§1. Closing on hydrogen cracking [00:01]
They realized this was a critical path, and the volume was increasing. They had another one scheduled to come on stream two months after this one actually blew up. So they actually dodged that bullet. How'd you like to have no new aircraft engines for three years? That was partly a hydrogen cracking problem. Only cost forty million dollars. So there's lots of stories of hydrogen cracking.
§2. Weld microstructure and the heat-affected zone [00:35]
[Tom returns to the projector and pulls up a weld micrograph.] This is the microstructure of a steel weld. You have the weld metal, which is sort of columnar; you have a coarse grain region in the heat-affected zone; you have a finer grain region. We can give titles to these: solidified weld metal; solid-liquid transition zone, where you actually have what we sometimes call the mushy zone — it's like a slurpee; grain growth zone with the large grain size; recrystallized zone where you get far finer grains; partially transformed temperate zone; and unaffected base metal. Don't worry about all that. You can map that onto the phase diagram and the temperatures on this phase diagram. I think this comes out of Easterling's book.
But you can get lots of different properties in here.
§3. The Quincy LNG tanker steel skirt [01:48]
To give you another example of getting different properties: when I was an engineer at Bethlehem Steel — this is for you Coast Guard folks — they were building LNG tankers right down here in Quincy, Massachusetts. It was an old shipyard that Bethlehem Steel had built in World War One I think. They were building the great big spherical LNG tankers, and they had to have a steel skirt. It was basically just a cylinder, about a hundred and fifty feet in diameter, and you put the sphere on top of this skirt. So you have this big aluminum sphere and then you have a skirt that is the pedestal that the sphere sits on.
I was trying to develop a very weldable steel for this steel skirt. They were using an ASTM A537 steel, which was good to minus 20 degrees. If you looked in the Coast Guard regs for this critical application — because you certainly don't want to lose your pedestal that's holding all this liquid natural gas — they said you had to measure the toughness, a Charpy test for impact, right at the center of the weld metal, right at the toe of the weld, and then one millimeter, three millimeters, and five millimeters away. So you're trying to test each one of these different zones for toughness, because different things can happen and you could lose your toughness in some of those regions.
Well, I learned several things as a young engineer. We had to have our machining of these test pieces done at the Bethlehem Steel plant. If they weren't busy and you sent something down to be machined, you'd pay a fortune for it, because they had to fill up their time. The machinists would take their time. You'd ask the foreman, "Are you busy?" and if he said yes, you'd ship your stuff down because you wouldn't get overcharged for it. But if they weren't busy, you'd get overcharged. He never did figure out that when we called up and asked how busy he was, if he said he was busy he'd get work, and if he said he wasn't busy he wouldn't get work. Completely dysfunctional system. Same company — that's the plant, this is the research department. You can call it the same company but they don't work for the same purposes. Just like any other organization, sub-optimized.
Anyway, we'd send them down, get them machined, send them back, and a technician would etch them and mark them off with a punch mark. Then they'd put the little notch in. We'd send it back down, they put the notch in, and then we'd test them for toughness. You had to meet 20 foot-pounds at minus 20 degrees Fahrenheit, because that was the Coast Guard reg.
They were making the steel at Burns [Sparrows] — at Sparrows Point, Maryland, Bethlehem Steel's steel-making facility. And they were having a hard time getting 20 foot-pounds even in the base plate. They would often have to double normalize, go through two heat treatments to get finer grain, higher toughness steel. Sometimes they'd have to triple normalize. Now if they'd gone to low-sulfur steel for an extra twenty bucks a ton, they could have easily gotten the properties. But Bethlehem Steel's management was too cheap to do that. They would much rather spend forty dollars in extra normalizing than to pay twenty dollars and give it away.
The average toughness on the plates going to the shipyard had to meet a 20-foot-pound minimum, and the average was just under 21. Not a lot of leeway on what we were shipping. Most of them were down around 15 to 19 on the first normalize, and they'd have to second normalize some of them, even triple normalize. But every now and then one of the plates would come in at 30 foot-pounds.
What the shipyard would do is go out, find that plate, and cut it up into test plates. Every weld that went on the ship had a runoff tab. If I was welding a seam, you had to have a runoff tab — an extra 12 inches of weld so you could cut it up for testing, just like the prolongation I was talking about. So they were testing 30-foot-pound plate every time. The weld might degrade something from 21 to 15, but the Coast Guard got a report that they were all above 20, because it started out at 30 and might drop down to 24. Isn't that great. Hey, we're only talking safety here.
§4. Charpy specifications and safety-factor inflation [07:10]
It turns out it's not that big a deal, because what's happened over the years is we put safety factors on top of safety factors. That report I showed you from 1946 showed that the problem for the Liberty ships were Liberty ships that had less than 10 foot-pounds of toughness. So when they came out in the 1950s with requirements they said, we'll add another 5 foot-pounds — you have to have 15 foot-pounds minimum. That was through the 50s and 60s. Then starting in the 70s the Coast Guard decided, well, some people are playing games, we'll go to 20 as the minimum. And then when they started building pipelines in Alaska and places they said, let's go to 30. At one point they were talking about going to 80 foot-pounds minimum, which is just way beyond anything anyone would ever need. Hey, but if you're not paying for it and you're just regulating someone, you just tell them what to do. You don't care — it's their nickel, not yours.
So it turns out they were probably safe because we had an extra 10 foot-pounds in there to begin with. But in fact people will shave things and play games to get around various requirements.
§5. Welding productivity by process [08:33]
We're about to finish up steels, but not quite. I want to talk a little bit about fatigue design — actually before I talk about fatigue design I have some other things on productivity.
You can make welds in steel at — this is pounds per hour, this is kilograms per hour, whichever numbers you like. If you're welding with stick electrodes — and these are stick electrode numbers for shielded metal arc welding — you're probably welding in the seven-pounds-per-hour range, unless you have an iron powder electrode like 7024 or 7018. So for a person using one of these they can legally lay down about seven pounds an hour of electrode.
If you go to gas tungsten arc welding, you're probably only welding at about the same rate, maybe even less. If you go to gas metal arc welding, you can get significantly higher productivity. That's because up here the welder is only welding — the arc is only on 25 percent of the time, maybe 30 percent. The rest of the time he's chipping slag, throwing away his welding stubs, grinding or whatever. The manual welder has only got the arc on 25 to 30 percent of the time max, and a lot of times it's only five or ten percent. Gas metal arc welding, where you don't have any slag to chip off and you have a continuous feed electrode, you can get 10 to 15 pounds an hour — you can double your productivity.
There's something called flux-cored arc welding which is similar to gas metal arc welding. There's submerged arc welding, which can only be done in the flat position typically, in a panel line or something. You have an eighth-inch or even five-sixteenths-inch diameter great big electrode. Instead of a hundred or two hundred amps up here, you might be using five or six hundred amps down here. Put down great big welds. You can get to 40 or 50 pounds an hour. If you add iron powder to your flux, you can basically melt in the iron powder. We actually use iron powder on some electrodes — the 7018, 7024 have some iron powder in them — so you're not just melting in the arc, you're actually incorporating iron powder that melts into the liquid metal pool.
You can get above 160 pounds an hour in submerged arc welding. I can go with one electrode, two, three, four, or five electrodes. With five electrodes — this is kind of like a pipe shop where I'm welding miles and miles of pipe, taking plate and turning it into a circle and welding the seam. Could be a panel line. Most panel lines don't go more than two or three electrodes. But you can get 80 pounds an hour, which is 10 times what you're going to get out there in the ways. You can only do it in the flat position, great big puddles, but very high productivity and generally good high quality welds. So you should be a little bit aware of some of the productivity aspects.
§6. Multi-electrode submerged arc and the physics of parallel arcs [12:03]
Five different power supplies — the first one might be DC, the second might be AC, or the second two might be AC. The electrical engineers have a field day here, because you have to be careful about AC and DC and different phases of the AC. You can't just use regular old three-phase AC on these things; you actually have to have things that are 180 degrees out of phase, because these arcs can start interacting with each other. But it can be all one liquid puddle, and you could have five or six electrodes and five power supplies all in a puddle that could be ten inches long.
The weld puddle is not three-quarters of an inch long — you actually end up going very fast and getting this long puddle with five independent electrodes in there. Why do they need to be independent? Because of the arc characteristics. You can't run arcs in parallel. From basic physics, an arc is not a resistive element — it actually is a negative-resistance element. If you try to run two arcs in parallel, from a physics point of view one will snuff out the other and you'll carry all the current in one arc. The conductivity of the plasma becomes much greater with more current. So if you have fifty percent of your current here and fifty percent here, one of them will take a hundred percent of the current and starve the other. You have to have a separate power supply for each electrode so they don't see each other electrically. Then if you have AC or DC you have to worry about magnetic interactions between them. So it gets to be sort of messy from an electrical engineering point of view, but from a physics point of view you can't run arcs in parallel.
§7. Inside a shipyard panel line [13:52]
Student: What does the equipment look like? Is that a robotic weld, or is that a manual?
It's a great big machine, wire-fed. The machine might be a million-dollar welder, with five electrodes — it's actually in a panel line, a big gantry crane. I've been talking about panel lines, I assume some of you have been through shipyards. How many people have seen a panel line? Maybe I should ask that question. No one's seen a panel line. You've seen a panel?
Student: You're just talking about the automated system.
Yeah. The plate comes in from the steel mill on some ship or on a railroad car, and it's picked up by great big magnets and brought over to a lay-down yard.
Somewhere near that lay-down yard is a big building, about 20 or 30 feet tall, with a welding panel line. It's going to be at least half the size of a football field, if not the size of two football fields. If you go to something like the Hyundai shipyard in Ulsan, Korea, it'll be two football fields. They bring the plate in, they have a gantry crane that is the full width of that plate, and they have the welding equipment on this gantry crane. The gantry crane is only about 10 or 15 feet tall, but it's got 20 tons of welding equipment on it.
They'll bring the plate in, bring another plate, and weld the two plates together to make a big plate. Then weld another plate. They continuously weld these plates, and then further down they cut out all the weird shapes. You don't make ships out of rectangular plates — you make them out of curved plates. So in a panel line you want to take the biggest plates you can buy from the steel mill and weld them together into bigger plates that you can cut big sections out of, to make these huge things that you're going to form and shape and turn into the sides of the ship.
In a panel line, when you've just got flat plates and you're welding square plates together, you want the highest productivity you can. Once you start cutting them into weird shapes and putting them up against some egg-crate construction, now you've got some guy with a stick electrode, and it's much harder to automate. You should have asked me what's a panel line. Almost none of you have been to a SupShip [Supervisor of Shipbuilding office]. Usually half the people in the class have been to a SupShip, but here no one has.
You don't have panel lines with two-inch plate or three-inch plate — I'm not supposed to say with that thickness. They might have a small panel line, but in general you take the big heavy plate to the form shop and they form it like a press brake that takes a flat plate and turns it into a curved plate, which is an art in itself. They have these big plywood forms. They may do it with lasers now, but when I was there, they would have a master craftsman who had been working at this for 35 years. He'd take this big plywood form that had the shape, they'd form the plate, and he'd take the plywood form up and see if it fit. If it didn't, he'd hit it again to shape it back. You'd have to have tolerances like an eighth of an inch on some of it — the outer surface of the sub has got to be pretty precise for hydrodynamic reasons.
You ought to get a tour of a shipyard someday, both a surface shipyard and a sub shipyard, because they're very different. Extremely different. I can't give you a tour of the shipyard, sorry about that. In fact I can't even get into a shipyard anymore.