10 to 50 kilowatts to make a weld in that piece of HY80 that's going around, and they had megawatts.

§6.p5

The only problem with that high-energy electron beam: it worked great in a vacuum, but unfortunately the ocean is not in a vacuum, it's got air above it. They ran into something called a hose instability. You could shoot what should have been a straight beam coming out, but then the atmosphere would cause those electrons to whip around like the end of a garden hose that wasn't restrained that had water flow. That's why the physicists called it a hose instability. You actually could shoot down missiles from 30 miles away, but you had to have a very cooperative missile that would run into your beam — you couldn't aim it. They could shoot down something 30 inches away, but they determined that wasn't far enough away to protect the ship. Anyway, it's only a quarter billion dollars. It was a DARPA project, don't blame just the Navy, but it was managed by the Navy.

§7. The structural welding code and Annex I [26:36]

§7.p1

Anyway, the second most widely used, and actually probably the most widely used today, is the structural welding code. In the United States and many parts of the world you can't build a bridge or a building without using the structural welding code. It's not as rigorous as the ASME boiler and pressure vessel code. The consequence of a boiler and pressure vessel code failure is you basically wipe out a whole city block or more. The consequence of a bridge or a building falling down is a few people get killed, a few cars get destroyed, but it's not as serious. So the requirements are not quite as strict.

§7.p2

I should have brought you an earlier one. This is the 2010; I think they should be coming out with a new one. When I started buying these thirty-five years ago, they were one-third the thickness or one-quarter of the thickness, and they cost about 80 bucks. Now they cost about 400, because all of the code-writing authorities learned in the 1990s they could make a small fortune by charging a lot of money for the codes, because you can't fabricate unless you follow the code, which means your engineers all have to have copies. How many copies of this code do you need? You can have it in digital form, but you still have to pay for that digital copy. So the American Welding Society used to limp along on a couple of million dollars a year; now it makes 10 or 15 million dollars a year, not just by selling codes but by certifying welders, which we're going to talk about in a little bit. It's become big business. They used to have like one or two million dollars in savings, and I just looked at the balance sheet in the Welding Journal last week, and they have 90 million dollars in the bank.

§7.p3

So it's been a big business for societies. For a while there they decided this was such a great deal — the boiler and pressure vessel code comes out every three years, and it would cost you sixteen thousand dollars to buy the whole boiler and pressure vessel code every three years. Now they give you semi-annual updates which come free with a sixteen-thousand-dollar subscription. This only costs four hundred, but they decided a few years ago to bring out a new edition every year, so they could get four hundred dollars from everybody every year. They got so many squawks that it comes out every three years again.

§7.p4

The structural welding code has included in it for the last ten or twelve years an Annex I, which is a guideline on alternative methods for determining preheat. Preheat is a complex subject, but this is the best by far explanation, and you now have a copy of this. There are two basic methods of determining preheat: hardness control and hydrogen control. You now know what those mean. Hardness — you don't want it to get too hard because the harder it is, the bigger that stress circle in that Venn diagram becomes. And hydrogen control — you don't want it to get too big because the bigger that environmental circle gets.

§7.p5

So if I've got this Venn diagram — maybe I'll draw my Venn diagram. I can either control hardness: if I have a material, and I have a certain amount of hydrogen, which we call the environment, and I can control my hardness, which is my stress, I can get zero overlap, no hydrogen cracking, right? No intersection there. Or I can have my circle of material, I can have a lot of stress, and I can control my hydrogen, and I have no overlap. So those are the two methods. You could control the material, but usually some design engineer has told you, you shall make it out of HY100, or you shall make it out of whatever. You could control the material, but that's a whole new design.

§8. Carbon equivalents and zone classification [31:15]

§8.p1

So if you look and think about it, what else do you have other than those two circles to control? There's the hardness control in the heat affected zone, because that's where the cracks usually occur — except in the Sea Wolf, where it occurred in the weld metal, which was a big surprise, because it had always occurred in heat affected zone before. They didn't have such overmatching weld metal strength.

§8.p2

So here's the selection of the method, and the first thing you do is you calculate a carbon equivalent. I did mention carbon equivalent before — I think I talked about hardness and hardenability, but I didn't do it in terms of carbon equivalent. The carbon controls the hardness of a steel, whereas the alloying elements control the depth to which hardening occurs. If I have a carbon steel — I told you a carbon steel, it's hard to quench it fast enough to get something much more than a sixteenth of an inch — and that HY80 that I sent around had a heat affected zone that's more like a quarter of an inch. I couldn't even get high hardness over that full heat affected zone in a carbon steel, but in an alloy steel I can. If you remember, I talked about hardness versus hardenability: one was a function of the carbon content, the other one is a function of the thickness and a function of the alloy content.

§8.p3

The carbon equivalent is basically a measure of how deep I can harden that heat affected zone in that steel with a certain alloy content. The carbon equivalent starts with the carbon. Manganese and silicon don't add as much hardenability as carbon does — you divide by six. Chrome, moly, and vanadium you divide by five. Nickel and copper you divide by 15. This is one of the formulas. There are many formulas. Out of Easterling's book, in an appendix he lists a lot, and I handed this out. You don't have to be able to read all this from the board, so don't worry about it too much.

§8.p4

Here's that same carbon equivalent formula, and here are other carbon equivalent formulas that lots of people have developed over the years. I know you can't read it from the screen, but I handed it out, because it is so busy. You're going to see that here in the AWS Annex I, they use not just this one but another one. So you go through and you look from the carbon equivalent, and it says figure out whether you are in Zones 1, 2, or 3. Let me tell you, the first time I ever read this it took me about three hours over two days to figure out what this thing was telling me. When I finally understood it I thought, oh, this is pretty good — but it took me three hours to figure out, and I knew something about some of this stuff.

§8.p5

You have to go to this plot, which tells you what Zones 1, 2, and 3 are. So here's Zones 1, 2, and 3. Zone classification of steels: carbon content versus carbon equivalent. So I'm plotting carbon content versus hardness, or hardness versus hardenability if you will. Down here in the low-hardness zone, less than 10 points of carbon, I can't get high hardness no matter what. So if I want to control hardness, Zone 1, those steels are easy to weld no matter what their carbon equivalent or the depth of hardenability, because a tenth of a percent carbon won't give me more than about Rockwell C30.

§8.p6

Zone 2: I have higher carbon and so I can get higher hardness, but if my carbon equivalent — the depth of hardening — is not above about 0.5, I'm in pretty good shape. The good thing about HY80 is it's right about in here, it's in Zone 2. You have to use some preheat. Down here in Zone 1 you're going to find you don't need preheat at all in most cases. HY80 is right in here; HY100, higher strength, same carbon, is getting right up against this line. Zone 3 — high depth of hardening, high potential hardness — these are the ones that are going to take a lot of preheat. So the first thing you do in hardness control is just determine whether you're in Zones 1, 2, or 3. If you're lucky and you're welding bridge steels and stuff like that, or HSLA steels, you're going to find you're in Zone 1, and you don't have to do much more than come up to 50 to 100 degrees to get the moisture off.

§8.p7

Now in the hardness method, going through here, you use the carbon equivalent and you look at another plot and determine whether you have a maximum HAZ hardness of 400 or 350 Vickers from Figure 1.2. Well, it turns out 400 —

Cases referenced

  • Brooklyn-to-Japan stainless steel box delayed cracking §1.p1

    Tom's opening case (recording starts mid-narrative). Used to illustrate delayed hydrogen cracking and TRIP steel transformation: the cracks appeared on the top of the formed box where deformation-induced martensite raised hardness. Magnet test confirmed the transformation gradient.

  • GE boiling water reactor safe-end residual stress §2.p2

    Used to illustrate that restraint converts distortion into residual stress. The GE safe-end welds carried tensile residual stresses on the inside surface (where borated quench water contacted them); the fix was developing procedures that produced compressive residual stresses on the inside.

  • Japanese HSLA shipbuilding steel — no-preheat capability §3.p5

    Cited as the motivation for Tom's mid-1980s Japan trip on behalf of the Navy. Japanese commercial steel mills were producing one-inch plate that required no summer preheat — a millions-of-dollars savings vs. the alloy steels needing 200°F preheat. Sets up the Navy's interest in HSLA for surface ships.

  • Idaho National Engineering Lab preheat-skipped-over-weekend story §4.p1

    Teaching anecdote from a welding-engineer friend. The Monday-morning piece was supposed to be preheated to 150°F; touch-test revealed it had been preheated Friday and allowed to cool over the weekend. Used as the punchline illustrating that preheat must be present at the moment of welding, not just nominally performed.

  • Turbine blade electron-beam repair at induction-heated red heat §5.p2

    Used to illustrate the upper extreme of preheat (1000°C, ~2000°F) for nickel-base turbine blade alloys. The blade is glowing red inside the vacuum chamber while the EB weld is made; economics ($50 scrap vs. $7000 repaired) justify the unusual practice.

  • Sea Wolf submarine HY-100 weld metal cracking and blue jelly suits §5.p3

    Cited to make two points: (1) the redone Sea Wolf used high preheat plus the "blue jelly suits" humidity control to prevent recurrence; (2) the Sea Wolf cracking was unusual in that it occurred in the weld metal rather than the heat-affected zone, because of overmatching weld metal strength. Tom notes Electric Boat shut down production for about a year and salaried workers still had to be paid.

  • Electric Boat HY-80 one-inch weld sample §6.p1

    Physical-object teaching move. Tom acquired this single-side weld with backing bar from Electric Boat ~30–35 years before the lecture; uses it to show distortion (V-shape pulls top edges in), the HAZ size relative to a quarter-inch in carbon steel, and the rationale for clear-coating black iron samples.

  • Navy particle beam weapons program — submarine welding feasibility §6.p4

    Cited in the arc-welding origin-of-heat-sources thread. After peace broke out with the Soviet Union, the Navy convened a workshop at White Oak asking whether the $250M particle-beam technology could weld submarines. Tom's answer: at megawatts you could melt a submarine, not weld it (10–50 kW suffices for HY-80). Includes the "hose instability" anecdote — beam wandered in atmosphere, could shoot down a 30-inch-away missile or a cooperative 30-mile-away missile but couldn't aim.

  • Sir Humphry Davy and the welding arc (1806) §6.p3

    Etymology of "welding arc" — Davy pulled apart electrodes powered by Volta's pile and observed the luminous arch.

  • Liberty ships and the British Welding Institute §6.p2

    Brief reference to Frank Coe's mid-1960s book emerging from BWI research on the Liberty ship failures.

Layer 2 — cleanup edit
p1 00:03

Told me the cracks weren't showing up until they showed up in Japan, so they'd ship them out of Brooklyn and by the time they got to Japan they had cracks. So they brought these — actually some of the cracks have extended over time, or they did for the first few months after they brought it to me. But there's cracks in here, you can look on the inside and you can see them, see light through there okay. But I noticed that the cracks were on the top, which was another clue. So it was delayed cracking. I mean, hydrogen cracking is called delayed cracking. I noticed there at the top, and I know that when you take a flat plate of this type of steel and form it, you get the maximum deformation as you roll it up like this, up here.

p2 00:46

And I went, got my little magnet — this is the one I was using at the time, it's a neodymium iron boron magnet okay. Very magnetic up here, hardly magnetic down here at all. In fact, actually it's aluminum bottom — I talk about the aluminum bottom and adhesive bonding lectures, but anyway. So, and you can go up the side and you can feel the increase in magnetism as you go up, because that steel as it deforms it turns magnetic. It's actually called a transformation induced plasticity steel, a TRIP steel. Not stainless steels, but they've developed lower alloy steels that can give them like 150 ksi for sheet steel for automobiles. Now actually we've known about TRIP steels for eighty years, but they now are using them, uh, starting to use them for very high strength steel in automobiles now, where when you deform it transforms to martensite and becomes very hard. Usually with martensite you have to quench it.

p3 01:52

Okay, any other questions? Okay, um, so this is — I talked about distortion and there were a couple of things I wanted to show you. This is actually for 5083 aluminum, electron beam welded, from a quarter inch, 6.4 millimeter, to 38 millimeters which is about an inch and a half thick. And if you look, this is nice and straight and flat, so are these. As you get up to about — this is probably 3/8, and I told you 3/8 is where you could get the maximum distortion — you don't get distortion here because it's not a v-shaped weld. Once we start getting into the more v-shaped welds, and these are actually probably multi-pass welds up here, you get more and more distortion okay.

p4 02:39

Now if the whole thing is restrained you don't get distortion, you just get huge residual stresses, and you'd have tensile residual stresses right there, you'd have compressive residual stresses on the bottom okay. And that was what, so far as that goes, the General Electric was finding with their stainless — they had stainless steel welds in the safe reactor safe ends. So these are like two or two and a half foot diameter pipes where you'd flood the reactor with borated water if you had a problem. You quench the reactor by flooding it with borated water. And the problem is, those pipes were one and a half to two inches thick, and they had tremendous tensile residual stresses, and they were on the inside. One of the things they did is they developed welding procedures in the future that created compressive residual stresses on the inside, where it was in contact with the water.

p5 03:37

If you remember, we've got three things: material, stress, and environment, that can lead to stress corrosion cracking. I told you the stress corrosion cracking many times — people, well I'll say seventy percent of the time, metallurgists just kind of lump hydrogen embrittlement and stress corrosion cracking together. But they are different. I will now tell you the secret of the difference, and the secret is one occurs at the anode and the other one occurs at the cathode. Stress corrosion cracking occurs at the anode, hydrogen embrittlement occurs at the cathode. Why? Because the corrosive species in corrosion are usually negative ions, and so they go to the anode which is positive. And if you try to remember all this — just like high school chemistry, you can't keep reduction and you know, reduction at the cathode you know, straight — but nonetheless, hydrogen embrittlement, you've got a positive hydrogen ion that wants to go to the negative electrode, which is the cathode. So hydrogen cracking occurs at the cathode, stress corrosion cracking occurs at the anode. If you're not worried about which one's positive and which one's negative, you just call them — sometimes metallurgists just lump them all together and call it stress corrosion cracking — because the susceptible microstructure, of which martensite is the worst because it's the hardest, presence of stress, it doesn't really, you know, the higher the stress the easier it is to crack, and the environment is either a negative ion or a positive hydrogen, and that's what makes the difference okay so far as that goes.

p6 05:12

I bought myself a new red one. This doesn't work any better okay. Um, I have a new blue one on order. I also bought a new — well, this is the cheapest one of all, costs less than ten bucks. Also it's also a LED light, not neat. Anyway. So we have problems with distortion. You can lower the distortion, or the amount of distortion varies with the amount of heat to the work piece, and this is out of Cinder Co's [Kou's] book on welding metallurgy, where he basically shows — well, heat input to the work piece versus power density of the heat source, for gas welding, arc welding, and high energy electron beam welding. And the real difference here is you get a very v-shaped weld here, less v-shaped in arc welding, and high-energy electron beam you can get very parallel sides, and so there's no preferential distortion, greater shrinkage at the top of the v than the bottom of the v.

p7 06:21

So if you want to look at density of the heat source versus distortion, you'll find that it varies in that manner. And here's something else out of this book, which is looking at gas tungsten arc welding, which is an arc welding process, makes a very v-shaped weld, versus electron beam welding. The distortion angle alpha goes from near zero to very high values depending on the thickness of the material. This is a plot that shows the heat intensity, power density in watts per square centimeter as a function of productivity. When you go through the fusion welding lectures you'll get this in some detail because I wrote it, anyway, um, it's something I did, uh, twenty-five years ago. Okay, so that's some more on distortion.

p8 07:27

Now I want to go to — oh, I want to go to preheat first. In the meantime we can start handing these out. Okay so we have preheat and post heat for welding, and we use them in lots of different materials, not just steel. So we might, but in steel there are kind of three levels of preheat that I talked about, I'm not sure I've ever read anyone else talking about it. But if I'm preheating from 50 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit, uh, the structural welding code says you shall not weld unless you're above 10 degrees Fahrenheit, which is sort of ridiculous because you could have frost on it okay. But the structural welding code we're usually welding lower strength steels okay, and the preheat requirement is not as great. I told you it's almost impossible to take an A36 steel, which is what your bridges and your buildings usually are — sort of 36 ksi yield — sometimes they use something that's 50 ksi which is similar to the EH-32 that Tom talked about welding in the — would you call it the rudder deck, or whatever you called it — the rudder stool okay.

p9 08:51

And there's DH-32, and the 32 I think is 32 kilograms per square millimeter which is actually 50 ksi okay, as I remember. Okay it's been a long time since I, uh, which weird — 36 ksi, but then DH36 and EH36, or I think 48, 56 or something, right? Left? Yes. Because 30, A36 is 36 ksi, thirty-six thousand pounds per square inch. EH32 and DH32 are, as I remember, 36 kilograms per square millimeter, which works out to 48 or 52 ksi as I remember. But it's been literally thirty-five years since I've worked on EH and DH steels. They are sort of a marine type of steel, it's basically what the structural welding code would call a 50 ksi steel. I mean it's the same thing, the steel companies don't necessarily make a different steel for every designation.

p10 09:56

You have different standards, you have the American Iron and Steel Institute, which is the four digit, you know, like the 1021 steel, or the 4340, or the 4130, or the 8630. Then you have the ASTM specifications, which are also used by the ASME boiler and pressure vessel code. They're like A36, ASTM A36, or I showed you out of one of the books, um, Stout and Doty's book, A27, which is a cast steel — that's an ASTM steel. Well, after a boiler and pressure vessel they make an SA, or an SA27. But then the Navy has their steels, the HY steels, the Germans have their steels. And what happens is, a steel company — a lot of these things have the same overlapping ranges. So if I buy an A106 pipe, ASTM A106 pipe, it might meet a 1020 AISI designation, it might meet an ASME B31.3 — actually that's actually, well, it might also meet that. Anyway, it might meet five or six standards. And you can put it on your — depends on what you put on your purchase order which ones are going to hold. In more recent years people just put all of them on, okay, and sometimes they conflict okay, because not every standard is exactly the same. That's another problem.

p11 11:30

Anyway, but for preheat, if you have a simple low-carbon steel, doesn't harden very much, all you really need to do is get the moisture off. And the ASME code says you shall not weld steels with less than 50 degree preheat, because even though you don't have frost above 32 degrees Fahrenheit, you have considerable amount of absorbed water on the surface okay. I mean where do you think the frost on your windshield comes from? When it gets below 32, there was actually a little layer of dew on there right? So below 50 degrees you actually have enough humidity in the air, these surfaces, every surface starts to absorb some moisture, and you shouldn't weld on a surface unless you bring it up to 50 degrees. In 50 to 100 degrees, because let's face it, when you preheat you're going to overshoot the 50 degrees, and as you start welding it will start to cool down because you're no longer heating it most likely. And so it's kind of in that range you're not doing anything except driving off moisture okay.

p12 12:42

And moisture of course is a source of hydrogen. But you can tolerate 10 or 20 parts per million hydrogen in these types of steels that have very low preheat. When you go to medium preheat, and I call it 100 to 300 degrees Fahrenheit, now you may have a thicker steel, or you may have a higher carbon steel, or you might have a little bit alloy content, it might be an HSLA steel that's two inches thick. If it was HY80 and it's two inches thick or four inches thick you might need three or four hundred degree preheat. If it's an HSLA you may only need a hundred to three hundred, or hundred to two hundred degrees preheat. That's why the Navy wanted to go to HSLA plate steels, and that's one of the reasons they sent me over to Japan in the mid 80s to see how the Japanese were making these steels. The Japanese were making commercial steels for shipbuilding at the time that required no preheat, so they might have one inch thick plate that in the old days with an alloy steel you had to preheat to 200 degrees, now they didn't have to preheat it at all, at least during the summer in Japan. Maybe in the winter they had to get it up here, but they didn't have to preheat it. Saved them millions of dollars in shipbuilding.

p13 13:51

What happens in this medium range, ordinarily if you heat something up, the temperature time plot when you strike an arc or whatever, will you get up here to the melting temperature and then it will cool — it'll rise up rapidly because the arc is pretty hot, you take the arc away and it starts to cool down. If it cools down below 100 or 200 degrees, you run into a problem. This is where hydrogen cracking occurs. Remember I showed you hydrogen cracking is worst at room temperature, and if you're at two or three hundred degrees the hydrogen can diffuse out. Remember I poured the Sprite in the, you know, okay, get the Sprite is flat. Well, if you preheat, you now are going to level off at a couple hundred degrees, and so the hydrogen has time, because this big heavy piece of steel is not going to cool off in less than an hour. So you're actually doing a one hour post heat by preheating okay.

p14 14:48

Now one of my favorite stories — I was talking to a friend who was a welding engineer at Idaho National Engineering Lab out in Idaho Falls, and he was talking about, he had gone through a shop where they were building some nuclear reactor components out of carbon steel, and uh, it was a Monday morning, and this is — I don't know if it was a pressure vessel or whatever — but he went up, and he knew the thing was supposed to be preheated to about 150 degrees because he was a welding engineer. And he went up and he didn't feel warm. I mean if you stand next to something that weighs a few tons and it's 150 degrees you sort of can tell okay. And he put his hand up to it, and he actually touched it, and you can't — if you put your hand on 150 degrees you won't leave it there very long, you won't burn it immediately but you won't leave it there. And he realized it wasn't preheated, and he went over and asked the welder who was welding and says, well did you preheat this? He says oh, we did that on Friday. Oh. Okay. And it cooled down over the weekend so there was no effect of preheat.

p15 15:50

Does nothing metallurgically, it just slows the cooling rate so you can get rid of the hydrogen. So basically here, intermediate, you're slowing the cooling to destroy or evolve the hydrogen, get rid of the hydrogen. High preheat on the other hand, when you're getting above 300 degrees Fahrenheit, which you might have to do on a thick section of, well, an HY100 or something, in a four inch thick highly restrained joint — we'll see that in a little bit. When you're doing this you're actually tempering the steel, you're getting a microstructural change. Yeah, it's cooling down just like this, but it's cooling down above 300 degrees, and above 300 degrees you're going to temper the steel. Remember I told you, can take a medium carbon steel, has a high carbon equivalent — we haven't talked about carbon equivalent yet, but anyway — you can take a something like this nail file, you can quench it, it'll be fairly brittle and very hard, and then you temper it, you bring it up to 300 to 1000 degrees, typically 300 to 1100 degrees Fahrenheit for a little bit of time and you soften it.

p16 17:09

Well basically what you're doing, if you go to a preheat above 300, you're going to temper and soften to hopefully less than Rockwell C 30, which is a hardness level. So you're going to soften to a lower hardness, and at Rockwell C30, which is about the strength — the minimum strength of something like an HY130 — you usually don't get cracking unless you're very highly restrained okay. So higher preheats, now we go to — when I say higher preheats, the greater 300, you are tempering at 300 or 400 degrees, you're tempering at 500, you're tempering at 600. We tend to avoid for metallurgical reasons 600 to a thousand, because you get something called temper embrittlement, which is another problem in the steel, in carbon steels — not so much in alloy steels, but we try to avoid that. HY80 has a lot, an HY100 have a lot of alloy addition, because they temper them at above a thousand degrees, they don't want to temper them in the 800 degree range in the steel mill, to lower the hardness. You could use less alloying element, save hundreds of dollars a ton, but you're going to not get the same toughness okay. It's not that the toughness falls off a cliff, it's just not as good, and we always want the best.

p17 18:41

Um, so there are different levels of preheat. When you go to some very difficult to weld materials, uh, like cast iron, you may have to preheat to 600 degrees Fahrenheit. Well who wants to weld on something at 600 degrees Fahrenheit? I mean if you barely, if you brush up against that — I mean you actually could probably start your cotton clothing on fire if you brushed up against it at 600 degrees, you're getting to the ignition point of a number of, uh, hydrogen, you know, uh, organic fibers and stuff. You certainly at 600 degrees, any piece of plastic, if you had a polyester shirt, hey that's, it's not toast, it's melted okay, and it's liable to start burning okay. You're getting close to the ignition temperature.

p18 19:27

Some materials that are very susceptible to residual stresses and cracking, such as some nickel based alloys — if I had a turbine blade, I've been to shops where they take turbine blades and they preheat them to a thousand degrees centigrade, which is almost 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, in order to be able to weld them, because just the residual stresses from cooling and shrinkage will crack that turbine blade alloy. It doesn't have very good ductility to begin with, and it has excellent high temperature strength — that's why you're using it in the turbine okay. So it won't deform in the turbine, and with that high strength at high temperatures it just cracks. And so they actually weld these things, they actually put an induction heater on it, the thing is glowing red when you do the electron beam weld to repair it okay, they do it in a vacuum. It's kind of pricey, but that little blade might be worth seven thousand dollars repaired, and it's worth junk — actually it's worth, it's actually worth about fifty dollars scrap metal you know, but it's worth seven thousand if you can repair it. So it's worth doing some pretty unusual preheats in some alloys, but not steels okay.

p19 20:36

The highest temperature I've ever seen in steel preheat is about 600, and that's for a very thick highly restrained steel. Most steels are not above about 400. But even though I told you about the Sea Wolf and the blue jelly suits and stuff, when they redid the Sea Wolf they didn't want to have it crack a second time okay, so that's why they went to the blue jelly suits. And they actually, I think they shut down production at Electric Boat for about a year. But even that sort of cost a few dollars, because you might be able to lay off the hourly workers but you can't lay off the salaried workers — they still got to come and eat their lunch in the cafeteria okay. Actually they had a lot to do trying to figure out how to solve the problem okay.

p20 21:22

Any questions on preheat? We're going to go through preheating spades now, because I just handed around part of the structural welding code, and we're talking about welding something like this. [Tom holds up a welded sample.] This is, I think I got this from Electric Boat back up about thirty or thirty-five years ago. This is an actual weld in one inch thick HY80 made by Electric Boat, has a backing bar because they welded from one side. If you actually measure it very carefully you actually see some distortion here — see, if I drew a straight line here it wouldn't be — the thing is V right? Because the V shape weld. You can also see the size of the heat affected zone here, this is weld metal in the slightly lighter gray, the darker blacker region is the heat affected zone of the weld. You've got a heat affected zone down here. This piece is probably not HY80 — HY80 is expensive steel, if you're just using a backing bar and you're going to cut it off later, use a piece of cheap old carbon steel okay. But, and this is not rusted, anybody want to know why it didn't rust? Because it's black iron, it's actually got a layer of other stuff on it, but the poly surface — we sprayed it with a clear coat okay, clear lacquer, so it wouldn't rust.

p21 22:49

Let me also hand around, while we're going to start to talk about how to control preheat — there are lots of books, this just a single page sheet of carbon equivalents there, and I'm going to talk about carbon equivalents. There are lots of books from the 1930s, which, 1940s was the first edition of Stout and Doty I think, on how to weld steels without hydrogen cracking. In the mid 60s Frank Coe came out with his book from the British Welding Institute, which is sort of based on the research they did because of the Liberty ships, at the British Welding Institute. Anyway, there are a number of things, but finally starting about ten or fifteen years ago, the American Welding Society, which publishes the structural welding code, that's been around since about 1920.

p22 23:44

The two most widely used welding codes in the world are the ASME code, which is — some people call it the granddaddy code, it had its 100th anniversary about five or six years ago okay. And it was kind of the first welding code. Arc welding didn't start until the 1880s, anyway, it actually was invented in 1806 or so by Sir Humphry Davy, who was using Volta's piles they called them, but they were batteries. And he had — they were a research thing okay. But Alexandra Volter [Alessandro Volta] had developed this electrochemical cell which he called a pile, P-I-L-E, because it was a pile of plates okay. And Sir Humphry Davy had this and he was studying arcs. In fact, he called it an arc because he had two electrodes which he placed together and he pulled them apart, and it formed an arch. That's where the word welding arc comes from.

p23 24:40

And he found this was a pretty interesting heat source, it would melt the tips of the steel or the steels with the materials he had. So of course one of the first things — and you'll get this in my fusion welding lecture — one of the first things anyone does with a new heat source is they try to weld with it, whether it's a laser. The Navy developed particle beam weapons in the mid 80s to try to shoot down incoming missiles, and they couldn't do anything with it. So in the early 90s they had a workshop at White Oak to figure out — with peace breaking out with the former Soviet Union, we spent a quarter billion dollars developing these high-energy electron beams that would go through the air, and they're supposed to shoot down an incoming missile. And we don't need it anymore, what are we going to do with this quarter billion dollar technology? And they asked me to come down and talk about whether they could weld submarines. And I went and said, well maybe you could melt a submarine, but you can't weld with that much energy okay. Because you only need about, uh, 10 to 50 kilowatts to make a weld in that piece of HY80 that's going around, and they had megawatts okay.

p24 25:46

The only problem with that high energy electron beam, it worked great in a vacuum, but unfortunately the ocean is not in a vacuum, it's got air above it. And they ran into something called a hose instability. So it would — you could shoot what should have been a straight beam coming out, but then the atmosphere would cause those electrons to whip around like the end of a garden hose that wasn't restrained that had water flow. That's why they called the — physicists called a hose instability. And so you actually could shoot down missiles from 30 miles away, but you had to have a very cooperative missile that would run into your beam okay, you couldn't aim it. They could shoot down something 30 inches away, but they determined that wasn't far enough away to protect the ship. Anyway, it's only a quarter billion dollars, it was a DARPA [DARPA] project, don't blame just the Navy, but it was managed by the Navy.

p25 26:36

Anyway, so the second most widely used, and actually probably the most widely used today, is the structural welding code. In the United States and many parts of the world you can't build a bridge or a building without using the structural welding code. Not as rigorous as the ASME boiler and pressure vessel code. The consequences of a boiler and pressure vessel code failure is you basically wipe out a whole city block or more okay. The consequence of a bridge or a building falling down is a few people get killed, a few cars you know get destroyed or something, but it's not as serious. So the requirements are not quite as strict.

p26 27:18

I should have brought you an earlier one. This is the 2010, I think they should be coming out with a new one. Um, when I started buying these thirty-five years ago or whatever, they were one-third the thickness or one-quarter of the thickness, and they cost about 80 bucks. Now they cost about 400, because all of the code writing authorities learned in the 1990s they could make a small fortune by charging a lot of money for the codes, because you can't fabricate unless you follow the code, which means your engineers all have to have copies. So someone has to have, you know, how many copies of this code? And yeah, you can have it in digital form, but you still have to pay for that digital copy. So the American Welding Society used to limp along on a couple of million dollars a year, now makes 10 or 15 million dollars a year, not just by selling codes but by certifying welders, which we're going to talk about in a little bit. It's become big business. And they used to have like one or two million dollars in savings, and I just looked at the balance sheet in the Welding Journal last week, and they have 90 million dollars in the bank okay.

p27 28:27

So it's been a big business for societies. And for a while there they decided this was such a great deal — the boiler pressure vessel code comes out every three years, and would cost you sixteen thousand dollars to buy the whole boiler pressure vessel code every three years. Now they give you semi-annual updates which comes free with a sixteen thousand dollar subscription. Um, this only costs four hundred, but they decided a few years ago to bring out a new edition every year, so they could get four hundred dollars from everybody every year. Well, they got so many squawks that uh, you know, comes out every three years again. Anyway.

p28 29:07

So the boiler impression — or the structural welding code, um, has included in it for the last ten or twelve years an Annex I, which is guideline on alternative methods for determining preheat. Uh, preheat is a complex subject, but this is the best by far explanation, and you now have a copy of this. There are two basic methods of determining preheat which are right down here. There's the hardness control and the hydrogen control. Well you now know what those mean okay. Hardness is, you don't want it to get too hard because the harder it is the bigger that stress circle in that Venn diagram becomes. And the hydrogen control, you don't want to get too big because the bigger that environmental circle gets okay.

p29 30:02

So if I've got this Venn diagram — maybe I'll draw my Venn diagram. I can either control hardness, so if I have a material, and I have a certain amount of hydrogen, which we call the environment, which was really hydrogen, or I could have hardness, and if I can control my hardness, which is my stress, I can get zero overlap, no hydrogen cracking right? No intersection there. Or I can have my circle of material, I can have a lot of stress, and I can control my hydrogen and I have no overlap right? So those are the two methods. You can't well — you could control the material, but usually some design engineer has told you, you shall make it out of HY100, or you shall make it out of whatever. You could control the material but that's a whole new design.

p30 31:15

So if you look and think about it, well what else do you have other than those two circles to control? So there's the hardness control in the heat affected zone, because that's where the cracks usually occur, except in the Sea Wolf where it occurred in the weld metal, which was a big surprise, because it had always occurred in heat affected zone before, but they didn't have such overmatching weld metal strength okay. So the selection of method — this first one is hydrogen, well I'm sorry, yeah well, let me back up. Methods — this is hardness control, and they don't say much about hardness control here, we'll get to it later, uh, down here.

p31 31:58

So here's selection of the method, and the first thing you do is you calculate a carbon equivalent. And a carbon equivalent — I did mention carbon equivalent before, I think I talked about hardness and hardenability, actually I didn't do it in terms of carbon equivalent. But if I was talking about hardness, uh, the carbon controls the hardness of a steel, whereas the alloying elements control the depth to which hardening occurs. So if I have a carbon steel — and I told you a carbon steel, it's hard to quench it fast enough to get something much more than a sixteenth of an inch — and that HY80 that I sent around that had a heat affected zone that's more like a quarter of an inch, so I couldn't even get high hardness over that full heat affected zone in a carbon steel, but an alloy steel I can. So if you remember I talked about hardness versus hardenability — one was a function of the carbon content, the other one is function of the thickness and a function of the alloy content.

p32 33:00

Well the carbon equivalent is basically a measure of how deep I can harden that heat affected zone in that steel with a certain alloy content. So it starts with the hardness — or carbon equivalent — starts with the carbon, and manganese and silicon don't add as much hardenability as carbon does, you divide by six. Chrome moly and vanadium you divide by five. Nickel and copper you divide by 15. This is one of the formula okay. There are many formula. And so out of Easterling's book, in an appendix he lists a lot, and I handed this out, you don't have to be able to read all this from the board, so don't worry about it too much. But the — by the way, we need to in general be panning, you know, the screen to get the — not on this one, but some of the others if I'm talking about things on the screen.

p33 34:00

Here's that same carbon equivalent formula, here's other carbon equivalent formulas that lots of people have developed over the years. And I know you can't read it from the screen, but I handed it out, because it is so busy. And you're going to see that here in the AWS Annex I, they use not just this one but another one okay. So you go through and you look from the carbon equivalent, and it says figure out whether you are in Zones 1, 2, or 3. Well you read this — let me tell you, I'm going through this in a little detail because the first time I ever read this it took me about three hours over two days to figure out what this thing was telling me. And when I finally understood it I thought oh, this is pretty good, but it took me three hours to figure out, and I knew something about some of this stuff okay.

p34 34:49

Well you have to now go to this plot, which tells you what Zones 1, 2, and 3 are okay. So here's Zones 1, 2, and 3, and of course it's not the first figure, it's uh, actually it is the first figure, it's not the first table. Zone classification of steels, carbon content versus carbon equivalent. So I'm plotting carbon content versus, or hardness versus hardenability if you will. And down here in the low hardness zone, less than 10 points of carbon, I can't get high hardness no matter what. And so if I want to control hardness, Zone 1, those steels are easy to weld okay, no matter what their carbon equivalent or the depth of hardenability, because a tenth of a percent carbon won't give me more than about Rockwell C 30 or 25, or no, it won't give me more than about, what, Rockwell C30 let's say.

p35 35:45

Zone 2, I have a higher carbon — well, I have higher carbon and so I can get higher hardness, but if my carbon equivalent, the depth of hardening, is not above about 0.5 I'm in pretty good shape. The good thing about HY80 is it's right about, actually HY80 is right about in here, it's in Zone 2. You have to use some preheat. Down here in Zone 1 you're going to find you don't need preheat at all in most cases. HY80's right in here, HY100, higher strength, same carbon, is getting right up against this line. And Zone 3, high depth of hardening, high hardness potential hardness, and these are the ones that are going to take a lot of preheat okay. So the first thing you do in hardness control is just determine whether you're in Zones 1, 2, or 3. If you're lucky and you're welding bridge steels and stuff like that, or HSLA steels, you're going to find you're in Zone 1, and you don't have to do much more than just come up with 50 to 100 degrees to get the moisture off okay.

p36 36:51

Now that's the — so the hardness method, going through here, is you use the carbon equivalent and you look at another plot and determine whether you have a maximum HAZ zone hardness of 400 or 350 Vickers from Figure 1.2. Well, it turns out 400 —