Classified aircraft hydrogen embrittlement case
Appears in 1 lecture.
Appearances across the corpus
Companion case to the elevator wire — Tom can't name it but notes it involved a very high strength steel similar to aircraft landing gear material. Same diagnostic confusion (no intergranular fracture despite hydrogen embrittlement).
So this guy was looking at failures of an elevator cable, and he wanted to know — he had looked at the failures and they were somewhat brittle failures on some of the wires. One of the things you always suspect when you have brittle failures in steel is hydrogen embrittlement. He says, but we didn't see intergranular fracture. I said, of course not — the thing's been deformed so much, those grains are all wavy-shaped grains. You're not going to see intergranular fracture on a piano wire. This is only the second time in a month I've had to explain this. I can't tell you about the other one because it had to do with an aircraft — people were looking and they thought it was hydrogen embrittlement but they couldn't find intergranular fracture, which is characteristic of hydrogen embrittlement. It's not characteristic in piano wire because you don't have grains that are well enough shaped to give you intergranular fracture. This other thing, basically a very high strength steel similar to what they use in aircraft landing gear — it wasn't an aircraft landing gear, it was an aircraft application, I can't tell you more right now — probably was hydrogen embrittlement, but you can change the chemistry of the steel and you don't always get intergranular fracture with hydrogen. Ninety-eight percent of the time you do, so these people are thinking, well, I don't see intergranular, it can't be hydrogen. You need to know about the other 2% sometimes.