§1. Crystal bar titanium and zirconium for nuclear fuel cladding [00:04]
[Tom passes around a sample of crystal bar titanium.] This is crystal bar titanium. I don't have a piece of crystal bar zirconium, but they're both made the same way. You start with zirconium oxide or titanium dioxide. They're both relatively abundant in the Earth's crust, but then you have to convert them to zirconium tetrachloride or titanium tetrachloride. DuPont probably makes several million tons a year of titanium tetrachloride, because we then take that tetrachloride and oxidize it to very fine titanium dioxide. All the paint in all these rooms is titanium dioxide because it has a very high specular reflection. Actually zirconium oxide has a higher specular reflection than diamonds.
So if your fiancée doesn't like cubic zirconia, it's because she doesn't want something that sparkles more than diamonds. That's crystal bar titanium — the raw product. They start with a hot wire inside a vacuum system, introduce the titanium tetrachloride, the chloride goes off, decomposes, and you grow hundreds of crystals of very pure titanium. Centimeter-diameter cool pellets go in there, about thirty bucks a foot or a hundred dollars a meter. A hundred thousand meters typically — so that's ten million dollars just to fuel a plant. Navy reactors are smaller. They still use zirconium because the 0.18 barns cross-section is about the lowest of anything on the periodic table. Boron is something like 20 barns — that's why we use boron in water to control the neutron flux.
§2. Hot isostatic pressing and turbine blade repair [02:35]
We talked a little bit about HIP yesterday. [Tom holds up the titanium alloys notebook.] This shows the key strength range — forged titanium, which is pretty pricey, versus cast plus hot isostatic pressing, or just cast. They overlap quite a bit, but the hot isostatic pressing can get rid of the voids in the material and squeeze them out without changing the shape of the product. So think of it as forging without shape change.
The Air Force has a multiple-ten-million-dollar system out in Oklahoma City. They own a pair of jet engines, and this is a turbine blade where the tips have worn off. They built it up by welding — 25 passes, that's one millimeter. So they built up less than a centimeter, seven-tenths of a millimeter or so, and they machined it. They're refurbishing this blade, and the different microstructures show lots of little bitty weld passes to build that back up. Why? Because this kind of blade isn't hollow, it's not single crystal, but it still costs about $500,000, and it's worth repairing. Any questions?
§3. Lightweight materials overview: steel, titanium, aluminum, magnesium [04:22]
I'm going to talk about lightweight materials. This just came out of a book on lightweight materials. We've got steel, titanium, aluminum, magnesium alloys. Steel can have tremendous strength — and this is megapascal, so we're talking 250 ksi. Titanium landing gears for aircraft — we used to have 250 or 300 ksi steels, which are very susceptible and require a tremendous amount of maintenance to make sure you don't have any hydrogen embrittlement or corrosion.
I remember being told the first thing you design when you're going to build a new aircraft is the landing gear, because everything else depends on the landing gear and how much force it can take at impact. So you design the landing gear, and then you build the structure up from that, because it has to absorb that landing force. The rest of the structure has to dissipate it. You have some ballpark of the overall aircraft weight, you design the landing gear, and you build all the structures out from there. The fuselage hangs on the wings. In fact on a 747, supposedly the fuselage is held onto the wings with four bolts — very high-strength nickel superalloy bolts in this strength range, which are not susceptible to the hydrogen damage problem.
High-strength steel is very susceptible. The types of steels you guys are going to use — HY-100 here — because you're worried about it being weldable, and you have to allow for the fact that you forgot to put the same thing in. That was interesting with the Coast Guard, where you had to scrap a couple of 103-foot cutters.
Titanium alloys can get to 200 ksi, but for now Ti-6Al-4V is the workhorse alloy. We'll get to that later. The Navy has a Ti-100 they developed back in the 60s, but again it's a hundred ksi. It's a lot lighter, so greater capability for submersibles. The highest-strength aluminum alloys are found in baseball bats — up to a hundred ksi or just over. We'll talk about why. The typical alloys are 80 to 90 ksi for aircraft wings. 2014 is a copper alloy that has been around since the 1920s. In fact the Wright brothers' engine block — which goes back over a hundred years — was 2014. 6061 is the workhorse, 50 ksi strength. Magnesium alloys — not a lot of them, we'll talk about why. Magnesium has one wonderful property, that it's lightweight, but two Achilles heels: it can barely be welded, and it is very corrosion-prone, it oxidizes — don't look at it.
§4. Density and the value of lightweight [08:51]
To give you an idea of some of these densities — [Tom holds up samples of zinc, magnesium, aluminum, and titanium.] here is a piece of zinc, which is about ten percent less than the density of steel. So think of this as roughly steel. There's magnesium — you can feel the density. Here's aluminum. Here's a piece of titanium. Comparable-size pieces. If you divide by the density of each one, you find titanium at the highest strength, and all the alloys are about the same when corrected for density.
Why do you correct for density? If something doesn't move, we don't care. You put it on the ground, the earth doesn't move, there's no problem. But if anything moves we want lightweight, and the faster it moves the more you value lightweight. In my material selection lecture I go through this in some detail. Everybody wants the lightweight thing — that's why they look at cell phones. People look at aerogels and get all excited because they're so light. It has no mechanical properties, but it's light. That's the kind of trade-off in some of these properties.
§5. Aluminum alloy series: thousand through seven thousand [10:34]
Let's start with the aluminum alloys. They go by a four-digit number, just like the American Iron and Steel Institute 1018 steel. There's no 1018 aluminum, but there's a thousand series, 2000 series, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000, and even an 8000 — this book didn't go out that far. The thousand series is not heat-treatable. It's basically nearly pure aluminum. For example, 1100 is 99 percent aluminum and the rest is just impurities. The heat-treatable alloys are the 2000 series, aluminum-copper alloys. Virtually all the aluminum alloy systems form a phase diagram that looks eutectic.
This is percent copper, increasing. This is a hundred percent aluminum, and this is five percent. 660 centigrade is the melting point here, 540 or so here — about a 120 degree centigrade temperature differential. Since aluminum melts at 660, it doesn't have really good high-temperature properties. In fact some of these alloys are not very good at all at temperatures above even 200 degrees Fahrenheit. Boil water and you wipe them out. So these are heat-treatable alloys, and 2219 is a modern alloy. That's what they used to build the Space Shuttle main tank. These are lightweight. 2219 was a four-and-a-half percent copper alloy that was more weldable than some of the others. If you tried to weld the Wright brothers' crankcase or the cylinder housing for their engine with gas tungsten arc, you'd crack it. You'd melt it and you'd have nice cracks — pull that rope, melted metal right out. Same type of problem as you have on Monel — you get cracking, equation melting in the heat-affected zone in the copper interiors.
The non-heat-treatable 3000 series — here's your beer can stock. Largest tonnage use of aluminum. At one time forty percent of all the aluminum in the world went into beer cans. It's a major part of the aluminum industry — billion-dollar plants, and all they do is turn out cheap stock for the beverage manufacturers. Non-heat-treatable, with one or two percent manganese for higher strength. The 4000 series have silicon — basically welding wire. The most common welding wires are nearly pure aluminum — 4043, 4042. Non-heat-treatable. The 5000 series, the Navy uses for building hulls, and has for fifty years. They're aluminum-magnesium alloys.
§6. Magnesium: sacrificial anodes, divers' hydrogen, and automotive applications [14:33]
There are two big uses of magnesium in the world. The biggest is alloying with aluminum — just like the biggest use of manganese is alloying with steel, where ninety percent of manganese goes into steel. In magnesium, about thirty or forty percent goes into sacrificial anodes for corrosion protection — things like hot water tanks. Magnesium's best property of all is that it corrodes really well.
The Navy loves it. Panama City is where Navy divers do things, and they have a little research lab. A number of years ago they developed a magnesium-carbon composite. They take carbon powders and magnesium powders and press them together, and you can stick this in seawater. If you try to polish it in the laboratory and you use a water-based polish slurry, it would corrode faster than the new propulsion — so they use oil-based polishing. But if you stick it in seawater, one use they found was salvage. You put it in a little plastic bag. The diver takes it down beneath the surface, gets a big plastic part, puts it over whatever he wants to lift, connects it, puts the little plastic-coated piece of magnesium-carbon alloy underneath, breaks the bag, seawater comes in, and he generates a hydrogen bubble that floats the thing to the surface. That's how fast it corrodes — you can generate your own hydrogen underwater. So you don't have to carry big tanks of gas that are lighter than water; you can carry a little thing and the water will produce your own gas.
The other thing they did — it corrodes so fast that in cold environments they can strap it to the diver's belt, and he can punch the bag and it will create enough heat to keep him warm. Those are two examples just to give you an idea how fast magnesium oxidizes. That's why we don't use it much. But the Department of Energy has been spending tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars every year for the last fifty years on the idea that if we can use magnesium in automobiles we can take a thousand pounds out of every automobile and it'll be great for sales — you're going to be replacing those cars every six months.
In fact they do use magnesium under the dashboard, where you can't see the corrosion and where it's protected from the elements in the passenger compartment. Some of the dashboard substructure will be a cast magnesium panel. They also use it in helicopters and other aircraft, because helicopters get two hours of maintenance for every hour of flight. If you're going to check things that often during maintenance anyway, you can use it for aerospace when you need lightweight materials — just a few maintenance issues.
§7. Aircraft brakes and lease-by-the-hour maintenance economics [18:13]
The brakes on big aircraft are actually carbon-carbon composite. Very expensive. It's possible they might use some magnesium in some of the calipers and the structure that holds the brake pads, but the brake pads themselves get so hot when you're trying to stop 450 tons rolling down the highway at a hundred miles an hour. You need to dissipate a lot of energy. I watched a program years ago on the certification process of the Boeing 777. They had to land the aircraft and stop it in such-and-such a distance, and then the brakes could catch fire — but they had to have at least three minutes before the fire crew could put it out, because in a real-world situation the fire department's not standing right there at the end of the runway. So you have to pass tests where you don't destroy the rest of the engines or have hydraulic leaks for three minutes. You can have a big flaming fire and your carbon-carbon composite brakes starting to burn. Carbon-carbon composite — that's what we use for cruise missile engines and things like that. Takes high temperatures, but they don't last very long.
Here's how they commercially handle brake wear in the commercial airlines. United or American or whatever — they don't own the brakes. Honeywell, who makes the brakes, leases the brakes to the airline, and if they wear out quickly, Honeywell has to provide more brakes under contract. If you're the mechanic working for United or American and you look at it and decide it needs new brakes, that doesn't cost the airline anything except the labor to replace the brakes. Honeywell pays for the parts. So Honeywell has an incentive to develop brakes with long lifetime, and the airline knows exactly how much it's spending on brakes for every landing because they're paying by the landing.
They do the same thing now with engines. Either Pratt & Whitney or General Electric — or it could be a brokerage firm — leases the engine to the airline, and the airline pays power-by-the-hour. They pay so much for every hour the engine operates, and so the owner of the engine has every incentive to make engines last for a long time and not have to go back for maintenance overhauls, because they're getting the profit out of the long-lasting engine. Again, the mechanic has no incentive not to replace the engine if there's something wrong — it doesn't cost the airline anything new. The brokerage company or Pratt & Whitney has them in their hub, they come in these circular shipping casts, the airline just pays the labor and the time to bolt it on.
Commercial airlines are even getting to the point where they don't want to own the aircraft. I haven't quite gotten to aircraft-by-the-hour yet, but they're heading in that direction. Start with brakes, end with engines. It does provide right incentives for the mechanics — replace it if you need to. There's a balance — the airline still has to pay labor to replace it, but the cost of the parts is paid for by someone who's getting a fee for every landing.
§8. 5000, 6000, 7000, 8000 series weldability and a question about cookware [22:46]
Where we operate, we have the 5000 series of non-heat-treatable alloys, and we can get 100 percent joint efficiency in the weld. 5152, 5454 — they come up with a couple of new ones now. The heat-treatable magnesium-silicon alloys — you have to heat them up, quench in water, and bring up to temperature for high strength. You can get double the strength compared to the 5000 series, but when you weld 6061, you may only get fifty or sixty percent joint efficiency. You cannot get a hundred percent. They have twice the strength, but once you weld it, everything becomes a casting again, and castings are not heat-treated. You could weld it and then re-heat-treat the weldment, and you can get the strength back up, but that gets really expensive on a complex shape.
The 7000 series are the highest strength — these are things like the wings on aircraft. And then the 8000 series, which is a catch-all, includes the aluminum-lithium alloys. Other elements are in the 8000 and 9000 series and still in use. Those are the standard designations.
Student: The other day you showed us that stainless steel pot that was cracking — they punched aluminum out into the bottom?
Yeah, why do you put it on the base there? Because of the good thermal conductivity. With your steel pots, if you're boiling water sometimes it can be damaged, so they put copper or aluminum on the bottom. Pure aluminum has excellent water corrosion resistance — the right aluminum alloys have excellent freshwater corrosion resistance. We build sewage treatment plants out of aluminum. They don't rust, if you pick the right alloys that don't have pitting or stress corrosion cracking problems, and there are plenty that don't. They tend to be lower strength, but you go down to Deer Island treatment facility, where they clean up across the harbor water — it's all lower-strength aluminum piping carrying dirty water, and it works. So aluminum actually has excellent corrosion resistance. And aluminum foil — a regular fire is just above the melting temperature of aluminum, but you don't melt the aluminum for cooking purposes because there's steam to cool it. You're cooking something with water. If you've been a Boy Scout, you've had a foil dinner, wrapped it in aluminum foil. If you put a steel bolt in there and put it in the fire, you'll probably melt your aluminum foil, because there's no steam to cool it. You can melt the foil in a hot fire, but you don't usually, because just a little bit of moisture in what you're cooking cools it.
Okay, so let's take a ten-minute break.