SMS_F2014_13

Structural Materials Selection Fall 2014 Session · 12 sections 19 cases · Watch on YouTube ↗ all files
Layer 3 — readable edition

§1. Alcoa as an integrated monopoly [00:00]

§1.p1

I was looking for this slide the other day. This is the Alcoa book called From Monopoly to Competition. It wasn't written by Alcoa — it's written by someone in the media, and he interviewed lots of people from Alcoa. Most books written about companies are written by the companies, paid for by the companies, sort of biased. This guy actually goes through and says a lot of things. I showed you the picture of the nice beautiful Pittsburgh Reduction Company and then the real picture. Alcoa wouldn't put that in if they had paid for the book.

§1.p2

On the eve of World War II, Alcoa had a monopoly in bauxite — which is the raw material for the Hall cell — and alumina, which is an even purer material, and making pure aluminum. Alcoa owned the business in the United States; they were the only ones in the business. Fabricated aluminum products: on average, foil was only fifty percent. Who was the other big foil producer in aluminum? Reynolds. And why did Reynolds go into the foil business? Reynolds is part of Reynolds Tobacco — or was part of Reynolds Tobacco — the Reynolds family of Richmond, Virginia. They needed something to wrap their cigarettes in, and they decided we use enough foil we might as well start our own aluminum foil business. So Reynolds Aluminum is a spin-off of Reynolds Tobacco.

§1.p3

That's why Alcoa only had fifty percent. It turns out the only three aluminum companies of note were Alcoa, Kaiser, and Reynolds was very specialized at that time. They've grown in what they do. Alcoa was a pretty well integrated monopoly. Remember there were other integrated monopolies: Henry Ford making automobiles, he had his own steel plant, he had his own glass plant. Alcoa had their own hydroelectric plants. They built big dams. Anybody from eastern Tennessee? There's a town right near Knoxville called Alcoa. You fly into the airport for Knoxville, you'll be flying into Alcoa, Tennessee. Alcoa built hydroelectric plants in the Smoky Mountains. They started out at Niagara Falls back in the 1890s, because that's where you get your electricity. By 1910 they were going to other places where they had wild rivers and building dams and building big Hall cell plants. Alcoa still has a plant in Alcoa, Tennessee.


§2. Course schedule and themes from Tuesday [03:00]

§2.p1

That brings us up to time. Any questions from people who just showed up? Okay. The schedule: Dr. Belmar will do Friday and Tuesday, Monday's a holiday, we'll start presentations on Wednesday and Thursday. The reason I wanted to get things started is because things come up, and it looks like next Friday I've got to be in Houston. So the people who are listed here for Friday — I'll have Jerry send this around, we still have some people to sign up. It looks like we are going to run into November 3rd if I have to cancel next Friday's presentations. Hopefully I won't have to cancel too many. All the other days are good. I didn't put down the 30th and 31st because I have to be in Houston on those days. We handed this out so most people should have an idea of what the schedule is.

§2.p2

The themes from Tuesday: the brittleness of glass, which makes it unfit as a structural material in general, is overcome by surface modification. You can encapsulate — that's called fiberglass. You can use thermal processes — that's called tempered glass. You can use chemical processes — that's called ion exchange, where you substitute the sodium atoms with potassium atoms. Or if you really want to get a lot, you can make a lithiated glass and substitute lithium with potassium and you get an even bigger difference.

§2.p3

So glass is a structural material. Whatever the rule is, there's usually exceptions to the rule. If I tell you the rule is you need fracture toughness to be a structural material, that's absolutely true, and that's an important thing. But glass has certain properties — it's transparent, and we like that for certain applications, and there's not a lot of other choices other than plastic, which doesn't have a lot of strength. Glass also can give you fantastic strength. Those fibers when they're freshly made can give you a half million psi. If you test them within minutes of forming the fiber, you can get 2 million psi on glass fibers. But within hours it's down to only half a million. That's still pretty good, it's just as good as Kevlar fiber. So you can make fiberglass, and we make boats out of fiberglass, and we've been doing it for years, because glass has very good strength, has terrible toughness, but we can get around that. You get the toughness by basically making a composite. And you can do thermal treatments to temper the glass so that it doesn't shatter with terrible shards that are going to kill people. You can do chemical tempering if you really want to spend some money. Thermal tempering takes a couple of minutes; chemical tempering takes hours, like three or four hours. So chemical tempered glass is not used as often, it's pricier, but it gives you a much thicker layer of protection. The chemical tempering gives you excellent properties of maybe 40 or 50 microns, and thermal depends on the thickness of the glass and it can also be a few microns as well. You've basically got to get rid of those scratches on the glass that go a tenth of a micron deep. Those are harmful. So that's glass.


§3. Stainless steel and the heat-treatable aluminum problem [07:02]

§3.p1

Since it's the last day I've got to cover the rest of the periodic table of structural materials. We've done most of the aluminum. The other theme from the other day is aluminum was a monopoly from 1890 to 1945. I told you that one of the Achilles heels of steel is corrosion. Steel rusts and we do all kinds of things to protect against that. The Swedes around 1907 added chromium to steel at more than ten percent and came up with stainless steel. We use a significant amount of stainless steel — about two to five percent of a typical steel industry is going to be in stainless. So in the United States, if we use 100 million tons of steel a year we might use between two and five million tons of stainless. There are five general types: ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, duplex, and precipitation hardening. The big one is austenitic — that's 304 or 18-8 stainless steel. There's a whole genealogy chart of this. We don't have time to go through all of these.

§3.p2

But there are problems with stainless steels. My experience is, although stainless steels are two percent of all steels, which makes them about two percent of all metals, they constitute thirty percent of all the problems and failures. That's because everybody figures, oh, it's stainless. A lot of people read some things and they say it's stainless — it's not stain free. About once or twice a year, someone will bring me a piece of something and say, this was supposed to be stainless steel, it's all rusty so it can't be stainless, someone gave me the wrong material. I say, no, that's stainless. You get rid of that protective chromium oxide skin and it will rust, just like regular steel.

§3.p3

Now aluminum is the second most widely used metal. Two percent of steel — about 20 million tons a year. But it's five times the cost of steel. Historically aluminum was more precious than gold, and a significant fraction — like forty percent of all aluminum used to go into can stock, beverage containers. That's a sweet spot for the aluminum industry. There are a lot of different alloy series. There are heat treatable and wrought alloys. The wrought alloys are things like the 3000 series, which is can stock, and the 5000 series, which is aluminum-magnesium alloys. It's not heat treatable, but you can weld it and get essentially full strength. So if you're the US Navy and you're trying to build an aluminum ship that's lightweight, you're going to have to weld it, so you make it out of 5000 series. The aerospace industry likes to use heat treatable because they're going to rivet it, they don't have to weld it. Instead of getting 25 or 30 ksi in the wrought material — although they've got some wrought materials up in the 40 ksi that are a little bit stronger than the lowest strength steels — you can get 75 ksi heat treatable.

§3.p4

The problem with the heat treatable is they can start to degrade at fairly low temperatures. The supersonic transport Concorde was not limited on speed; it was limited on the skin temperature of the heat-treatable aluminum alloys. They would start to over-age and you'd lose your precipitation hardening. They actually had sensors on the surface that would measure the temperature, and the colder it was up there, at whatever altitude you were, the faster you could go. But you didn't want to destroy your aircraft by overheating the aluminum. The same type of thing — they've just started coming out with aluminum in automotive brakes. The first real problem of trying to use it for calipers — not the drum but the caliper that holds the brake pads — was they would creep. You hit your brakes hard, you get too much temperature, and all of a sudden the caliper holding the brake pads starts to splay out, and you no longer have any pressure on your brakes. It's called brake fade, and it's not a good thing. They fixed some of that.

§3.p5

Student: [inaudible question about Concorde skin friction]

§3.p6

Yeah, air friction on the skin at 40,000 feet. Now you start getting up to 60 and 70,000 feet where the spy planes go, they actually had to use titanium because they couldn't use aluminum. Don't ask me why — I'm not sure I understand why as you get more rarefied you get more friction. Did you know, Sam?

§3.p7

Student: [suggests supersonic shockwave]

§3.p8

Oh yeah, exactly. You get the shockwave effect, you're right. The spy planes were going supersonic, and the Concorde was going supersonic. A Boeing 747 doesn't have to worry about the skin temperature — it's minus 40 up there. It's when you go supersonic. Maybe the spy planes were going Mach 4 rather than Mach 3 or Mach 2. Actually I think the Concorde was about Mach 2 or Mach 2 and a half. I only flew it once. So there are some issues.


§4. MMPDS handbook and the dominance of aluminum in aerospace [13:16]

§4.p1

All these things I told you about how wonderful steel is, and I'll continue to tell you how it dominates the market — here is something you should write down. This is the Federal Aviation Administration Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization, MMPDS-05. It's about an eleven or twelve volume set, about that thick. If you want to buy it, it's a hundred and ten dollars, because the government can't make a profit — it's the cost of printing. If you want to download it, it's free. This used to be known as MIL Handbook 5. It was put together by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Defense, but it's been taken over because the Department of Defense is trying to get out of the standards business. It replaces MIL Handbook 5, which was maintained by the US Air Force, up until 2004. The Defense Department is trying to get out of being the standard writing body for the country, so they turned this over to the Federal Aviation Administration. Actually it's a compilation. If you're the Defense Department, you've got that kind of purchasing power, you can tell Boeing you want some data to go into this handbook, and Boeing wants to give it to you because the FAA is going to define the material properties that you can use to build your aircraft in terms of this handbook.

§4.p2

It says: "This document contains design information on the strength properties of metallic materials elements for aircraft and aerospace vehicle structures." They have two different types of tolerances. The spacecraft tolerance is a much narrower band of strength requirements. Regular grade — I think it's grade B — is a broader band, and that's for most regular aircraft. The scope of the handbook is primarily intended to provide a source of design mechanical and physical properties and joint allowables, so it takes care of welds. Material property and joint data are obtained from tests by material and fastener producers. Anybody the Defense Department buys from, they say, give us your data, we want to put it in the handbook. And you want to give it to them, because what data they put in there they're going to help evaluate, and that's what they're going to say is your design allowable when you design an aircraft. If you want FAA approval for a commercial aircraft, or you want the military to approve, you must use the data in this book.

§4.p3

Student: Why would they let them — isn't that sort of self-regulating, because they're providing the data?

§4.p4

All the aluminum producers are going to do it. The Defense Department and the FAA will evaluate everybody's data, and if there's a big discrepancy they'll say, okay, let's have a little meeting and work this out. And the lowest quality might end up being the one that goes into the book. Because the government can't say, well, Alcoa, you've got a better grade of 7075 aluminum and therefore we're going to require everyone to buy your better grade. The government actually has to go to the lowest common denominator on properties. They've got some regulations they have to worry about.

§4.p5

If you go to one of the books — this is chapter two, the whole book on steels. And why do steels come first? I told you why. This is a wonderful book, graph after graph, it's nothing but graphs of data. This is why you want to have a copy, because it's free. It's not a bad source to look up data. Remember I told you steel was more important economically, as an industry, than aluminum. Two volumes on aluminum, one volume on steel. And the two aluminum volumes are thicker. Why? You make aircraft out of aluminum, not out of steel. Why? Because steel's heavy — another one of its problems. So if you're writing a design manual for aircraft, aluminum's going to be the big gun, not steel. So steel doesn't always win. It loses in corrosion and some other things. Here's magnesium, cute little thing in it. Heat resistant alloys, nickel based super alloys — all your engine materials, not too thick. I believe there's a lot more data on this stuff that is proprietary. And titanium alloys — less than steel, but a fair amount on titanium compared to its market volume, because titanium tends to be used in aircraft. It's worth thinking about whether you want to fill up your computer space with that. If you're going to be in materials you ought to at least know about it.


§5. Copper: conductivity and the trolley wire case [18:47]

§5.p1

Other materials. If you went back and looked at the plot I gave you in the first lecture, structural materials production: steel's one and a half billion tons, aluminum is 45 million tons, copper is 15 million, zinc is 12 million. You can go down to non-metals — at least cement and stone are larger than steel. Plastics as a whole are more than aluminum, but they're nowhere close to the weight of steel. We're going to talk a little bit about why these are where they are.

§5.p2

Copper has some unique properties. One is color — but that's not why we use it most times, sometimes for architectural reasons. What's the number one property of copper that we really like?

§5.p3

Student: Conductivity.

§5.p4

Conductivity — which type of conductivity? Both, that's right, very good. If I take the Amtrak train from Boston to New York — it's an electrical train — it's going to have trolley wire. You go look up and they've got all these ugly towers the whole distance. This is about a 0.545 inch diameter, and it's got a cross section so you can clamp it, and the graphite brushes on top of the train will slide along this thing at 100 miles an hour. So that's trolley wire.

§5.p5

They wanted to make it out of an aluminum ingot that looked like this. I have this stuff because one year on December 22nd I got a phone call saying you have to tell us by Christmas, three days later, whether we can accept six million dollars of this material to go for the New Haven to Boston extension. This is how thick it is. That's all that carries — and it's because it has good electrical conductivity and good corrosion resistance on the surface, better than aluminum. You want electrical conductivity and you're willing to pay a premium. I had all of about 48 hours to figure out whether to accept or reject it. I rejected it, and they had to go buy material from a different supplier. The story is probably in one of my other lectures. In any case, the grain size was too large, because it was too pure. They needed to get some strength, so that copper alloy has two-tenths of a percent silver in it to strengthen it. That makes it even a little pricier. But pure copper is very weak.

§5.p6

It also has very good thermal conductivity. [Tom holds up a tensile specimen.] This is a tensile specimen between molybdenum and copper, and they did a transient liquid phase diffusion bond. I'm sure I talked about this in my joining lecture. Molybdenum will take very high temperatures. If you have a radar system and you want amplified radar — if you're the military trying to fly nap-of-the-earth at sonic velocities, a couple of hundred meters above the surface of the earth, so if you make a mistake you don't have time to make a correction, you have to rely on your radar to keep you from running into a hill — they have some very powerful x-ray machines, and they do that with an electron beam that generates the x-rays. You would melt copper with the heat intensity of that pulsed electron beam, but you won't melt molybdenum. But you need the thermal conductivity of copper, so they make a composite. They braze about two millimeters of molybdenum on the end of a copper piece. The molybdenum takes the heat and the copper carries it away.

§5.p7

Student: What's this striation in the middle?

§5.p8

Oh, that's what we call orange peel. Those are the grains. When we did the tensile test, you're starting to see it deform in the crystal structures, because you have slip on different crystallographic planes. That was a smooth bar when it was machined, but when you start deforming it, each one of the grains deforms at a different rate, and you end up with what they call orange peel because it has the kind of texture of an orange peel.

§5.p9

Student: [asks if it's unique to copper]

§5.p10

No, it's not unique to copper. We see it more in copper alloys, but I've seen aluminum with orange peel. You've got to start with the incorrect grain structure to begin with, and copper tends to give you that. You can get orange peel in steels, but we know how to produce fine grained steels that won't give you that. Very pure coppers will give you large grain size, just like the casting that is going around. The purer the metal, the easier for the grains to grow. Impurities are one of the best ways to suppress grain growth up to a certain extent.


§6. Transmission lines, wildfires, and the rate base [24:30]

§6.p1

So copper has unique electrical and thermal conductivity, and even though it's much more expensive than aluminum and steel we use it. Now, aluminum has sixty percent of the conductivity of copper, and so all those big 345 kilovolt transmission towers — that's aluminum, because you don't want to pay that much for the copper. However, the aluminum tends to get soft. So you actually make a composite. Those are steel cores with aluminum on the outside, and the steel gives you the strength. One of the reasons they're so tall is that when everybody's running their air conditioners during the summer, the wires heat up, and they actually have to make them tall enough so that as they heat up and expand, they don't touch the ground. Because if they touch the ground, they will start a forest fire or a brush fire. Plus it's not very good for the circuit breakers back at the power station. You'd lose your power. Seven or eight years ago they had some tremendous wildfires in San Diego that burned down all that part of southern California.

§6.p2

It turns out some people finally got a big three or four hundred million dollar settlement out of the utility because they claimed that during the summer, when everybody's using the air conditioner, the wires came and touched the ground and started the fire that burned down most of southern California. Whether that's true or not is another question. But the threat of the lawsuit caused the utilities — why would the utility pay hundreds of millions of dollars? We sort of discussed this before. Did I talk about putting things onto the rate base? If they have an expense and they can justify it to the regulators in the state of California or Massachusetts, they just pass the cost on to the consumer. So why not pay off the attorneys? Why need the hassle and all the bad press and going to court? Let's give them hundreds of millions of dollars and then put it on the rate base, let everyone else pay an extra ten bucks a month on their electric bill. So all these people in California — look at the battle they won. They now have higher monthly electric bills for the next ten years. These are externalities that we talked about before.


§7. Titanium, tantalum, and the medical stent [27:14]

§7.p1

Titanium and tantalum have outstanding corrosion resistance. That's one of the reasons titanium's at 165,000 tons. Half of that, or maybe more, is because of its corrosion resistance, not because it's a lightweight high temperature structural material — which it is. About half goes into the aerospace industry, and the other half goes into the corrosion resistance industry — making tubing for heat exchangers and all kinds of things. And it's in the medical business.

§7.p2

[Tom produces a stent and hands it to the class.] It's a little welded titanium wire. They'll fold this thing up, slip it in a tube, bring it in right next to your heart, open it up, let the spring open, and it will catch all those clots that are going to kill you. Just a filter. But it won't corrode in the human body. You try to make that out of stainless steel, it'll be toast.

§7.p3

Student: [inaudible question, possibly about size]

§7.p4

Check out your aorta and figure out how big it is. It's got those little hooks on the end — that's what digs into the wall of the artery. This is an old one from ten or fifteen years ago. Nowadays I'm sure they're more sophisticated, but they had some problem on the welding of the tip, so it came to me. I don't remember what the problem was. In any case, titanium is great for the human body. Tantalum is even better. In most of these things, cost is one of the big drivers.


§8. Structural vs. functional materials across the periodic table [29:15]

§8.p1

This is a very general kind of wrap-up lecture. I've shown you the periodic table before. What elements do I use for structural materials? I use almost all the elements on the periodic table for something. Even technetium, which doesn't exist on earth — not as a structural material, but I do use it in radiology for people getting stress tests in a hospital, even though it's only got a half-life of ten hours. They make it, they fly it in Learjets around the country, and when I had a stress test at Mount Auburn Hospital, they shot me full of technetium, and I was radiating fast enough they could take pictures of my heart pumping while I was running on a treadmill. How exciting. And they learned I'm out of shape.

§8.p2

Even technetium, which doesn't exist on earth, we use. We don't use francium because it's also radioactive and there's not much of it. We don't have a use for it. If we could find a use we probably would make it, like we do with technetium. All the transuranics — plutonium is made in tonnage quantities. Americium is used. Anybody know what it's used for?

§8.p3

Student: Smoke detectors.

§8.p4

Smoke detectors, exactly. It's a little radioactive source that helps ionize the particles, that will set up enough conductivity in the air to tell you you've got smoke in your atmosphere, and it will set off the alarm and wake you up in the middle of the night — or while you're fixing dinner and creating your own smoke particles.

§8.p5

Student: [inaudible — likely about the type of radiation]

§8.p6

Now you're going to have to ask the nuclear engineer. It gives off the right energy. Probably a beta — electron particles. Well, it could be alpha. I don't know if it's a beta emitter or an alpha emitter. Alpha is a helium nucleus, beta emitter is an electron. In the radioactive decay it has the right properties to ionize the air. So they have a very little piece of radioactive material in there, but it happens to be americium for its nuclear properties. I'm not a nuclear engineer so I can't fully answer you. We don't have any nukes in here right now.

§8.p7

Cerium is used in ceramics. Cerium oxide has some interesting properties. All the rest of these are used in functional materials, except neodymium is used in neodymium-iron-boron magnets. Promethium, like technetium, doesn't really exist in any large quantities. [Tom writes on the board.] Structural materials versus functional.

§8.p8

The message I want to give you, the theme for the rest of this morning, is: there are very limited numbers of structural materials we really use. We use almost everything else for some functionality, like americium — that's not a structural use, it's because it has certain nuclear decay properties that are good for ionizing particles in air. Most of these others we don't really use in large quantities for structural materials. Carbon and silicon are the basis of lots of polymers, silicones and hydrocarbons. Aluminum and silicon and magnesium and calcium are used in stone and cement. The metals aluminum, copper, iron — those are the top three in use volume — and then you get down to zinc.


§9. Zinc, the first column, and beryllium toxicity [33:38]

§9.p1

What are the major uses of zinc? Galvanizing. Zinc is mostly used to protect steel. I'll bet eighty percent of that 12 million tons of zinc goes into protecting steel from its problem of corrosion. There are zinc alloys — we call them pot metal castings. Thirty or forty years ago the handles on cars were a zinc die casting. You go to the hardware store, you can find these little cheap metal parts where you want a metal part rather than a plastic part. They're zinc die castings. They don't have a lot of strength, but they're cheap to make. You can make them by die casting, just as cheap as popping out plastic parts, but they're stiffer and stronger. When you need a little more than you can get with plastics, or a little more temperature — not much more temperature — you can use zinc. But most of the zinc is used to protect steel. The major reason we produce zinc is because of the steel industry. It's also used in some aluminum alloys, and in some gold alloys.

§9.p2

If I look at the periodic table, I can wipe out as structural materials the whole first column. Lithium is obviously very important for batteries. Sodium is used in glasses as an alloying element with alumina and silica and magnesia and calcium. But what's one of the problems here in the presence of moisture? What happens to these things if they're metallic? You get a hydroxide, and what's left over from the water molecule? Hydrogen. Have you ever seen anybody drop sodium on water in high school chemistry, and you get a little fire dancing around on the surface of the water? They don't have very good corrosion resistance as metals. They might be used as oxides and chlorides, and they have some fantastic functional material properties as optical materials — sodium chloride or potassium fluoride. But as structural materials, they just don't cut it, because of the lack of corrosion resistance in the atmosphere. Even humidity will do it.

§9.p3

Beryllium is interesting because it's very light — actually has almost the same density as magnesium, very slightly more dense. It has very good high temperature capabilities. But it's extremely expensive because of its toxicity. If you're in the ten percent of the population that has a genetic predisposition to have your lungs react with beryllium, any beryllium compound that gets in your lung — whether it's metallic beryllium or beryllium oxide or beryllium chloride — will grow these nodules in your lungs and you will slowly suffocate. This was all discovered up here on the corner of Mass Ave and Vassar, during the Manhattan Project in World War II. They had a machine shop there. Right now it's a Bank of America kiosk and stuff — at least I'm pretty sure that's where it was. Guys were machining beryllium alloys which were sort of new because the Mechanical Engineering Department came up with this way to vacuum melt metals, and they were able to make beryllium alloys which were very light, and they had some uses for them in the nuclear weapons. They were machining things experimentally here at MIT, and some of these guys in 1944 and 45 started coming down with these health problems. They ended up contaminating the whole building. I've heard the story, I've never confirmed it — it actually eventually just sat there for about ten or twelve years. My thesis advisor told me some of this because he was an undergraduate here in the mid-50s when it was sort of sitting there. They eventually encased it in concrete and carried it and dropped it in Boston Harbor.

§9.p4

Student: What do you mean by nodules?

§9.p5

You start growing little cysts around the beryllium. Your body is trying to encapsulate it. Your body doesn't like beryllium, so it will start reacting and creating little lumps inside your lungs. It is toxic. They didn't know that originally, but now that we can do genetics and DNA tests, only about ten percent of the population has the predisposition. If you go to Brillco [Brush Wellman] and look on their website, they have something that talks about beryllium and it will tell you only about ten percent of people will get it. Unless you have a test, you probably can find out whether you're susceptible. Nonetheless, everybody's afraid of beryllium.

§9.p6

When I was department head, we had a young assistant professor — actually he became Chris Hughes [Schuh's] thesis advisor at Northwestern. He was cleaning out Nick Grant's old lab on the third floor of building eight. He found a little plastic bottle that said "Be" on it. He came rushing into my office: I found powdered beryllium. I said, okay, and I picked it up. Oh, you touched it, you touched the bottle. I said, I'm just like David — I'm not drinking it, I'm not breathing it, it's just in the bottle, I'm picking up the bottle. He just saw "Be" on the bottle and thought he'd come across a nuclear weapon. We had to call Environmental Health Services to dispose of it. I'm sure Nick Grant probably had that since 1945 and it had been sitting in the cabinet, and when he finally retired we were clearing out the cabinet — there were a lot of other things in there too. I had to calm down the assistant professor.

§9.p7

I already told you about beryllium tools. I can take copper and beryllium and make something as hard as hardened steel — 180 ksi. I can make tools that don't spark, because copper has very good thermal conductivity, and beryllium is the only thing on the periodic table that can do that to copper. If we had anything else, do you think we'd be using beryllium at the price of beryllium? Beryllium is unique in those properties.


§10. Scandium, baseball bats, and the trampoline effect [40:31]

§10.p1

Scandium, yttrium, and lanthanum are all interesting for ceramics, for functional materials. In some of the ceramics — like yttrium-stabilized zirconia — it can be a structural material. Scandium does go into metals. If you look at my little chart, scandium is at two thousand tons a year. Anybody know what scandium is used for in alloying? Aluminum, right. Anybody know what the highest strength aluminum alloys are, and they're not used for aerospace? 100 ksi strength. Baseball bats.

§10.p2

If you want to hit home runs, you need to match the stiffness of the bat to the stiffness of the baseball or the softball. Since aluminum's got this high modulus and the cork and twine and horsehide has a low modulus, the way to do that is — this is solid, the bat has to be very thin wall, so you get the springiness of a trampoline effect. In fact they call it the trampoline effect. One of you was talking about composite materials for a sport — pole vaulting. Someone else, maybe she's not here, had a sport — I think it was lacrosse. And they're now going to composite baseball bats, she tells me.

§10.p3

A couple years ago when I was looking at this, they were still mostly aluminum. You can dial in the properties, but the way they get 100 ksi is they add scandium. Scandi-malloy, says right there. What does that mean to most of the little leaguers? Not much. Scandium alloy — they don't even know what an alloy is, much less scandium. But scandium can give you extremely fine grain size that's extruded as a tube, and as you extrude it you're quenching it at the same time, so you do your heat treatment as part of your extrusion. It's just like squirting out toothpaste. You can get tremendously fine grain size and tremendously rapid heating and cooling, and therefore you can get 100 ksi strengths. Alcoa has made a number of specialty alloys that they sell to the baseball manufacturers. It's a huge industry — I had no idea how big that industry was. They're up to about 105 ksi now, but they're getting so thin in the wall that some of these things you can take about one good hit before you start getting cracks in your bat. Who wants to pay 150 dollars for a bat and use it once?

§10.p4

Student: Copper cables for the trolleys and transmissions you mentioned — they add silver impurity sometimes to add strength. Is this the same situation? What's the mechanism?

§10.p5

This actually helps with the precipitation hardening and the grain size. You can use titanium, but it's not as good. The Soviets really developed the scandium addition. If you really want to get the best — sports materials actually often leads in a lot of other things, because, as I always say, you can sell anything to a golfer. High end of their earning capacity, old men who want to be able to brag against the other CEOs on the golf course. They'll pay anything — they'll pay ten thousand dollars for something that's hardly worth it. It's all pride. They were making metallic woods — golf heads — and they would get about six shots before they would all crack.

§10.p6

So what is the mechanism? It goes to the grain boundaries and gives grain boundary drag. If you don't have impurities, the grains will just grow by a diffusional mechanism. If you have impurities there, you get what's called grain boundary drag. You want something that's surface active on the grain boundaries and gets caught. It's sort of like precipitation — precipitates will do the same thing, but even individual atoms will do it too. It's called grain boundary drag.


§11. Zirconium, manganese, and the sea nodules [45:29]

§11.p1

Titanium, zirconium, and hafnium. Titanium we already know about. Zirconium is a structural material in a very special application. Anybody know what? [Tom holds up a sample.] This is crystal bar zirconium. You can tell it's fairly heavy. It's made by reducing zirconium tetrachloride on a hot wire of zirconium, and it just grows from the vapor phase. This is a Zircaloy alloy tube — nuclear reactor fuel cladding. Very low nuclear cross-section. Those little neutrons go right through it. So it won't poison the reaction. If you know anything about nuclear reactors, one of the ways you poison the reactor is you put boron in there — you have borated water. Boron absorbs neutrons like gangbusters, and so you can poison the reaction and shut it down. If you have something like Three Mile Island and you want to shut it down, you dump borated water on top of the reaction to poison it and stop it. Zirconium has very low nuclear cross-section, which means it's transparent to neutrons. It has to be very pure, because a little bit of hafnium impurity poisons it — hafnium starts absorbing neutrons at very low concentrations.

§11.p2

Vanadium — I only know of one vanadium alloy used in a very specialized oil field application for corrosion resistance. Niobium and vanadium — their major use, hundreds of thousands of tons, is as alloying elements in steel. Most of these other things on the periodic table, we use them just like zinc — they're alloying elements in steel. I've got one and a half billion tons of steel, and if I only put one percent nickel in all that steel I would use more than all the nickel in the world. We do like nickel in steel — we'd love to have nickel in steel, but it's too expensive to put very much in. Cobalt is even more expensive than nickel, but it makes good high temperature alloys. Nickel is the base of all our super alloys. Manganese — about the only thing we use it for — we have huge blast furnaces that turn out half a million tons of manganese a year, because most steels have about one percent manganese in them. One and a half billion tons of steel means 15 million tons of manganese a year.

§11.p3

[Tom produces a manganese sea nodule.] Back around 1975, some companies like Kennecott Copper were big on this. In the Atlantic Ocean near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, if you go down about 6000 feet, you will find the floor is loaded with billions of tons of that. It's extremely rich in copper, which is why Kennecott Copper was interested in it. If you want to see a cross section, if you go to the Infinite Corridor, you'll see one — it has lots of nickel and copper, but it's mostly manganese. You could throw that straight into a furnace and start refining the metal. The only problem is, it's six thousand feet deep. They were looking at mining it in the 70s, because they're scattered all over the seabed, including off the coast of California. I got that from Professor Clark, who got it at some open house at MIT in the mid-70s.

§11.p4

Nick Grant at the time wanted to start a whole manganese metallurgy just like steel, which manganese economically could compete with, if you had rich ores like that and they weren't so difficult to get — being at the bottom of the ocean. If you had ores as rich as some of our iron ores from manganese, economically it's made by the same process as steel — put carbon in a blast furnace with manganese oxide and you get manganese metal out, manganese carbide, manganese-carbon alloy out, just like making cast iron.

§11.p5

Student: [asks about how the nodules formed]

§11.p6

They were formed by some geological process — these vents in the middle of the North Atlantic Ridge. They're just sitting there on the bottom. You have spewing up of minerals into the water from the vents, and somehow they're nucleating and growing, sort of like hail falling onto the surface of the ocean. But it's kind of deep. If it weren't so deep — if you could drain the ocean — you'd have an excellent source.


§12. Precious metals, the rest of the table, and closing [50:31]

§12.p1

All the 3000 series aluminum alloys are aluminum-manganese alloys. Can stock — one percent manganese. So manganese is used as an alloying element. One of the reasons — manganese is allotropic like iron has alpha and gamma, BCC and FCC. Manganese is almost as bad as plutonium — they've got like five or six different crystal structures. Talk about complex metallurgy. This thing's transforming all kinds of ways, and when you start alloying with it you get rid of one phase and start another phase — it's just a mess. Very few people really publish in the open literature on plutonium, but there's been a lot of good metallurgy done on plutonium. It's just not very public.

§12.p2

Most of the rest of these — cobalt — tend to be alloying elements in other things. These are the light metals over here — cadmium, indium, mercury — they melt at low temperatures. Here your precious metals. One of the only precious metals we use in fairly high volume is for turbine blades. [Tom holds up a turbine blade.] This is actually for growth of a single crystal turbine blade that's six percent rhenium. It's about forty dollars an ounce. For the turbine blades in the engines that you fly in airplanes, that alloy, in order to get high temperature properties, has rhenium. They'd love to use platinum, but it's a lot pricier than rhenium. Rhenium is over here on the periodic table close to tungsten. Silver and gold are mostly used in jewelry and pride metals. Palladium and platinum are used as catalysts — that's functional material. Rhodium is used as a catalyst, iridium is used as a catalyst.

§12.p3

When you start looking at the periodic table — these are not structural, these are gases, these are low melting, these are mostly alloying elements with iron or copper or aluminum. These are useless as structural materials. These can only be used in an oxidized state — like a chloride or an oxide. You can use them, but they have corrosion problems just like the others. When you look at the periodic table, we don't have a lot of choices. When you add economics on top of it, we really only have a handful or two handfuls of choices, which most people don't realize. They're always hearing about the functional properties of these other elements — oh, we used erbium to make a beautiful red color phosphor in one of our display screens. Fine, and you'll sell a couple of pounds of that a year, because you're using it in parts per million quantities. Talking structural materials, we're talking very large volumes — tons, millions of tons of material. And there are just not very many choices.

§12.p4

If you have questions about your presentations, you can come see me. I will be around every day but Friday of next week, and I'll be here tomorrow. Thanks, and don't forget to watch your other module at some point.

Cases referenced

Layer 2 — cleanup edit
p1 00:00

Slide that I was, I was looking for the other day on, this is a, the Alcoa book called From Monopoly to Competition, and it wasn't, it's a book about Alcoa that wasn't written by Alcoa. It's written by some guy in the media and he interviewed lots of people from Alcoa. Most of the books are written about companies are written by the companies, they're paid for by the companies, that are sort of biased okay. This guy actually goes through and he says a lot of things. I showed you the picture of the nice beautiful Pittsburgh Reduction Company and then the real picture, you know. Alcoa wouldn't put that in if they had paid for the book right.

p2 00:43

But anyway, so right after, on the eve of World War II, not after World War II, Alcoa had a monopoly in bauxite, which is the raw material for the Hall cell, and alumina, which is an even purer material, and making real aluminum, pure aluminum. Alcoa owned the business in the United States okay, they were the only ones in the business. Um, fabricated aluminum products, uh they owned 50, on average, foil was only 50 percent. Who was the other big foil producer in aluminum? Reynolds. And why did Reynolds go into the foil business? Reynolds is part of Reynolds Tobacco, or was part of Reynolds Tobacco, the Reynolds family of Richmond, Virginia. And they needed something to wrap their cigarettes in, and they decided we use enough foil we might as well start our own aluminum foil business. And so Reynolds Aluminum is a spin-off of Reynolds Tobacco.

p3 01:45

And so that's why Alcoa didn't have, or only had 50 percent. It turns out the only three aluminum companies of note were Alcoa, Kaiser, and Reynolds was very specialized at that time. They've grown in what they do. But anyway, Alcoa was a pretty well integrated monopoly. Remember there were other integrated monopolies, Henry Ford making automobiles, he had his own steel plant, you know, he had his own glass plant, you know. Alcoa had their own hydroelectric plants. They built big dams. There's a town, anybody from eastern Tennessee? And town right near Knoxville called Alcoa. You fly into the airport for Knoxville, you'll be flying into Alcoa, Tennessee. Alcoa built hydroelectric plants in the Smoky Mountains back in, uh they started out at Niagara Falls, because that's where you get your electricity, back in the 1890s. But by, my, 1910 they were going to other places where they had wild rivers and building dams and building big smelting plants, um, Hall cell plants. In fact Alcoa still has a plant in Alcoa, Tennessee, okay.

p4 03:00

That brings us up time, start class. So that's just another little thing. Any questions from people who just showed up? Nope. Oh okay. The schedule is, Dr. Belmar will do Friday and Tuesday, Monday's a holiday, we'll start presentations on Wednesday and Thursday. Turns out, the reason I wanted to get things started is because things come up, and it looks like next Friday I've got to be in Houston. So the people who are listed here for Friday, and I'll have Jerry send this around, we still have some people to sign up okay. It looks like we are going to run into November 3rd if I have to cancel next Friday presentations. But hopefully we, I won't have to cancel too many of these. That all the other days on here um are good. I didn't put down the 30th and 31st because I have to be in Houston on those days. Um, in any case, that's the schedule. We handed this out so most people should have an idea of what the schedule is. Okay, any questions or any of the other new people that just showed up? Nope. Okay.

p5 04:11

The themes from Tuesday: the brittleness of glass, which makes it unfit as a structural material in general okay, is overcome by surface modification. You can encapsulate, that's called fiberglass. You can use thermal processes, that's called tempered glass. You can use chemical processes, that's called ion exchange, where you substitute the sodium atoms with potassium atoms. Or if you really want to get a lot, you can make a lithiated glass and substitute it with potassium and you get a bigger, even bigger difference.

p6 04:45

So glass is a structural material. So all the things I tell you in most things, I often say whatever the rule is there's usually exceptions to the rule. And so if I tell you the rule is you need fracture toughness to be a structural material, that's absolutely true, and that's an important thing. But it turns out glass has certain properties, it's transparent, and so we like that for certain applications, and there's not a lot of other choices other than plastic, which doesn't have a lot of strength. And I gave you some things comparing glass to plastics, uh, structural materials. Glass also can give you fantastic strength. Those fibers when they're freshly made can give you a half million psi. I mean if you test them within minutes of forming the fiber, you can get 2 million psi on glass fibers. But within hours it's down to only half a million. Well that's still pretty good, it's just as good as Kevlar fiber okay. And so you can make fiberglass, and we make boats out of fiberglass, and we've been doing it for years, because glass has very good strength, has terrible toughness, but we can get around that. You get the toughness by basically making a composite. And you can do thermal treatments to temper the glass so that it doesn't shatter with terrible shards that are going to kill people. And you can do chemical tempering if you really want to spend some money long. This is a process that takes a couple of minutes, this is a process takes hours, like three or four hours. So obviously chemical tempered glass is not used as often, it's pricier, but it gives you a much thicker layer of protection. We were talking the other day about how deep the compressive stresses go okay on this from the surface. And the chemical tempering gives you excellent properties of maybe 40 or 50 microns, and thermal depends on the thickness of the glass and it can also be a few microns as well. But you've got to get, you've basically, I get rid of those scratches on the glass that go um, you know a tenth of a micron deep. Those are harmful okay. So that's glass.

p7 07:02

And now since it's the last day I've got to cover the rest of the periodic table okay, of structural materials. Now we have done, we've done aluminum and, we've done most of the aluminum. The other theme from the other day is aluminum was not, monopoly from 1890 to 1945. I told you that one of the Achilles heels of steel is corrosion okay. Steel rusts and we do all kinds of things to protect against that. We came up with, the Swedes in Sweden around 1907 or so they added chromium to steel at more than 10 percent and they came up with stainless steel. And we use a significant amount of stainless steel, about two to five percent of a typical steel industry is going to be in stainless okay. So in the United States we might use, if we use 100 million tons of steel a year we might use between two and five million tons of stainless. There are five different types of general types of classes: ferritic, martensitic, austenitic, duplex, and precipitation hardening. The big one is austenitic, that's 304 or 18-8 stainless steel. And there's a whole genealogy chart of this. We don't have time to go through all of these. I think in last year's lecture I finished up a little bit earlier and I spent some time on this. Um, and here it says stainless steel is about two percent of all steel.

p8 08:33

But there are problems with stainless steels. And that, my experience is, although steel's, stainless steels are two percent of all steels, which makes them about two percent of all metals, they constitute 30 percent of all the problems and failures. That's because everybody figures oh it's stainless. Well, a lot of people, you read some things and they say it's stainless, it's not stain free okay. I mean you can, people bring me about once or twice a year, someone will bring me a piece of something, they say this was supposed to be stainless steel, it's all rusty so it can't be stainless. Someone gave me the wrong material. Said no, that's stainless. You get rid of that protective chromium oxide skin and it will rust okay, just like regular steel.

p9 09:19

So now aluminum, which I haven't finished up here completely, but it's the second most widely used metal. Two percent of steel, about 20 million tons a year. But it's five times the cost of steel okay. Historically we've gone through, is more precious than gold, and a significant fraction, like it used to be, it may not be quite this anymore, but aluminum was forty percent, of all aluminum went into can stock, beverage containers. That's a sweet spot for the aluminum industry. There's a lot of different alloy series. If you take some of the other things on the on the web, other modules then I end up going through some of these things. There are heat treatable and wrought steels. The wrought steels are basically things like the 3000 series which is can stock, and the 5000 series which is aluminum-magnesium alloys. It's not heat treatable but you can weld it and get essentially full strength. So if you're the US Navy and you're trying to build an aluminum ship that's lightweight, you're going to have to weld it, so you make it out of 5000 series. The aerospace industry likes to use heat treatable because they're going to rivet it, they don't have to weld it. And instead of getting 25 ksi, which, or 30, which you might get in the wrought material, although they've got some wrought materials up in the 40 ksi that are a little bit stronger than the lowest strength steels they want, you can get 75 ksi.

p10 10:54

And in fact, the problem with the heat treatable, they actually can start to degrade at fairly low temperatures. The supersonic transport Concorde was not limited on speed, it was limited on skin temperature of the high, the heat treatable aluminum alloys, they would start to over-age and you'd lose your precipitation hardening. So they actually had sensors on the surface that would measure the temperature, and the colder it was up there okay, at whatever altitude you were the faster you could go okay. But it was limited, you didn't want to destroy your aircraft by overheating the aluminum. So, and that's the same type of thing, they've just started coming out with aluminum and automotive brakes. But the first real problem of aluminum trying to use it for calipers and disc brakes and things like that, not the drum but the caliper that holds the brake pads, the first big problem was they would creep. You hit your brakes hard, you get too much temperature, and all of a sudden the caliper holding the brake pads starts to splay out, and you no longer have any pressure on your brakes, and your brakes, it's called brake fade, and it's not a good thing. Well they fixed some of that.

p11 12:08

Student: [inaudible question about Concorde skin friction]

p12 12:08

Yeah, just yeah, air friction on the skin at 40,000 feet, okay. Now you start getting up to 60 and 70,000 feet where these spy planes go, they actually had to use titanium because they couldn't use aluminum. The friction, don't ask me why, I'm not sure I understand why you get more rarefied you get more friction. Did you know, Sam?

p13 12:31

Student: [suggests supersonic shockwave]

p14 12:33

Oh yeah, you're super, exactly. Yeah you get the shockwave effect, yeah, you're right. I mean they're going, the spy planes were going supersonic, and the Concorde, well this Concorde was going supersonic, but yes it, it's more friction because it's supersonic. Then a Boeing 747 doesn't have to worry about the skin temperature, it's minus 40 up there okay. It's when you go supersonic, but the Concorde was supersonic. Why the spy planes, maybe they were going Mach 4 rather than Mach 3 or Mach 2. Actually I think the Concorde was about Mach 2 or Mach 2 and a half. I only flew it once. I did fly it once. So anyway, so there are some issues.

p15 13:16

But in fact all these things I told you about how wonderful steel is, and I'll continue to tell you how it dominates the market, here is something that you should actually write this down. Here is the Federal Aviation Administration Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization, MMPDS-05. It's about 11 or 12 volume set, about that thick. If you want to buy it it's a hundred and ten dollars because the government can't make a profit. It's the cost of printing. If you want to download it it's free okay. This used to be known as MIL Handbook 5. It was put together by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Defense. But it's sort of been taken over because the Department of Defense is trying to get out of the standards business. This document can, let's see, is it replaces, anyway MIL Handbook 5, okay, um, which was maintained by the US Air Force okay. So that was up until 2004. The Defense Department is trying to get out of being the standard writing body for the country. So they turned this over to the Federal Aviation Administration. It was originally written in conjunction with them. Actually it's a compilation. If you're the Defense Department, you got that kind of purchasing power, you can tell Boeing you want some data to go into this handbook, and Boeing wants to give it to you because the FAA is going to define the material properties that you can use to build your aircraft in terms of this handbook.

p16 14:57

In fact that's what it says: "This document contains design information on the strength properties of metallic materials elements for aircraft and aerospace vehicle structures." They have two different types of, or, tolerances. And the aerospace, or the spacecraft tolerance is much narrower band of strength requirements. Regular grade, I think it's grade B, is a broader band, and that's for most regular aircraft. But uh, this is going to read you something from here, oh, scope of the handbook is primarily intended to provide a source of design mechanical and physical properties and joint allowable, so it takes care of welds. Material property and joint data obtained from tests by material and fastener producers. So they go out, and anybody that the Defense Department would buy from they'd say, give us your data we want to put it in the handbook, and you want to give it to us because what data we put in there we're going to help evaluate, and this is what we're going to say is your design allowable when you design an aircraft that you want FAA approval for, if it's commercial aircraft, or you want the military to approve, you must use the data in this book.

p17 16:10

Student: Why would they let them, isn't that sort of like self-regulating because if they're providing the data?

p18 16:18

Oh. But all the aluminum producers gonna do it okay, and then the Defense Department and the FAA will evaluate everybody's data, and if there's a big discrepancy they'll say okay let's have a little meeting and work this out. And the lowest quality might end up being the one that goes into the book okay. Because, no, the government can't say well, Alcoa, you've got a better grade of 7075 aluminum and therefore we're going to require everyone to buy your better grade. The government actually has to go to the lowest common denominator on properties okay. So no, they got some regulations they have to worry about. This is just the introduction which doesn't have, well it's just an introduction.

p19 17:02

But if you go to, well, if you go to one of the books, this is chapter two, this is the whole book on steels. And why do steels come first? Hey, I told you why steels know fall. And this is just a wonderful book. Graph after graph, it's nothing but graphs of data. This is why you want to have a copy, because it's free. And it's materials okay. And hey, it's not a bad source to look up data. But remember I told you steel was more important economically, than as an industry, than aluminum. Two volumes on aluminum, one volume on steel. And the two aluminum volumes are thicker. Why? You make aircraft out of aluminum, not out of steel. Why? Cause steel's heavy, another one of its problems. So guess what, if you're writing a design manual for aircraft, aluminum's gonna be the big gun okay, not steel. So steel doesn't always win. Okay, it loses in corrosion and some other things. Here's magnesium, cute little thing in it okay. Heat resistant alloys, nickel based super alloys, all your engine materials, not too thick. I believe there's a lot more data out on this stuff that is proprietary. And titanium alloys, it's less than steel okay, but there's a fair amount on titanium compared to its market volume because titanium tends to be used in aircraft okay. So it's worth thinking about whether you want to fill up your computer space with that okay. Well, if you're going to be in materials you ought to at least know about it okay.

p20 18:47

Other materials, if you went back and looked at, I gave you a plot, this is the last lecture, this is what we did in the first lecture, where he said structural materials production. And this may not be the exact graph that I gave you, but steel's one and a half billion tons, aluminum is 45 million tons, copper is 15 million, zinc is 12 million. And you can go down to these other non-metals, and at least cement and stone are larger than steel. Plastics, as a whole, all plastics are more than aluminum, but they're nowhere close to about a weight of steel, so far as that goes. Um, and we're going to talk a little bit about why these are where they are okay.

p21 19:36

Copper has some unique properties. One is got color, yeah, but that's not why we use it, uh, most times, sometimes for architectural reasons. What's the number one property of copper that we really like?

p22 19:53

Student: Conductivity.

p23 19:53

Conductivity, which type of conductivity? Both, that's right, very good. So if I want to look at, if I go, if I take the train from Amtrak from Boston to New York, I'm going to be, the electrical conductors, that's electrical train, is going to have trolley wire. You go look up and they got all these ugly towers the whole distance. And this is about a 0.545 inch diameter, and it's got a cross section so you can clamp it like this, and the graphite brushes that are on the top of the uh the train will slide along this thing at 100 miles an hour right. So that's trolley wire.

p24 20:40

They wanted to make it out of an aluminum ingot that looked like this. I have this stuff because one year on December 22nd I got a phone call saying you have to tell us by Christmas, three days later, whether we can accept six million dollars of this material to go for the New Haven to Boston extension. And, huh, this is how thick it is. Well that is a wire. Yeah, that's all that carries, and it's because it has good electrical conductivity and good corrosion resistance, um, on the surface, better than aluminum okay. But you want electrical conductivity and you're willing to pay a premium. So I had all of about 48 hours to figure out whether to accept or reject this. I rejected it, and they had to go buy some material from a different supplier. It's probably, the story is probably in one of my other lectures, but, in any case, the grain size was too large okay, because it was too pure. Turns out and they needed to get some strength, so that wa— that copper alloy has two-tenths of a percent silver in it to strengthen it. That makes it even a little pricier okay. But pure copper is very weak okay.

p25 21:56

It also has very good thermal conductivity. So I've got a piece here, this is a piece for thermal conductivity. [Tom holds up a tensile specimen.] And this is actually a tensile specimen between molybdenum and copper, and they did a transient liquid phase diffusion bond. I'm sure I talked about this in one of my other ones, certainly my joining. Molybdenum will take very high temperatures, it's, and so if you have a radar system and you want to have amplified radar, if you're trying to do, fly, if you're the military and try to fly nap-of-the-earth at sonic velocities okay but a couple of hundred uh meters above the surface of the earth, so if you make a mistake you got less, you don't have time to make a correction, you have to rely on your radar to keep you from running into a hill okay. They have some very powerful x-ray machines, and they do that with an electron beam that generates the x-rays. Or the, yeah well, the radar amplifier. And you would melt copper with the heat intensity of that pulsed electron beam, but you won't melt molybdenum. But you need the thermal conductivity of copper, so they make a composite. They braze a little, about two millimeters of molybdenum on the end of a copper piece. The molybdenum takes the heat and the copper carries it away. Yep.

p26 23:19

Student: What's this striation in the middle?

p27 23:21

Oh that's what we call orange peel. Those are the grains. And the copper, when we did the tensile test, you're starting to see it deform in the crystal structures, because you have slip on different crystallographic planes. You actually, that was a smooth bar when it was machined, but when you start deforming it each one of the grains deforms at a different rate, and you end up with what they call orange peel because it has the kind of texture of an orange peel.

p28 23:49

Student: [asks if it's unique to copper]

p29 23:49

No, it's not unique to copper. We see it more in copper alloys, but it shows up, I've seen aluminum with orange peel okay. You got to start with the right, you got to start with the incorrect grain structure to begin with, and copper tends to give you that okay. You can get orange peel in steels okay, but we know how to produce fine grained steels that won't give you that okay. Very pure coppers will give you large grain size, just like the casting that is going around okay. The purer the metal, the easier for the grains to grow okay. Impurities are one of the best ways to suppress grain growth up to a certain extent okay.

p30 24:30

So copper has unique electrical and thermal conductivity, and even though it's much more expensive than aluminum and steel we use it okay. Now we don't use it, aluminum has 60 percent of the conductivity of copper, and so all those big 345 kilovolt transmission towers and stuff, that's aluminum, because you don't want to pay that much for the copper okay. However, the aluminum tends to get soft right. So you actually make a composite. Those are actually steel cores with aluminum on the outside, and the steel gives you the strength. And one of the reasons for that is, why are they so tall? Well one of the reasons they're so tall is when you have, everybody's running their air conditioners during the summer, they heat up, and they actually have to make them tall enough so that as it heat up, heats up and expands, it doesn't touch the ground. Because if it touches the ground, touches the ground, it will start a forest fire or a brush fire. Plus it's not very good for the circuit breakers back at the power station. If you'll lose your power and, remember, I don't know if you would remember, uh you might remember, it was seven or eight years ago they had some tremendous wildfires in San Diego, and it would just burn down all that part of southern California.

p31 25:56

Well it turns out they finally, some people finally got a big one, a big three or four hundred million dollar lawsuit, or got a settlement out of the utility because they claimed that their wires, when, during the summer everybody's using the air conditioner, they came and they touched the ground and started the fire that burned down most of southern California. Whether that's true or not is another question. But the threat of the lawsuit caused the utilities, but, and why would the utility, guess pay hundreds of millions of dollars? We sort of discussed this before. Did I talk about putting things on to the rate base? They, if they have an expense and they can ex— justify it to the regulators in the state of California or Massachusetts if it's Massachusetts, they just pass the cost on to the consumer. So not, why not pay off the attorneys? Why you need that hassle and all the bad press and going to court and everything else? Let's give them hundreds of millions of dollars and then put it on the rate base, let everyone else pay extra 10 bucks a month on their electric bill okay. So all these people in California look at the battle they won, they now have higher monthly electric bills for the next 10 years okay. These are one of the externalities okay, that we talked about before.

p32 27:14

So titanium and tantalum have outstanding corrosion resistance. We know that. In fact that's one of the reasons why titanium's here at 165,000 tons. Uh, half of that, or maybe more, is because of its corrosion resistance, not because it's lightweight high temperature structural material, which it is. About half of that goes into the aerospace industry, and the other half goes into the corrosion resistance industry okay. Making tubing for heat exchangers and all kinds of things. So, and yeah, it's in the medical business. I think this, I have a little stent here. [Tom locates a stent.] It is, pass it around. [Tom hands the stent to the class.] It's a little welded titanium wire okay. Here. It's a little welded titanium wire. So they put this, they'll fold this thing up, slip it in a tube, bring it in right next to your heart, open it up, let the spring open, and it will catch all those clots that are going to kill you okay. Just a filter okay. But it won't corrode in the human body. You try to make that out of stainless steel, it'll be toast in the air okay.

p33 28:28

Student: [inaudible question, possibly about size]

p34 28:32

Hmm, yeah, how, look, check out your aorta and figure out how big it is okay. And it's got those little hooks on the end, that's what digs into the uh the wall of the artery. Now this is an old one from like 10 or 15 years ago. Nowadays I'm sure they're more sophisticated, but they had some problem on the welding of the tip there, so it came to me. I don't even remember what the problem was, but um, in any case, so titanium is great for the human body. Tantalum is even better. Um, but in most of these things we get down to cost is one of the big drivers.

p35 29:15

Anybody have any, I mean this is a very general kind of wrap up lecture. If I go to, I've shown you this type of thing before, the periodic table, and I say well what elements do I use for structural materials? I use almost all the elements on the periodic table for something. Even technetium, which doesn't exist on earth, not as a structural material, but I do use it in radiology for people who are getting stress tests in a hospital, even though it's only got a half-life of 10 hours. They make it, they fly it in Learjets around the country, and when I had a stress test at Mount Auburn Hospital, they shot me full of technetium, and then I was radiating fast enough they could take pictures of my heart pumping while I was running on a treadmill. How exciting okay. And they learned I'm out of shape okay, fine okay.

p36 30:07

So even technetium which doesn't exist on earth we, uh, we use. We don't use francium because francium is never really, it's also radioactive and doesn't really have much of it. Don't have a use for it. If we could find a use we probably would make it, like we do with technetium. And of course all the transuranics are used for, like plutonium which is made in tonnage quantities. Most of these are not used except for plutonium. Americium is used. Americanium, right, americium is the way you pronounce it. Anybody know what it's used for?

p37 30:42

Student: Smoke detectors.

p38 30:42

Smoke detectors, exactly. It's a little radioactive source that helps ionize the particles, that will set up enough conductivity in the air to tell you got smoke in your atmosphere, and it will set off the alarm and wake you up in the middle of the night, or while you're fixing dinner and creating your own smoked particles okay.

p39 31:03

Student: [inaudible — likely about the type of radiation]

p40 31:03

It just, I mean now you're gonna have to ask the nuclear engineer. It gives off the right energy. Uh, probably a beta, electron particles. Well it could be alpha, I don't know. I don't know if it's a beta emitter or an alpha emitter. Is a helium nucleus, beta emitter is an electron. And in the radioactive decay it has the right properties to ionize the air okay. And so they have a very little piece of radioactive material in there, but it happens to be americium for its nuclear properties. But I, I'm not a nuclear engineer so I can't answer you. But we don't have any nukes in here right now, right, anyway.

p41 31:42

Okay um, well we don't, these things, cerium is not, is used in ceramics. Um, cerium oxide has some interesting properties. All the rest of these are used in functional materials okay, except for neodymium is used in neodymium-iron-boron magnets. Promethium, it doesn't, is also like technetium, doesn't really exist in any large quantities, but uh, what's, they gonna say about, I don't remember was I was gonna go to the board anyway. Um, oh, there's structural materials and there's functional materials, that's what I was gonna write down okay. Now, and I covered this one of the early days, maybe not the first day. [Tom writes on the board.]

p42 32:36

Okay, structural materials versus functional. I guess what the message I want to give you right now, the theme for the rest of this morning is, there are very limited numbers of structural materials we really use. We use almost everything else for some functionality, like americium. That's not a structural use, it's because it has certain nuclear decay properties that are good for ionizing particles in air okay. Most of these others we don't really use in large quantities for structural materials. So I mean carbon and silicon are the basis of lots of polymers, silicones and hydrocarbons. Aluminum and silicon and magnesium and calcium are used in stone and cement. The metal aluminum, copper, iron, if you went back to my list, those are the top three okay, in use volume. Aluminum, copper okay, there you, and then you get down to zinc.

p43 33:38

What are the major uses of zinc? Galvanizing. So zinc is mostly used to protect steel okay. I'll bet 80 percent of that 12 million tons of steel of zinc goes into protecting steel from its problem of corrosion. There are zinc alloys, little, we call them pot metal castings. It used to be the handles on cars back 30, 40 years ago were a zinc die casting. And we have, you go to the hardware store, you can find these little cheap metal parts where you want a metal part rather than a plastic part. And it's a metal part, stiffer and whatnot, but they're zinc die castings. They don't have a lot of strength, but they're cheap to make. You can make them by die casting, and they're just as cheap as making, popping out plastic parts, but they're stiffer and stronger. And so when you need a little bit more than you can get with plastics or you need a little more temperature, not much more temperature, you can use zinc. But most of the zinc is going to be used to protect steel. So, I could do this for a lot of things, but zinc basically comes over here, and it's made, major reason we produce zinc is to protect, because of the steel industry. It's also used in some aluminum alloys. It's used in some of the gold alloys and things. But anyway.

p44 35:01

If I start looking at the periodic table, I can wipe out as structural materials the whole first column. I mean lithium is obviously very important for batteries. Uh, sodium is used in glasses as an alloying element with alumina and silica okay, and magnesia and calcium. But these things, well what's one of the problems here in the presence of moisture? What happens to these things if they're metallic? You get a hydroxide, and what is left over from the water molecule? Called hydrogen. Have you ever seen anybody drop sodium on water in high school chemistry, and you get a little fire dancing around the water on the surface of the water? Okay, so they don't have very good corrosion resistance as metals. They might be used as oxides and chlorides, and they have some fantastic functional material properties as optical materials, as sodium chloride or potassium fluoride or whatever. But as structural materials, they just don't cut it at all, because of the corrosion, lack of corrosion resistance in the atmosphere. Even humidity will do it.

p45 36:17

Beryllium is sort of interesting because it's very light, actually has the same density as magnesium. It's actually very slightly more dense than magnesium. But it has very good high temperature capabilities. But it's extremely expensive because its toxicity. Any type of really, if you're 10 percent of the population and you have a genetic predisposition to have your lungs react with beryllium, it's only 10 percent of the population, but any beryllium compound that gets in your lung, whether it's metallic beryllium or beryllium oxide, beryllium chloride, anything, so far as I know, this beryllium compound will grow these nodules in your lungs and you will slowly suffocate. And this was all discovered up here on the corner of Mass Ave and Vassar okay, during the Manhattan Project in World War II. They had a machine shop there. Right now it's a Bank of America kiosk and stuff, at least I'm pretty sure this is where it was. They had a building there, and guys were machining beryllium alloys which were sort of new because, remember, the Mechanical Engineering Department came up with this way to vacuum melt metals, and they were able to make beryllium alloys which were very light, and they had some uses for them in the nuclear weapons. And so they were machining things experimentally here at MIT, and some of these guys in 1944 and 45 started coming down with these health problems. And they ended up contaminating the whole building. I've heard the story, I've never confirmed it, they actually eventually just sat there for about 10 or 12 years. My thesis advisor told me some of this because he was an undergraduate here in the mid-50s when it was sort of sitting there, and they eventually encased it in concrete and carried it and dropped it to Boston Harbor.

p46 38:03

Yeah, yes you had a question. Oh, what do you mean by nodules? You just start growing little cysts, you know, around the, your body is trying to encapsulate the beryllium okay. It doesn't like beryllium, and so your body will start reacting and creating little lumps inside your lungs. So, anyway, it is toxic okay. So, uh, but we do use it. Yeah, but it's only about, they didn't know that originally, but now that we can do genetics and uh DNA tests, some people have a predis—, it's only about ten percent of the population. If you go to um Cabot, Brillco [Brush Wellman], and look on their website, and they have something talks about beryllium, it will tell you that only about 10 percent of people will get it okay. Unless you want to, if you have a test you probably find out whether you're susceptible. But nonetheless, everybody's afraid of beryllium.

p47 38:56

When I was department head had a young assistant professor, who actually what became Chris Hughes [Schuh's] thesis advisor at Northwestern, and he found, we were cleaning out Nick Grant's old lab, or he was cleaning out, on third floor of building eight. And he had, he found a little plastic bottle that said Be on it. And he came rushing into my office, we found, I found powdered beryllium. And so I said well okay, and so he went over there and I picked it up. Oh, you touched it, you touched the bo—. I said I'm just like, David, I'm not drinking it okay, I'm not breathing it, it's just in the bottle, I'm picking up the bot—. He was, he just, he saw Be on the bottle and he thought that he'd just come across a nuclear weapon okay. Anyway, so we had to call Environmental Health Services and they got to dispose of it. I'm sure Nick Grant probably had that since 1945 or whatever and had been sitting in the cabinet, and when he finally retired we were clearing out the cabinet, there's a lot of other things in there too. But anyway, uh, I had to calm down the assistant professor.

p48 40:02

Uh, I already told you about beryllium tools. And I can take copper and beryllium and I can make something as hard as hardened steel, 180 ksi okay. So I can make tools that don't spark, because it has a very good thermal conductivity of copper, and beryllium is the only thing that on the periodic table that can do that to copper okay. If we had anything else, you think we'd be using beryllium at the price of beryllium? But beryllium is unique in those properties. So beryllium sort of interesting.

p49 40:31

Scandium, yttrium, and lanthanum. Well, they're all interesting for ceramics, for functional materials. The only use I know of any of them, as well, in some of the ceramics like yttrium stabilized zirconia ceramic, it can be a structural material. Scandium does go into metals, if you look at my little chart, I had scandium on here, two thousand tons a year okay. Let's see, scandium down here. Anybody know what scandium is used for in alloying? Aluminum, right. Anybody know what the highest strength aluminum alloys are, and they're not used for aerospace? 100 ksi strength.

p50 41:23

Because, if you want to hit home runs, you need to match the stiffness of the bat to the stiffness of the baseball or the softball. And to do that, since the aluminum's got this high modulus and the cork and you know, twine and everything else and horsehide has a low modulus, the way to do that, this is solid, this has to be very thin wall, so you get the springiness of a trampoline effect. In fact they call it the trampoline effect. And I, you know, actually one of you was talking about you doing, uh was it lacrosse rackets, or anyway, you're doing some sports thing. Uh, well, you said pole vaulting. No, but someone else, maybe she's not here, she had some sport, and she wanted to do, uh she was interested in, I think it was lacrosse or something, anyway composite materials for whatever. Oh, and she was, they also they're now going to composite baseball bats, she tells me.

p51 42:20

A couple years ago when I was looking at this, uh, they were still mostly aluminum. You can dial in the properties, but the way they get 100 ksi they add scandium. Scandi-malloy says right there okay. What does that mean to most of the little leaguers? Not much. Scandium alloy, they don't even know what an alloy is, much less scandium. But scandium can give you extremely fine grain size that's extruded as a tube, and as you extrude it you're quenching it at the same time, so you do your heat treatment process as part of your extrusion. So it's just like squirting out toothpaste. But you can get tremendous, tremendously fine grain size and tremendously rapid heating and cooling, and therefore you can get 100 ksi strengths. Alcoa has built, has made a number of proprietary alloys. Well, they're not really proprietary, a number of specialty alloys, that they sell to the baseball manufacturers. It's a huge industry, I had no idea how big that industry was. But they they're up to about 105 ksi now, but they're getting so thin in the wall that some of these things you can take about one good hit before you start getting cracks in your bat. Who wants to pay 150 dollars for a bat and use it once right?

p52 43:38

Student: Question, copper cables for the trolleys and transmissions you mentioned, that they also do silver impurity sometimes just to suppress spring. Is that like, yeah, and to add strength right? Okay yeah, is this the same situation, what's the mechanism?

p53 43:54

This actually helps with the precipitation hardening and the grain size. You can use titanium, but it's not as good. The Soviets really developed the scandium addition okay. And, if you really want to get the best, and only the baseball bat, you know, actually sports materials actually often leads in a lot of other things, because as I always say, you can sell anything to a golfer okay. You know, high end of their earning capacity, you know, old men okay, who want to be able to brag against their, you know, the other CEOs on the golf course, that they, you know, anyway. So they'll pay anything, they'll pay ten thousand dollars for something that, it's hardly worth it anyway, uh, it's all pride. Yes, they were making metallic woods, or you know, golf ball, golf heads, and they would get about six shots before they would all crack and everything okay.

p54 44:57

So what is the mechanism? It goes to the grain boundaries and it gives grain boundary drag. I mean if you don't have impurities the grain will just, grains will grow by a diffusional mechanism. If you have impurities there, you get what's called grain boundary drag. Yeah, you want something that actually is surface active on the grain boundaries and it gets caught okay. It's sort of like precipitation, precipitants will do the same thing, but even individual atoms will do it too. It's called grain boundary drag.

p55 45:29

Now, titanium, zirconium, and hafnium. Well, titanium we already know about. Zirconium is a structural material in a very special application. Anybody know what? [Tom holds up a sample.] This is crystal bar zirconium. You can tell it's fairly heavy. It's made by reducing zirconium tetrachloride on a hot wire of zirconium, and it just grows from the vapor phase. This is a Ziconie [Zircaloy] alloy, Zircaloy alloy tube, nuclear reactor fuel cladding. Very low nuclear cross section. Those little neutrons go right through it okay. And so it won't poison the reaction okay. If you know anything about nuclear reactors, one of the way you poison the reactor is you put boron in there. You have borated water. Boron absorbs neutrons like gangbusters, and so you can poison the reaction and shut it down. So if you have something like Three Mile [Island] and you want to dump it, dump borated water on top of the reaction to poison it and stop it. Hafnium on the other, zirconium uh has very low nuclear cross-section which means it's transparent to neutrons. It has to be very pure, cause a little bit of hafnium impurity and hafnium poisons it, and it starts absorbing neutrons at a very low concentration.

p56 46:50

Vanadium, I only know of one vanadium alloy used in a very specialized oil field application for corrosion resistance. Niobium and vanadium, their major use, where they make a million times, well I don't know a million tons, but hundreds of thousands of tons, I haven't got them on here, it's because they're alloying elements in steel. In fact what I'm going to tell you is most of these other things on the periodic table, we use them just like zinc, because they're alloying elements in steel. I got one and a half billion tons of steel, and if I only put one percent nickel in all that steel I would use more than all the nickel in the world okay. And we do like nickel in steel, we'd love to have nickel in steel, it's too expensive to put very much of it in. Cobalt, and cobalt is even more expensive than nickel but it makes good high temperature alloys. Nickel is the base of all our super alloys in general. Manganese, about the only thing we use it for, we have huge blast furnaces turn out half a million tons of manganese a year because most steels have about one percent manganese in them. That's, you know, one and a half billion tons, that means 15 million tons of manganese a year.

p57 48:07

Here's a manganese sea nodule okay. Um, so, back, let's see what I was going to explain that. Back around 1975 some of the companies like Kennecott Copper I think was big on this. And in the Atlantic Ocean near the middle ridge, if you go down about 6000 feet, you will find the floor is loaded with billions of tons of that. And it's extremely rich in copper, which is why Kennecott Copper was interested in it. If you want to see a cross section, if you go to the Infinite Corridor, you'll see a little nickel and copper, has lots of nickel and copper, but it's mostly manganese. And you could throw that straight into a furnace and start refining the metal okay. The only problem is, it's six thousand feet deep okay, which, but they were looking at mining it in the 70s, because they're just scattered all over the seabed, and they got some in California, you know, off the coast of California. And so, I got that from Professor Clark who got it at some open house at MIT in the mid-70s.

p58 49:17

But Nick Grant at the time, who is now alloy developer here, he wanted to start a whole manganese metallurgy just like steel iron, which manganese economically could compete, if you had rich ores like that and didn't, they weren't so difficult to get, being at the bottom of the ocean. But if you had ores as rich as some of our iron ores from manganese, economically it's made by the same process of making steel, put carbon in a blast furnace with manganese oxide and you get manganese metal out, manganese carbide, manganese and carbon alloy out, just like you do with making cast iron. Yes.

p59 49:54

Student: [asks about how the nodules formed]

p60 49:54

They were formed by some geological process, you know, these vents in the middle of the Atlantic North Atlantic Ridge and stuff. Nope, they're just sitting there on the bottom. I mean I don't know exactly, but I assume that they, you have spewing up, you know, minerals into the water from the vents, and somehow they're nucleating and growing, and you know, sort of like hail coming down, onto falling on the surface of the ocean. But it's kind of deep. And if it weren't so deep, if you could drain the ocean, you'd have an excellent source of water.

p61 50:31

Yeah, manganese, they're all the 3000 series aluminum alloys are aluminum-manganese alloys. Canned stock, one percent manganese. So manganese is, but it's used as an alloying element. One of the reasons is, you gotta start looking at, manganese is allotropic like iron has alpha and B, alpha and gamma, BCC and FCC. Manganese is almost as bad as plutonium, they got like five or six different crystal structures. And so, talk about complex metallurgy okay. This thing's transforming all kinds of ways, and when you start alloying with it you get rid of one phase and start another phase, it's just a mess okay. Very few people really publish in the open literature on plutonium, but I mean there's been a lot of good metallurgy done on plutonium. It's just not very public okay.

p62 51:26

Uh anyway most of the rest of these, cobalt, they tend to be alloying elements in other things. These are the light metals over here okay, cadmium, indium okay, they melt, mercury, melt at low temperatures. Here your precious metals. One of the only precious metals we use in fairly high volume is turbine blades. This is actually for growth of a single crystal turbine blade that's six percent rhenium. I don't remember reading, it's about forty dollars an ounce or something. And for the turbine blades and the, you know, the engines that you fly in the airplanes, that alloy in order to get high temperature properties has got some rhenium. They'd love to use platinum but it's kind of pricey, a lot pricier than rhenium. Is getting over here on the periodic table close to the tungsten, aluminum. Silver and gold are mostly used in jewelry and, you know, pride metals okay. Palladium and platinum are used as catalysts, that's functional material. Rhodium is used as a catalyst, iridium is used as a catalyst.

p63 52:29

You start looking at the periodic table, these are not structural, these are gases, these are low melting, these are mostly alloying elements with iron or copper or aluminum. These are useless as structural materials. These can only be used in an oxidized state, like a chloride or an oxide usually. You can use them, but they got corrosion properties just like these others do. Anyway, you start looking at the periodic table, we don't have a lot of choices. And when you add economics on top of it, we really only have a handful or two handfuls of choices okay, which most people don't realize. And they always, they're always hearing about the functional properties of these other, oh we used erbium to make a beautiful red color phosphor in one of our display screens or something okay. Fine, and you'll sell a couple of pounds of that a year okay, because you're using it in parts per million quantities right. Talking structural materials, we're talking very large volumes, tons, millions of tons of material. And they're just not very many choices okay.

p64 53:35

If you have questions about your presentations and stuff you can come see me. I will be around every day but Friday of next week and I'll be here tomorrow and stuff okay. Thanks, and don't forget to watch your other module at some point.