§1. Hot corrosion of turbine blade coatings [00:02]
This is hydrogen chloride gas, not hydrogen chloride acid and not hydrochloric acid. You can see as a function of temperature what different types of compounds do — they still like to think of pH on the partial pressure of oxygen. So you can look and see what would happen to something like those turbine blades I passed around, which have things in here for sulfur.
Here are some four-way diagrams for iron and sulfur. These things can get really messy. After all, if you've been doing the same calculations for forty years, you start to try to make things more complex — that's what professors do. But to give you an idea about those turbine blades I passed around — would you like to be flying on that airplane?
If you look at the sulfidation, the hot corrosion — Pourbaix diagrams explain the thermodynamics of corrosion, but the real problem in corrosion is trying to understand the kinetics, how fast it occurs. This is for the high-temperature corrosion of an overlay coating versus temperature for a nickel chrome aluminum yttrium — we call it the NiCrAlY alloy. A lot of your turbine blades in jet engines will have this corrosion-resistant coating on the surface, because it's better than just straight nickel. It's nickel chrome aluminum and yttrium.
It turns out below 800 degrees centigrade you don't have a problem because the kinetics are too slow. Above 1000 degrees you don't condense out your sulfur compounds. But in between you have hot corrosion. Notice this goes from zero to 100 and then up to 200, so really this heat is about twice as tall. You have about a factor of 200 increase in the corrosion rate, over a very narrow range where kinetics are too slow for diffusion at low temperatures, and at high temperatures all your gaseous products are vaporizing away and not condensing. There's this one condensing region in between.
§2. The Mexican airline case [02:29]
This is the type of corrosion that occurred on those turbine blades. What you need to understand is when you start that engine, it starts out cold and it has to go through this region, but you don't want it to stay in this region very long. About 900 degrees centigrade is about 1650 Fahrenheit, and that's sort of what you might get with some of the takeoff power in this particular part of the engine.
What we think was happening — this was six or seven or eight years ago, as I remember — is that the Mexicans weren't going down to the end of the runway and running their engines and preheating the engine for ten or fifteen minutes. They figured, let's not waste all that gas on the runway getting things up to temperature, let's just turn on the engine and take off. And what happens is when you take off, you stay in this region for five or ten minutes. You're now doing your preheating up in the air, at full power, coasting at a lower power. And we think that's why they sulfidated so quickly.
Just to show you what can come out of an operating engine — pretty amazing. And it would have been much longer for some of those, started flying through the engine, taking out the engine, which is another thing.
§3. Engine reliability statistics and the two-engine rule [04:01]
How often does an engine fail? Once. I was actually thinking of a statistical number. If you go look up General Electric aircraft engines, they will tell you that it has like a 99.6 percent probability per hour of not failing. Well, that means you're going to get a failure about every 250 to 300 hours. How many people have flown 250 hours? Yeah, okay — I've probably flown several thousand hours. They don't usually tell you when they have to shut down one of the engines, but they do, in flight.
You hope it doesn't occur on takeoff. That's the worst time to lose an engine. It doesn't really matter too much on landing. You need power for takeoff, you don't need power for cruising. In fact, the 747s have four engines. How many engines on a 777? Why? It was a big deal when they came out with the 777 fifteen or twenty years ago to get the FAA to certify it for flight over the Atlantic. It used to be that if you were going to be more than two hours from land, you had to have four engines on a commercial big jet. Back in the old days the probability wasn't 99.6, it was like 98.7. And you start doing the math on this, and there's a certain probability you could lose more than one engine if you're more than two hours from land. But the reliability has been going up.
Even so, those of you that fly a lot — you've been on a number of planes where statistically they shut down an engine but they didn't bother to tell you. Just so you know. But you can land on one engine if you know how to fly.
§4. Tom Eagar's nine principles and the Venn diagram of corrosion [06:12]
What we're going to go over, probably on Wednesday — I'm going to start going through Tom Eagar's nine principles of approach. We're not going to spend a lot of time on it right now; we've only got a couple of minutes. But recognizing that you are going to be engineers, engineering managers in the future, I'm not trying to teach a corrosion course where you learn everything there is to know about protecting a steel.
You need to know what type of questions to ask the people working for you. There's no way in a short little course that we can tell you everything we don't know about corrosion, because corrosion is worse than welding in terms of — you tell someone a certain rule, and then you have to violate the rule later because the circumstances change. In corrosion, circumstances change all the time.
You can draw a diagram for corrosion with three circles, a Venn diagram. This originally was for stress corrosion cracking, or hydrogen embrittlement or something like that. You have to have a stress for stress corrosion cracking, and you have to have a material that's susceptible.
In a Venn diagram, if you remember from math, you can increase or decrease the size of these circles. The big problem occurs right in here where all three of these come together to create the environment for the environmental degradation of the material — meaning it rotted and it fell apart.
§5. The Fenway Franks hot dog cooker [08:23]
Tomorrow I will pass this around. It's too delicate to go around right now, but this came out of a hot dog cooker over in Everett. This is flaking off as we do it here. This is where they make Fenway Franks. The hot dog cooker is a lot bigger than this room. It's a big steam tunnel made out of stainless steel, taller than you or me, not quite the size of a single-car garage. It's a tunnel where they take all these hot dogs and cook them in steam.
It's supposed to be made out of 316 stainless steel. And it was made out of 316 stainless steel, but over time they had to replace the parts, or they put some new baffles in. All of a sudden within a few weeks, stuff is cracking and falling apart. Looking sideways, it's bent from all the cracking.
They brought me in and said, why is our cooker falling apart? And I said, I don't know. So I took it back to the lab — they let me have these pieces — and we turned on the scanning electron microscope, and we found the 316 stainless steel is not 316 stainless steel, it's 304 stainless steel. What's the difference between the two of them? About two percent molybdenum. What's the environment? It's a hot chloride steam. It's a lot of salted hot dogs. Hot oxidizing chloride — this probably would have dissolved gold over time. You could have made this thing out of gold and it probably would rot in your hot dog cooker.
It turns out somebody was supposed to make the parts out of 316 — 304 is what we're going to learn is the garden-variety stainless steel — but they were supposed to make it out of 316 and they made it out of 304. This is the most dramatic case I've ever seen of where you should use 316 and used 304. So the wrong material can make a big difference, just like I told you about that destroyer in the Gulf War — they lost their 3000 psi steam line because of stress corrosion cracking, because it was the wrong alloy. So these are two stories where they used the wrong material.
In other cases I'll tell you stories about where the stress was wrong. In other cases where they had an environment that was a lot worse than they expected. Any one of those three things — and these are some of the things we'll talk about, some of those principles, and what happens in general. A lot of it's going to be sort of empirical stories, but the stories are sort of fun. Now you know how to cook hot dogs, right? You should have a 316 stainless steel pan boiling water. We'll see you tomorrow.