§1. Alcoa as an integrated monopoly [00:00]
I was looking for this slide the other day. This is the Alcoa book called From Monopoly to Competition. It wasn't written by Alcoa — it's written by someone in the media, and he interviewed lots of people from Alcoa. Most books written about companies are written by the companies, paid for by the companies, sort of biased. This guy actually goes through and says a lot of things. I showed you the picture of the nice beautiful Pittsburgh Reduction Company and then the real picture. Alcoa wouldn't put that in if they had paid for the book.
On the eve of World War II, Alcoa had a monopoly in bauxite — which is the raw material for the Hall cell — and alumina, which is an even purer material, and making pure aluminum. Alcoa owned the business in the United States; they were the only ones in the business. Fabricated aluminum products: on average, foil was only fifty percent. Who was the other big foil producer in aluminum? Reynolds. And why did Reynolds go into the foil business? Reynolds is part of Reynolds Tobacco — or was part of Reynolds Tobacco — the Reynolds family of Richmond, Virginia. They needed something to wrap their cigarettes in, and they decided we use enough foil we might as well start our own aluminum foil business. So Reynolds Aluminum is a spin-off of Reynolds Tobacco.
That's why Alcoa only had fifty percent. It turns out the only three aluminum companies of note were Alcoa, Kaiser, and Reynolds was very specialized at that time. They've grown in what they do. Alcoa was a pretty well integrated monopoly. Remember there were other integrated monopolies: Henry Ford making automobiles, he had his own steel plant, he had his own glass plant. Alcoa had their own hydroelectric plants. They built big dams. Anybody from eastern Tennessee? There's a town right near Knoxville called Alcoa. You fly into the airport for Knoxville, you'll be flying into Alcoa, Tennessee. Alcoa built hydroelectric plants in the Smoky Mountains. They started out at Niagara Falls back in the 1890s, because that's where you get your electricity. By 1910 they were going to other places where they had wild rivers and building dams and building big Hall cell plants. Alcoa still has a plant in Alcoa, Tennessee.
§2. Course schedule and themes from Tuesday [03:00]
That brings us up to time. Any questions from people who just showed up? Okay. The schedule: Dr. Belmar will do Friday and Tuesday, Monday's a holiday, we'll start presentations on Wednesday and Thursday. The reason I wanted to get things started is because things come up, and it looks like next Friday I've got to be in Houston. So the people who are listed here for Friday — I'll have Jerry send this around, we still have some people to sign up. It looks like we are going to run into November 3rd if I have to cancel next Friday's presentations. Hopefully I won't have to cancel too many. All the other days are good. I didn't put down the 30th and 31st because I have to be in Houston on those days. We handed this out so most people should have an idea of what the schedule is.
The themes from Tuesday: the brittleness of glass, which makes it unfit as a structural material in general, is overcome by surface modification. You can encapsulate — that's called fiberglass. You can use thermal processes — that's called tempered glass. You can use chemical processes — that's called ion exchange, where you substitute the sodium atoms with potassium atoms. Or if you really want to get a lot, you can make a lithiated glass and substitute lithium with potassium and you get an even bigger difference.
So glass is a structural material. Whatever the rule is, there's usually exceptions to the rule. If I tell you the rule is you need fracture toughness to be a structural material, that's absolutely true, and that's an important thing. But glass has certain properties — it's transparent, and we like that for certain applications, and there's not a lot of other choices other than plastic, which doesn't have a lot of strength. Glass also can give you fantastic strength. Those fibers when they're freshly made can give you a half million psi. If you test them within minutes of forming the fiber, you can get 2 million psi on glass fibers. But within hours it's down to only half a million. That's still pretty good, it's just as good as Kevlar fiber. So you can make fiberglass, and we make boats out of fiberglass, and we've been doing it for years, because glass has very good strength, has terrible toughness, but we can get around that. You get the toughness by basically making a composite. And you can do thermal treatments to temper the glass so that it doesn't shatter with terrible shards that are going to kill people. You can do chemical tempering if you really want to spend some money. Thermal tempering takes a couple of minutes; chemical tempering takes hours, like three or four hours. So chemical tempered glass is not used as often, it's pricier, but it gives you a much thicker layer of protection. The chemical tempering gives you excellent properties of maybe 40 or 50 microns, and thermal depends on the thickness of the glass and it can also be a few microns as well. You've basically got to get rid of those scratches on the glass that go a tenth of a micron deep. Those are harmful. So that's glass.
§3. Stainless steel and the heat-treatable aluminum problem [07:02]
Since it's the last day I've got to cover the rest of the periodic table of structural materials. We've done most of the aluminum. The other theme from the other day is aluminum was a monopoly from 1890 to 1945. I told you that one of the Achilles heels of steel is corrosion. Steel rusts and we do all kinds of things to protect against that. The Swedes around 1907 added chromium to steel at more than ten percent and came up with stainless steel. We use a significant amount of stainless steel — about two to five percent of a typical steel industry is going to be in stainless. So in the United States, if we use 100 million tons of steel a year we might use between two and five million tons of stainless. There are five general types: ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, duplex, and precipitation hardening. The big one is austenitic — that's 304 or 18-8 stainless steel. There's a whole genealogy chart of this. We don't have time to go through all of these.
But there are problems with stainless steels. My experience is, although stainless steels are two percent of all steels, which makes them about two percent of all metals, they constitute thirty percent of all the problems and failures. That's because everybody figures, oh, it's stainless. A lot of people read some things and they say it's stainless — it's not stain free. About once or twice a year, someone will bring me a piece of something and say, this was supposed to be stainless steel, it's all rusty so it can't be stainless, someone gave me the wrong material. I say, no, that's stainless. You get rid of that protective chromium oxide skin and it will rust, just like regular steel.
Now aluminum is the second most widely used metal. Two percent of steel — about 20 million tons a year. But it's five times the cost of steel. Historically aluminum was more precious than gold, and a significant fraction — like forty percent of all aluminum used to go into can stock, beverage containers. That's a sweet spot for the aluminum industry. There are a lot of different alloy series. There are heat treatable and wrought alloys. The wrought alloys are things like the 3000 series, which is can stock, and the 5000 series, which is aluminum-magnesium alloys. It's not heat treatable, but you can weld it and get essentially full strength. So if you're the US Navy and you're trying to build an aluminum ship that's lightweight, you're going to have to weld it, so you make it out of 5000 series. The aerospace industry likes to use heat treatable because they're going to rivet it, they don't have to weld it. Instead of getting 25 or 30 ksi in the wrought material — although they've got some wrought materials up in the 40 ksi that are a little bit stronger than the lowest strength steels — you can get 75 ksi heat treatable.
The problem with the heat treatable is they can start to degrade at fairly low temperatures. The supersonic transport Concorde was not limited on speed; it was limited on the skin temperature of the heat-treatable aluminum alloys. They would start to over-age and you'd lose your precipitation hardening. They actually had sensors on the surface that would measure the temperature, and the colder it was up there, at whatever altitude you were, the faster you could go. But you didn't want to destroy your aircraft by overheating the aluminum. The same type of thing — they've just started coming out with aluminum in automotive brakes. The first real problem of trying to use it for calipers — not the drum but the caliper that holds the brake pads — was they would creep. You hit your brakes hard, you get too much temperature, and all of a sudden the caliper holding the brake pads starts to splay out, and you no longer have any pressure on your brakes. It's called brake fade, and it's not a good thing. They fixed some of that.
Student: [inaudible question about Concorde skin friction]
Yeah, air friction on the skin at 40,000 feet. Now you start getting up to 60 and 70,000 feet where the spy planes go, they actually had to use titanium because they couldn't use aluminum. Don't ask me why — I'm not sure I understand why as you get more rarefied you get more friction. Did you know, Sam?
Student: [suggests supersonic shockwave]
Oh yeah, exactly. You get the shockwave effect, you're right. The spy planes were going supersonic, and the Concorde was going supersonic. A Boeing 747 doesn't have to worry about the skin temperature — it's minus 40 up there. It's when you go supersonic. Maybe the spy planes were going Mach 4 rather than Mach 3 or Mach 2. Actually I think the Concorde was about Mach 2 or Mach 2 and a half. I only flew it once. So there are some issues.
§4. MMPDS handbook and the dominance of aluminum in aerospace [13:16]
All these things I told you about how wonderful steel is, and I'll continue to tell you how it dominates the market — here is something you should write down. This is the Federal Aviation Administration Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization, MMPDS-05. It's about an eleven or twelve volume set, about that thick. If you want to buy it, it's a hundred and ten dollars, because the government can't make a profit — it's the cost of printing. If you want to download it, it's free. This used to be known as MIL Handbook 5. It was put together by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Defense, but it's been taken over because the Department of Defense is trying to get out of the standards business. It replaces MIL Handbook 5, which was maintained by the US Air Force, up until 2004. The Defense Department is trying to get out of being the standard writing body for the country, so they turned this over to the Federal Aviation Administration. Actually it's a compilation. If you're the Defense Department, you've got that kind of purchasing power, you can tell Boeing you want some data to go into this handbook, and Boeing wants to give it to you because the FAA is going to define the material properties that you can use to build your aircraft in terms of this handbook.
It says: "This document contains design information on the strength properties of metallic materials elements for aircraft and aerospace vehicle structures." They have two different types of tolerances. The spacecraft tolerance is a much narrower band of strength requirements. Regular grade — I think it's grade B — is a broader band, and that's for most regular aircraft. The scope of the handbook is primarily intended to provide a source of design mechanical and physical properties and joint allowables, so it takes care of welds. Material property and joint data are obtained from tests by material and fastener producers. Anybody the Defense Department buys from, they say, give us your data, we want to put it in the handbook. And you want to give it to them, because what data they put in there they're going to help evaluate, and that's what they're going to say is your design allowable when you design an aircraft. If you want FAA approval for a commercial aircraft, or you want the military to approve, you must use the data in this book.
Student: Why would they let them — isn't that sort of self-regulating, because they're providing the data?
All the aluminum producers are going to do it. The Defense Department and the FAA will evaluate everybody's data, and if there's a big discrepancy they'll say, okay, let's have a little meeting and work this out. And the lowest quality might end up being the one that goes into the book. Because the government can't say, well, Alcoa, you've got a better grade of 7075 aluminum and therefore we're going to require everyone to buy your better grade. The government actually has to go to the lowest common denominator on properties. They've got some regulations they have to worry about.
If you go to one of the books — this is chapter two, the whole book on steels. And why do steels come first? I told you why. This is a wonderful book, graph after graph, it's nothing but graphs of data. This is why you want to have a copy, because it's free. It's not a bad source to look up data. Remember I told you steel was more important economically, as an industry, than aluminum. Two volumes on aluminum, one volume on steel. And the two aluminum volumes are thicker. Why? You make aircraft out of aluminum, not out of steel. Why? Because steel's heavy — another one of its problems. So if you're writing a design manual for aircraft, aluminum's going to be the big gun, not steel. So steel doesn't always win. It loses in corrosion and some other things. Here's magnesium, cute little thing in it. Heat resistant alloys, nickel based super alloys — all your engine materials, not too thick. I believe there's a lot more data on this stuff that is proprietary. And titanium alloys — less than steel, but a fair amount on titanium compared to its market volume, because titanium tends to be used in aircraft. It's worth thinking about whether you want to fill up your computer space with that. If you're going to be in materials you ought to at least know about it.
§5. Copper: conductivity and the trolley wire case [18:47]
Other materials. If you went back and looked at the plot I gave you in the first lecture, structural materials production: steel's one and a half billion tons, aluminum is 45 million tons, copper is 15 million, zinc is 12 million. You can go down to non-metals — at least cement and stone are larger than steel. Plastics as a whole are more than aluminum, but they're nowhere close to the weight of steel. We're going to talk a little bit about why these are where they are.
Copper has some unique properties. One is color — but that's not why we use it most times, sometimes for architectural reasons. What's the number one property of copper that we really like?
Student: Conductivity.
Conductivity — which type of conductivity? Both, that's right, very good. If I take the Amtrak train from Boston to New York — it's an electrical train — it's going to have trolley wire. You go look up and they've got all these ugly towers the whole distance. This is about a 0.545 inch diameter, and it's got a cross section so you can clamp it, and the graphite brushes on top of the train will slide along this thing at 100 miles an hour. So that's trolley wire.
They wanted to make it out of an aluminum ingot that looked like this. I have this stuff because one year on December 22nd I got a phone call saying you have to tell us by Christmas, three days later, whether we can accept six million dollars of this material to go for the New Haven to Boston extension. This is how thick it is. That's all that carries — and it's because it has good electrical conductivity and good corrosion resistance on the surface, better than aluminum. You want electrical conductivity and you're willing to pay a premium. I had all of about 48 hours to figure out whether to accept or reject it. I rejected it, and they had to go buy material from a different supplier. The story is probably in one of my other lectures. In any case, the grain size was too large, because it was too pure. They needed to get some strength, so that copper alloy has two-tenths of a percent silver in it to strengthen it. That makes it even a little pricier. But pure copper is very weak.
It also has very good thermal conductivity. [Tom holds up a tensile specimen.] This is a tensile specimen between molybdenum and copper, and they did a transient liquid phase diffusion bond. I'm sure I talked about this in my joining lecture. Molybdenum will take very high temperatures. If you have a radar system and you want amplified radar — if you're the military trying to fly nap-of-the-earth at sonic velocities, a couple of hundred meters above the surface of the earth, so if you make a mistake you don't have time to make a correction, you have to rely on your radar to keep you from running into a hill — they have some very powerful x-ray machines, and they do that with an electron beam that generates the x-rays. You would melt copper with the heat intensity of that pulsed electron beam, but you won't melt molybdenum. But you need the thermal conductivity of copper, so they make a composite. They braze about two millimeters of molybdenum on the end of a copper piece. The molybdenum takes the heat and the copper carries it away.
Student: What's this striation in the middle?
Oh, that's what we call orange peel. Those are the grains. When we did the tensile test, you're starting to see it deform in the crystal structures, because you have slip on different crystallographic planes. That was a smooth bar when it was machined, but when you start deforming it, each one of the grains deforms at a different rate, and you end up with what they call orange peel because it has the kind of texture of an orange peel.
Student: [asks if it's unique to copper]
No, it's not unique to copper. We see it more in copper alloys, but I've seen aluminum with orange peel. You've got to start with the incorrect grain structure to begin with, and copper tends to give you that. You can get orange peel in steels, but we know how to produce fine grained steels that won't give you that. Very pure coppers will give you large grain size, just like the casting that is going around. The purer the metal, the easier for the grains to grow. Impurities are one of the best ways to suppress grain growth up to a certain extent.
§6. Transmission lines, wildfires, and the rate base [24:30]
So copper has unique electrical and thermal conductivity, and even though it's much more expensive than aluminum and steel we use it. Now, aluminum has sixty percent of the conductivity of copper, and so all those big 345 kilovolt transmission towers — that's aluminum, because you don't want to pay that much for the copper. However, the aluminum tends to get soft. So you actually make a composite. Those are steel cores with aluminum on the outside, and the steel gives you the strength. One of the reasons they're so tall is that when everybody's running their air conditioners during the summer, the wires heat up, and they actually have to make them tall enough so that as they heat up and expand, they don't touch the ground. Because if they touch the ground, they will start a forest fire or a brush fire. Plus it's not very good for the circuit breakers back at the power station. You'd lose your power. Seven or eight years ago they had some tremendous wildfires in San Diego that burned down all that part of southern California.
It turns out some people finally got a big three or four hundred million dollar settlement out of the utility because they claimed that during the summer, when everybody's using the air conditioner, the wires came and touched the ground and started the fire that burned down most of southern California. Whether that's true or not is another question. But the threat of the lawsuit caused the utilities — why would the utility pay hundreds of millions of dollars? We sort of discussed this before. Did I talk about putting things onto the rate base? If they have an expense and they can justify it to the regulators in the state of California or Massachusetts, they just pass the cost on to the consumer. So why not pay off the attorneys? Why need the hassle and all the bad press and going to court? Let's give them hundreds of millions of dollars and then put it on the rate base, let everyone else pay an extra ten bucks a month on their electric bill. So all these people in California — look at the battle they won. They now have higher monthly electric bills for the next ten years. These are externalities that we talked about before.
§7. Titanium, tantalum, and the medical stent [27:14]
Titanium and tantalum have outstanding corrosion resistance. That's one of the reasons titanium's at 165,000 tons. Half of that, or maybe more, is because of its corrosion resistance, not because it's a lightweight high temperature structural material — which it is. About half goes into the aerospace industry, and the other half goes into the corrosion resistance industry — making tubing for heat exchangers and all kinds of things. And it's in the medical business.
[Tom produces a stent and hands it to the class.] It's a little welded titanium wire. They'll fold this thing up, slip it in a tube, bring it in right next to your heart, open it up, let the spring open, and it will catch all those clots that are going to kill you. Just a filter. But it won't corrode in the human body. You try to make that out of stainless steel, it'll be toast.
Student: [inaudible question, possibly about size]
Check out your aorta and figure out how big it is. It's got those little hooks on the end — that's what digs into the wall of the artery. This is an old one from ten or fifteen years ago. Nowadays I'm sure they're more sophisticated, but they had some problem on the welding of the tip, so it came to me. I don't remember what the problem was. In any case, titanium is great for the human body. Tantalum is even better. In most of these things, cost is one of the big drivers.
§8. Structural vs. functional materials across the periodic table [29:15]
This is a very general kind of wrap-up lecture. I've shown you the periodic table before. What elements do I use for structural materials? I use almost all the elements on the periodic table for something. Even technetium, which doesn't exist on earth — not as a structural material, but I do use it in radiology for people getting stress tests in a hospital, even though it's only got a half-life of ten hours. They make it, they fly it in Learjets around the country, and when I had a stress test at Mount Auburn Hospital, they shot me full of technetium, and I was radiating fast enough they could take pictures of my heart pumping while I was running on a treadmill. How exciting. And they learned I'm out of shape.
Even technetium, which doesn't exist on earth, we use. We don't use francium because it's also radioactive and there's not much of it. We don't have a use for it. If we could find a use we probably would make it, like we do with technetium. All the transuranics — plutonium is made in tonnage quantities. Americium is used. Anybody know what it's used for?
Student: Smoke detectors.
Smoke detectors, exactly. It's a little radioactive source that helps ionize the particles, that will set up enough conductivity in the air to tell you you've got smoke in your atmosphere, and it will set off the alarm and wake you up in the middle of the night — or while you're fixing dinner and creating your own smoke particles.
Student: [inaudible — likely about the type of radiation]
Now you're going to have to ask the nuclear engineer. It gives off the right energy. Probably a beta — electron particles. Well, it could be alpha. I don't know if it's a beta emitter or an alpha emitter. Alpha is a helium nucleus, beta emitter is an electron. In the radioactive decay it has the right properties to ionize the air. So they have a very little piece of radioactive material in there, but it happens to be americium for its nuclear properties. I'm not a nuclear engineer so I can't fully answer you. We don't have any nukes in here right now.
Cerium is used in ceramics. Cerium oxide has some interesting properties. All the rest of these are used in functional materials, except neodymium is used in neodymium-iron-boron magnets. Promethium, like technetium, doesn't really exist in any large quantities. [Tom writes on the board.] Structural materials versus functional.
The message I want to give you, the theme for the rest of this morning, is: there are very limited numbers of structural materials we really use. We use almost everything else for some functionality, like americium — that's not a structural use, it's because it has certain nuclear decay properties that are good for ionizing particles in air. Most of these others we don't really use in large quantities for structural materials. Carbon and silicon are the basis of lots of polymers, silicones and hydrocarbons. Aluminum and silicon and magnesium and calcium are used in stone and cement. The metals aluminum, copper, iron — those are the top three in use volume — and then you get down to zinc.
§9. Zinc, the first column, and beryllium toxicity [33:38]
What are the major uses of zinc? Galvanizing. Zinc is mostly used to protect steel. I'll bet eighty percent of that 12 million tons of zinc goes into protecting steel from its problem of corrosion. There are zinc alloys — we call them pot metal castings. Thirty or forty years ago the handles on cars were a zinc die casting. You go to the hardware store, you can find these little cheap metal parts where you want a metal part rather than a plastic part. They're zinc die castings. They don't have a lot of strength, but they're cheap to make. You can make them by die casting, just as cheap as popping out plastic parts, but they're stiffer and stronger. When you need a little more than you can get with plastics, or a little more temperature — not much more temperature — you can use zinc. But most of the zinc is used to protect steel. The major reason we produce zinc is because of the steel industry. It's also used in some aluminum alloys, and in some gold alloys.
If I look at the periodic table, I can wipe out as structural materials the whole first column. Lithium is obviously very important for batteries. Sodium is used in glasses as an alloying element with alumina and silica and magnesia and calcium. But what's one of the problems here in the presence of moisture? What happens to these things if they're metallic? You get a hydroxide, and what's left over from the water molecule? Hydrogen. Have you ever seen anybody drop sodium on water in high school chemistry, and you get a little fire dancing around on the surface of the water? They don't have very good corrosion resistance as metals. They might be used as oxides and chlorides, and they have some fantastic functional material properties as optical materials — sodium chloride or potassium fluoride. But as structural materials, they just don't cut it, because of the lack of corrosion resistance in the atmosphere. Even humidity will do it.
Beryllium is interesting because it's very light — actually has almost the same density as magnesium, very slightly more dense. It has very good high temperature capabilities. But it's extremely expensive because of its toxicity. If you're in the ten percent of the population that has a genetic predisposition to have your lungs react with beryllium, any beryllium compound that gets in your lung — whether it's metallic beryllium or beryllium oxide or beryllium chloride — will grow these nodules in your lungs and you will slowly suffocate. This was all discovered up here on the corner of Mass Ave and Vassar, during the Manhattan Project in World War II. They had a machine shop there. Right now it's a Bank of America kiosk and stuff — at least I'm pretty sure that's where it was. Guys were machining beryllium alloys which were sort of new because the Mechanical Engineering Department came up with this way to vacuum melt metals, and they were able to make beryllium alloys which were very light, and they had some uses for them in the nuclear weapons. They were machining things experimentally here at MIT, and some of these guys in 1944 and 45 started coming down with these health problems. They ended up contaminating the whole building. I've heard the story, I've never confirmed it — it actually eventually just sat there for about ten or twelve years. My thesis advisor told me some of this because he was an undergraduate here in the mid-50s when it was sort of sitting there. They eventually encased it in concrete and carried it and dropped it in Boston Harbor.
Student: What do you mean by nodules?
You start growing little cysts around the beryllium. Your body is trying to encapsulate it. Your body doesn't like beryllium, so it will start reacting and creating little lumps inside your lungs. It is toxic. They didn't know that originally, but now that we can do genetics and DNA tests, only about ten percent of the population has the predisposition. If you go to Brillco [Brush Wellman] and look on their website, they have something that talks about beryllium and it will tell you only about ten percent of people will get it. Unless you have a test, you probably can find out whether you're susceptible. Nonetheless, everybody's afraid of beryllium.
When I was department head, we had a young assistant professor — actually he became Chris Hughes [Schuh's] thesis advisor at Northwestern. He was cleaning out Nick Grant's old lab on the third floor of building eight. He found a little plastic bottle that said "Be" on it. He came rushing into my office: I found powdered beryllium. I said, okay, and I picked it up. Oh, you touched it, you touched the bottle. I said, I'm just like David — I'm not drinking it, I'm not breathing it, it's just in the bottle, I'm picking up the bottle. He just saw "Be" on the bottle and thought he'd come across a nuclear weapon. We had to call Environmental Health Services to dispose of it. I'm sure Nick Grant probably had that since 1945 and it had been sitting in the cabinet, and when he finally retired we were clearing out the cabinet — there were a lot of other things in there too. I had to calm down the assistant professor.
I already told you about beryllium tools. I can take copper and beryllium and make something as hard as hardened steel — 180 ksi. I can make tools that don't spark, because copper has very good thermal conductivity, and beryllium is the only thing on the periodic table that can do that to copper. If we had anything else, do you think we'd be using beryllium at the price of beryllium? Beryllium is unique in those properties.
§10. Scandium, baseball bats, and the trampoline effect [40:31]
Scandium, yttrium, and lanthanum are all interesting for ceramics, for functional materials. In some of the ceramics — like yttrium-stabilized zirconia — it can be a structural material. Scandium does go into metals. If you look at my little chart, scandium is at two thousand tons a year. Anybody know what scandium is used for in alloying? Aluminum, right. Anybody know what the highest strength aluminum alloys are, and they're not used for aerospace? 100 ksi strength. Baseball bats.
If you want to hit home runs, you need to match the stiffness of the bat to the stiffness of the baseball or the softball. Since aluminum's got this high modulus and the cork and twine and horsehide has a low modulus, the way to do that is — this is solid, the bat has to be very thin wall, so you get the springiness of a trampoline effect. In fact they call it the trampoline effect. One of you was talking about composite materials for a sport — pole vaulting. Someone else, maybe she's not here, had a sport — I think it was lacrosse. And they're now going to composite baseball bats, she tells me.
A couple years ago when I was looking at this, they were still mostly aluminum. You can dial in the properties, but the way they get 100 ksi is they add scandium. Scandi-malloy, says right there. What does that mean to most of the little leaguers? Not much. Scandium alloy — they don't even know what an alloy is, much less scandium. But scandium can give you extremely fine grain size that's extruded as a tube, and as you extrude it you're quenching it at the same time, so you do your heat treatment as part of your extrusion. It's just like squirting out toothpaste. You can get tremendously fine grain size and tremendously rapid heating and cooling, and therefore you can get 100 ksi strengths. Alcoa has made a number of specialty alloys that they sell to the baseball manufacturers. It's a huge industry — I had no idea how big that industry was. They're up to about 105 ksi now, but they're getting so thin in the wall that some of these things you can take about one good hit before you start getting cracks in your bat. Who wants to pay 150 dollars for a bat and use it once?
Student: Copper cables for the trolleys and transmissions you mentioned — they add silver impurity sometimes to add strength. Is this the same situation? What's the mechanism?
This actually helps with the precipitation hardening and the grain size. You can use titanium, but it's not as good. The Soviets really developed the scandium addition. If you really want to get the best — sports materials actually often leads in a lot of other things, because, as I always say, you can sell anything to a golfer. High end of their earning capacity, old men who want to be able to brag against the other CEOs on the golf course. They'll pay anything — they'll pay ten thousand dollars for something that's hardly worth it. It's all pride. They were making metallic woods — golf heads — and they would get about six shots before they would all crack.
So what is the mechanism? It goes to the grain boundaries and gives grain boundary drag. If you don't have impurities, the grains will just grow by a diffusional mechanism. If you have impurities there, you get what's called grain boundary drag. You want something that's surface active on the grain boundaries and gets caught. It's sort of like precipitation — precipitates will do the same thing, but even individual atoms will do it too. It's called grain boundary drag.
§11. Zirconium, manganese, and the sea nodules [45:29]
Titanium, zirconium, and hafnium. Titanium we already know about. Zirconium is a structural material in a very special application. Anybody know what? [Tom holds up a sample.] This is crystal bar zirconium. You can tell it's fairly heavy. It's made by reducing zirconium tetrachloride on a hot wire of zirconium, and it just grows from the vapor phase. This is a Zircaloy alloy tube — nuclear reactor fuel cladding. Very low nuclear cross-section. Those little neutrons go right through it. So it won't poison the reaction. If you know anything about nuclear reactors, one of the ways you poison the reactor is you put boron in there — you have borated water. Boron absorbs neutrons like gangbusters, and so you can poison the reaction and shut it down. If you have something like Three Mile Island and you want to shut it down, you dump borated water on top of the reaction to poison it and stop it. Zirconium has very low nuclear cross-section, which means it's transparent to neutrons. It has to be very pure, because a little bit of hafnium impurity poisons it — hafnium starts absorbing neutrons at very low concentrations.
Vanadium — I only know of one vanadium alloy used in a very specialized oil field application for corrosion resistance. Niobium and vanadium — their major use, hundreds of thousands of tons, is as alloying elements in steel. Most of these other things on the periodic table, we use them just like zinc — they're alloying elements in steel. I've got one and a half billion tons of steel, and if I only put one percent nickel in all that steel I would use more than all the nickel in the world. We do like nickel in steel — we'd love to have nickel in steel, but it's too expensive to put very much in. Cobalt is even more expensive than nickel, but it makes good high temperature alloys. Nickel is the base of all our super alloys. Manganese — about the only thing we use it for — we have huge blast furnaces that turn out half a million tons of manganese a year, because most steels have about one percent manganese in them. One and a half billion tons of steel means 15 million tons of manganese a year.
[Tom produces a manganese sea nodule.] Back around 1975, some companies like Kennecott Copper were big on this. In the Atlantic Ocean near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, if you go down about 6000 feet, you will find the floor is loaded with billions of tons of that. It's extremely rich in copper, which is why Kennecott Copper was interested in it. If you want to see a cross section, if you go to the Infinite Corridor, you'll see one — it has lots of nickel and copper, but it's mostly manganese. You could throw that straight into a furnace and start refining the metal. The only problem is, it's six thousand feet deep. They were looking at mining it in the 70s, because they're scattered all over the seabed, including off the coast of California. I got that from Professor Clark, who got it at some open house at MIT in the mid-70s.
Nick Grant at the time wanted to start a whole manganese metallurgy just like steel, which manganese economically could compete with, if you had rich ores like that and they weren't so difficult to get — being at the bottom of the ocean. If you had ores as rich as some of our iron ores from manganese, economically it's made by the same process as steel — put carbon in a blast furnace with manganese oxide and you get manganese metal out, manganese carbide, manganese-carbon alloy out, just like making cast iron.
Student: [asks about how the nodules formed]
They were formed by some geological process — these vents in the middle of the North Atlantic Ridge. They're just sitting there on the bottom. You have spewing up of minerals into the water from the vents, and somehow they're nucleating and growing, sort of like hail falling onto the surface of the ocean. But it's kind of deep. If it weren't so deep — if you could drain the ocean — you'd have an excellent source.
§12. Precious metals, the rest of the table, and closing [50:31]
All the 3000 series aluminum alloys are aluminum-manganese alloys. Can stock — one percent manganese. So manganese is used as an alloying element. One of the reasons — manganese is allotropic like iron has alpha and gamma, BCC and FCC. Manganese is almost as bad as plutonium — they've got like five or six different crystal structures. Talk about complex metallurgy. This thing's transforming all kinds of ways, and when you start alloying with it you get rid of one phase and start another phase — it's just a mess. Very few people really publish in the open literature on plutonium, but there's been a lot of good metallurgy done on plutonium. It's just not very public.
Most of the rest of these — cobalt — tend to be alloying elements in other things. These are the light metals over here — cadmium, indium, mercury — they melt at low temperatures. Here your precious metals. One of the only precious metals we use in fairly high volume is for turbine blades. [Tom holds up a turbine blade.] This is actually for growth of a single crystal turbine blade that's six percent rhenium. It's about forty dollars an ounce. For the turbine blades in the engines that you fly in airplanes, that alloy, in order to get high temperature properties, has rhenium. They'd love to use platinum, but it's a lot pricier than rhenium. Rhenium is over here on the periodic table close to tungsten. Silver and gold are mostly used in jewelry and pride metals. Palladium and platinum are used as catalysts — that's functional material. Rhodium is used as a catalyst, iridium is used as a catalyst.
When you start looking at the periodic table — these are not structural, these are gases, these are low melting, these are mostly alloying elements with iron or copper or aluminum. These are useless as structural materials. These can only be used in an oxidized state — like a chloride or an oxide. You can use them, but they have corrosion problems just like the others. When you look at the periodic table, we don't have a lot of choices. When you add economics on top of it, we really only have a handful or two handfuls of choices, which most people don't realize. They're always hearing about the functional properties of these other elements — oh, we used erbium to make a beautiful red color phosphor in one of our display screens. Fine, and you'll sell a couple of pounds of that a year, because you're using it in parts per million quantities. Talking structural materials, we're talking very large volumes — tons, millions of tons of material. And there are just not very many choices.
If you have questions about your presentations, you can come see me. I will be around every day but Friday of next week, and I'll be here tomorrow. Thanks, and don't forget to watch your other module at some point.